User talk:Tenchwood Pie

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Tenchwood Pie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

uuNBLOCK ME I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG, EXCEPT FOR MAKING GOOD CONTRIBUTIONS

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=uuNBLOCK ME I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG, EXCEPT FOR MAKING GOOD CONTRIBUTIONS |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=uuNBLOCK ME I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG, EXCEPT FOR MAKING GOOD CONTRIBUTIONS |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=uuNBLOCK ME I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG, EXCEPT FOR MAKING GOOD CONTRIBUTIONS |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Let us be reasonable; we are building an encyclopedia. How can you justify adding to it a picture of your dog? Do you imagine the Encyclopedia Brittanica would include it? No difference.--Anthony.bradbury 18:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

There is everything wrong with it. However much you appreciate your dog, he does not merit an encyclopedia article.--Anthony.bradbury 18:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Let us not be silly. Your dog, however clever and however lovable, does not merit an encyclopedia article. --Anthony.bradbury 18:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Scruffy

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Anthony.bradbury 18:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Your Doggy is certainly edible; properly cooked, delicious at that

Yes, your dog is edible. So is your cat and your parrot. Actually, so's your sister, but that would be illegal.

Scruffy

I am not responsible for the above comment, which I do not approve of; as the article is now under {{AfD}}, let us just await concensus.--Anthony.bradbury 18:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I am responsible. I like dogs. Of course, it all depends on the chef, ja?DocEss 18:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

READ THIS NOW

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as READ THIS NOW. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -FisherQueen 18:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! Wildthing61476 18:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense

The article merited speedy deletion. Please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion Review if you have any further complaint. Also, please remain civil regarding edits such as these: [1] and [2] or you will be blocked. Bastiq▼e ^demandez 18:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you for making personal attacks, creating articles to make a point, in which you violated our policy about legal threats. If you really wish to have an article on Scruffy, please take Bastique's advice in 24 hours.—WAvegetarian•(talk) 18:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)