Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Addison: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Your assessment
Line 17: Line 17:
::::::::Dear [[User:Exemplo347|Exemplo347]], yes it's rather borderline. I'll still stick with <s>'''Delete'''</s> for now, so let's see what consensus emerges. Thanks, and best regards, [[User:GorgeCustersSabre|George Custer&#39;s Sabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 09:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::::Dear [[User:Exemplo347|Exemplo347]], yes it's rather borderline. I'll still stick with <s>'''Delete'''</s> for now, so let's see what consensus emerges. Thanks, and best regards, [[User:GorgeCustersSabre|George Custer&#39;s Sabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 09:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::Hi {{ping|Exemplo347}} and {{ping|GorgeCustersSabre}}, Addison has met two of the criteria at [[WP:MUSICBIO]], documented through the independent reliable sources I have listed. Therefore, saying that Addison is "not at all notable" is not true. In addition, I don't exactly think that the AllMusic biography is not "in-depth". [[User:Zingarese|Zingarese]] ([[User talk:Zingarese|talk]]) 01:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::Hi {{ping|Exemplo347}} and {{ping|GorgeCustersSabre}}, Addison has met two of the criteria at [[WP:MUSICBIO]], documented through the independent reliable sources I have listed. Therefore, saying that Addison is "not at all notable" is not true. In addition, I don't exactly think that the AllMusic biography is not "in-depth". [[User:Zingarese|Zingarese]] ([[User talk:Zingarese|talk]]) 01:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::Dear [[User:Zingarese|Zingarese]], what you consider true may not be the same as what another editor considers true. It’s best not to try to dictate to us the meaning of evidence. We disagree. That’s our right. Best wishes, [[User:GorgeCustersSabre|George Custer&#39;s Sabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 05:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Dear [[User:Zingarese|Zingarese]], what you consider true may not be the same as what another editor considers true. It’s best not to try to dictate to me the meaning you see in any evidence. We disagree over it. That’s my right. It’s not personal. Best wishes, [[User:GorgeCustersSabre|George Custer&#39;s Sabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 05:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
*'''<s>Weak</s> keep''' as [[WP:Creative]]. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC).
*'''<s>Weak</s> keep''' as [[WP:Creative]]. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC).

Revision as of 05:54, 25 May 2018

Susan Addison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet the requirements of WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Also fails to meet WP:NPROF and WP:MUSICBIO. In short, nothing exists out there that isn't purely run-of-the-mill coverage of a working musician doing their job. As you can see, I went through all of the possible notability criteria that would apply and examined their thresholds for inclusion - unfortunately none of them provide a reason that this person should have a Wikipedia entry. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please provide sources that match the Biography of Living Persons Policy's strict requirements? Exemplo347 (talk) 17:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Her biography at Allmusic and at Discogs, as well as this Guardian piece and BBC article about her playing Elgar's own trombone state that she was in the CBSO for five years, was a founding member (and principal trombone) of the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment (no. 6), and featured in recordings for not only Philips and Decca like I mentioned, but also on RCA, Hyperion, Erato, Decca, and Harmonia Mundi (no. 5). Zingarese (talk) 17:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well that just looks like basic verification rather than in-depth stuff. @GorgeCustersSabre: What do you think? It's very very borderline, but if it persuades you, I'm happy to withdraw. Give me a ping. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Exemplo347, yes it's rather borderline. I'll still stick with Delete for now, so let's see what consensus emerges. Thanks, and best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Exemplo347: and @GorgeCustersSabre:, Addison has met two of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO, documented through the independent reliable sources I have listed. Therefore, saying that Addison is "not at all notable" is not true. In addition, I don't exactly think that the AllMusic biography is not "in-depth". Zingarese (talk) 01:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Zingarese, what you consider true may not be the same as what another editor considers true. It’s best not to try to dictate to me the meaning you see in any evidence. We disagree over it. That’s my right. It’s not personal. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]