Jump to content

Template talk:University of Oxford: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
|style="padding-left:0.6cm"|Navigation templates are essentially like the [[Yellow Pages]]: Dull, boring, alphabetically-ordered and practical. While I understand the desire to make Wikipedia's presentation less boring (believe me, I do), the navigation template isn't the place to do so. Ask yourself this: Do the shields help navigation in the context of the template? If one has not lived in Oxford c. 13th century, the answer is probably "no". What does? Categorizing, alphabetizing, and ''simplifying'' more than anything else. [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 23:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
|style="padding-left:0.6cm"|Navigation templates are essentially like the [[Yellow Pages]]: Dull, boring, alphabetically-ordered and practical. While I understand the desire to make Wikipedia's presentation less boring (believe me, I do), the navigation template isn't the place to do so. Ask yourself this: Do the shields help navigation in the context of the template? If one has not lived in Oxford c. 13th century, the answer is probably "no". What does? Categorizing, alphabetizing, and ''simplifying'' more than anything else. [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 23:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
|}
|}

== Proposed change ==

The template currently lists [[Institute of Archaeology (Oxford)|Archaeology]] and [[Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art|Archaeology of the History of Art]] as separate departments, but they were both merged into the School of Archaeology in 2000. The university's web page only recognises the School of Archaeology as a department,<ref>http://www.ox.ac.uk/about/divisions-and-departments</ref> and the other two institutes are now referred to as sub-departmental sites.<ref>https://www.arch.ox.ac.uk/rlaha.html</ref> Both institutes still have their own wiki pages that can be accessed via the [[School of Archaeology, University of Oxford|School of Archaeology]] page, and replacing these two links with one will also make the template smaller. [[User:Amys eye|Amys eye]] ([[User talk:Amys eye|talk]]) 09:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:50, 3 June 2019

WikiProject iconUniversity of Oxford Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconHigher education Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Getting too complicated?

Are the recent edits to this template really desirable? It started off fairly clean and simple, but lots of stuff of marginal interest has been added over the last few months, and I'm not at all convinced by the "spicing up" in the latest version. What do other people think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan A Jones (talkcontribs) 12:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, we should discuss changes here before introducing icons into the template. I think it isn't desirable for a navbox which is intended for navigation. Aloneinthewild (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Aloneinthewild: I felt it helped seperate the colleges a bit. As it currently is, it just feels a bit too much like a monotonous block of text to me. Bellezzasolo Discuss 15:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Third opinion request made 21:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request :
Navigation templates are essentially like the Yellow Pages: Dull, boring, alphabetically-ordered and practical. While I understand the desire to make Wikipedia's presentation less boring (believe me, I do), the navigation template isn't the place to do so. Ask yourself this: Do the shields help navigation in the context of the template? If one has not lived in Oxford c. 13th century, the answer is probably "no". What does? Categorizing, alphabetizing, and simplifying more than anything else. François Robere (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed change

The template currently lists Archaeology and Archaeology of the History of Art as separate departments, but they were both merged into the School of Archaeology in 2000. The university's web page only recognises the School of Archaeology as a department,[1] and the other two institutes are now referred to as sub-departmental sites.[2] Both institutes still have their own wiki pages that can be accessed via the School of Archaeology page, and replacing these two links with one will also make the template smaller. Amys eye (talk) 09:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]