User talk:108.175.233.87: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) response |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi. If you want to recruit good candidates to run for ArbCom, the most productive thing might be to suggest running to them directly, on their talkpages. (FYI, I agree with many of your suggestions, although I know that at least some are unlikely to be interested, especially among those who have served before.) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 15:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. If you want to recruit good candidates to run for ArbCom, the most productive thing might be to suggest running to them directly, on their talkpages. (FYI, I agree with many of your suggestions, although I know that at least some are unlikely to be interested, especially among those who have served before.) [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 15:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
||
:At a guess, none or almost none of them would be interested. It's more a lovely dream of how to-the-point and sane the ArbCom pages would read with a group like that. I'm hoping that Opabinia runs again. She makes a great deal of sense. [[Special:Contributions/108.175.233.87|108.175.233.87]] ([[User talk:108.175.233.87#top|talk]]) 20:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
:At a guess, none or almost none of them would be interested. It's more a lovely dream of how to-the-point and sane the ArbCom pages would read with a group like that. I'm hoping that Opabinia runs again. She makes a great deal of sense. [[Special:Contributions/108.175.233.87|108.175.233.87]] ([[User talk:108.175.233.87#top|talk]]) 20:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
||
::I agree with you. Regards, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 21:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:02, 14 November 2017
Hi. If you want to recruit good candidates to run for ArbCom, the most productive thing might be to suggest running to them directly, on their talkpages. (FYI, I agree with many of your suggestions, although I know that at least some are unlikely to be interested, especially among those who have served before.) Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- At a guess, none or almost none of them would be interested. It's more a lovely dream of how to-the-point and sane the ArbCom pages would read with a group like that. I'm hoping that Opabinia runs again. She makes a great deal of sense. 108.175.233.87 (talk) 20:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with you. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)