Jump to content

User talk:Davidc2070: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wmkalbach (talk | contribs)
Provided peer review
proper section header according to talk page guidelines
 
Line 21: Line 21:
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->


'''Archival Appraisal Peer Review'''
== Archival Appraisal Peer Review ==


Hey David, this is Willem from class. You've really done some work on the [[Archival appraisal]] article. Improvements in clarity and easy to read additions to Jenkinson's contributions stand out the most to me. If anything at all, I would suggest more in-text citations under the sections for Schellenberg and Macro-appraisal. Best, [[User:Wmkalbach|Wmkalbach]] ([[User talk:Wmkalbach|talk]]) 03:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Hey David, this is Willem from class. You've really done some work on the [[Archival appraisal]] article. Improvements in clarity and easy to read additions to Jenkinson's contributions stand out the most to me. If anything at all, I would suggest more in-text citations under the sections for Schellenberg and Macro-appraisal. Best, [[User:Wmkalbach|Wmkalbach]] ([[User talk:Wmkalbach|talk]]) 03:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:39, 29 April 2018

Davidc2070, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Davidc2070! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Archival Appraisal Peer Review

[edit]

Hey David, this is Willem from class. You've really done some work on the Archival appraisal article. Improvements in clarity and easy to read additions to Jenkinson's contributions stand out the most to me. If anything at all, I would suggest more in-text citations under the sections for Schellenberg and Macro-appraisal. Best, Wmkalbach (talk) 03:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]