Jump to content

User talk:Nitramrekcap: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
This month's winner is RNA interference!
Line 93: Line 93:


{{MCB AID|current=proteasome|last=adenosine triphosphate}} &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 22:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
{{MCB AID|current=proteasome|last=adenosine triphosphate}} &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 22:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

== This month's winner is [[RNA interference]]! ==

{{MCB AID|current=RNA interference|last=proteasome}} &ndash; [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 14:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:40, 2 December 2006

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck! JFW | T@lk 22:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Capital letters

Please refrain from posting your opinions using all capital letters. It is rude, and makes useful collaboration difficult. I am fairly certain you are also user:80.47.142.143, and this goes for "him" as well. If I am mistaken in this assertion, please let me know. - Halidecyphon 10:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crick

Hallo Martin- I reverted your (extensive) cut and pasted reviews because a) they were just blatant advertising; b) there is a potential copyright issue- it is not acceptable to simply cut and paste material from other sources. If you want to draw attention to what may be a new source for the article, then you would be best to include a SHORT paragraph explaining that a new text is available, and perhaps a link to a decent external review. An alternative would to simply read the book and add (with proper references) any useful information to the article proper, rather than the talk page. It's probably best NOT to link directly to Amazon unless really necessary however, as this is considered 'linkspam' by some (links to commercial websites are a bit of a no-no). Please bear in mind that the Francis Crick talk page is for discussing changes to that article- it is not a general bulletin board for discussing his life and work. All the best, Badgerpatrol 14:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caius stained glass and F. Crick

Hey, don't worry about your comments being too negative — not only are you entirely right, but I found the additional information that you provided to be very interesting. Keep up the good work ! Schutz 09:53, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It's a real change to receive a bouquet, rather than a brickbat!! I am still on the trail of the 1958 chair of Genetics issue - as I believe in leaving no stone unturned. regards, Martin

As a piece of well-meant advice Martin- the brickbats might occur less frequently if it weren't for the fact that you implicitly or explicitly insult other contributors with almost every comment you make. Civility is a necessity on this encyclopaedia, not a luxury. Badgerpatrol 19:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear "Shutz",

Two down and four to go! What about Sherrington, Green, Fisher, and Chadwick?

Well done (so far)!

NitramrekcapmpNitramrekcap

I have uploaded the image about Fisher already, see article Ronald Fisher. I have the one for Sherrington as well, which I will upload soon. Unfortunately, when I was in Caius College, I did not have much time and took only the 4 photos of the windows celebrating Venn, Fisher, Crick and Sherrington, but did not manage to get the other two. I don't know of a place where these images would be available under a copyright licence free enough to allow us to upload them on Wikipedia.
PS. My Wikipedia login name is "Schutz", with a "c".
PPS. If you want to leave me a message, please do it on my talk page, and not on my user page, thank you. Schutz 13:33, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sherrington is done; as I wrote, it's the last picture that was in my files. Schutz 20:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

high jump

"the bar has been raised!" <-- Do you have any specific changes/additions in mind? --JWSchmidt 18:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point: have YOU from reading the first 25% of it? Nitramrekcap 18:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I previously passed my comments on to you. From reading the first 25%, I did not feel that Ridley produced the kind of book that I enjoy. "Discoverer of the code" strikes me as the kind of book that is published in order to cash in on the death of a famous person. It strikes me as having been heavily edited in order to increase its "mass market appeal". I find it very hard to read such a book when it does not bother to cite its sources. Given its failure to cite sources, I doubt if it can fruitfully be used as a source for Wikipedia. On the more general issue of expanding the Wikipedia article on Crick in order to say more about his work on the code, I have no doubt that improvements could be made to that section of the article. However, doing so is not a high priority for me. There are many other topics that are of equal or gereater importance in biology that still have not found there way into Wikipedia. I'd rather work getting that information into Wikipedia than expand on and modify what seems to me an adequate section of the Crick article. --JWSchmidt 20:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon review

<Sigh>. Fair enough "Martin", I shan't revert again for the moment, because there seems to be very little point on a sunny evening... Just out of interest, a) why have you posted the Amazon review, and what do you hope to achieve by cutting and pasting it to the Crick talk page?, and b) why is it impossible to link to the Amazon review externally? It's commendable if you're worried about linkspam, but this case is possibly acceptable, you can canvass the opinion of others on that. Anyway, for your consideration, here are a selection of potentially useful links for you- this one, regarding the proper use of talk pages (which shouldn't generally be used to post massive amounts of useless or near useless cut and pasted text, which may be considered a copyright violation and hence illegal), and these ones [1] [2] for general wiki protocol, which may be useful to you. Thank you for signing in properly, for once, it's unfortunate that you can't do it more often! Badgerpatrol 18:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject Newsletter!

We have a new newsletter!
As you've no doubt noticed, there's a new Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject newsletter, which will be sent out about once a month to all WP:MCB members. This newsletter is designed to perform two equally important functions. Firstly (and obviously, perhaps) it will serve to inform the members of the MCB project of such things as important discussions, votes, and article improvement drives. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the periodic correspondance will hopefully encourage a greater level of participation from the MCB community by acting as a gentle reminder of many of the the interesting tasks that are awaiting completion. If you prefer to receive this newsletter in the form of a link, or not receive it at all, you can add your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Newsletter/Opt Out List.
New project feature: MCB Article Improvement Drive
Have any pet MCB subjects that you think need attention? Have you been longing to be part of a team of like-minded editors working toward a common goal? If so, the MCB Article Improvement Drive is for you! On the first of every month a new article is selected by the MCB with the goal of promoting it to good article status. Make your nominations and cast your votes now, because the first article will be chosen on September 1!
In an effort to organize and motivate the MCB activities, it has recently been proposed that a member of the MCB project take the role of "director", who would be responsible for the administrative side of the MCB project, including but not limited to coordinating recruiting efforts, spamming the newsletter, and maintaining the Article Improvement Drive and MCB Portal. A special discussion/vote page has been created for this proposal, and the vote will run until 23:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC), unless the community decides otherwise.
Odds and ends: what else you got?
Signed...
ClockworkSoul
06:39, Sunday August 27, 2006 (UTC)
If you wish to opt out of having the newsletter posted on your talk page in the future, you may add yourself to the opt out list
Newsletter concept and layout blatantly "borrowed" from the Esperanza newsletter
.

This month's WP:MCB Article Improvement Drive article

ClockworkSoul 22:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject Votes

The Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject has recently opened two surveys that will help to decide the direction of the project. First, nominations are currently being accepted for the position of coordinator of the project. Second, votes and additional suggestions for the official title of that position are also being taken. As a member of the project, we hope that you'll drop by and voice your opinion. – ClockworkSoul 03:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This month's WP:MCB Article Improvement Drive article

ClockworkSoul 21:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more vote for the coordinator of the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject

Since two of the three editors nominated for Coordinator of the MCB Wikiproject declined their nominations, one more vote has been posted: should the remaining nominee, ClockworkSoul, be named as the coordinator, or should nominations be reopened? Every opinion counts, so please vote! – ClockworkSoul 17:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject Newsletter

The project main page has gotten a facelift!
When people visit the project, the very first thing that they see tends to be the project's main page, and with this in mind, the main page has been completely overhauled. To enhance readability the various "goals" sections have been merged, and a detailed "how you can help" section has been added. To increase accessibility for more established members, the links to any resources that were in the main body text have been moved onto the navigation bar on the right. Finally, the whole page has been nicely laid out and given a nice attractive look.
New project feature: peer review
I'm proud to announce the addition of out newest feature: peer review! The MCB peer review feature aims serve as a stepping stone to improve articles to featured article status by allowing editors to request the opinions of other members about articles that they might not otherwise see or contribute to.
Project progress
The article worklist
We’ve had quite a bit of progress on the worklist article in the past month. Not only has the list itself nearly doubled in size from 143 to 365 entries, but an amazing three articles have been advanced to FA status, thanks in great part to the efforts of our very own TimVickers! Remember, the state of the worklist is the closest thing we have to quantifying the progress of the project, so if you get the chance, please take a look at the list, pick a favorite article, and improve it!
Collaboration of the Month
Last month's Collaboration of the Month, cell nucleus, was a terrific success! In one month, the article went from a dismal stub to an A-class article. Many thanks to all of the collaborators who contributed, especially ShaiM, who took on the greatest part of the burden. This month's Collaboration of the Month, adenosine triphosphate, isn't getting nearly the attention of its predecessor, so if you can, please lend a hand!
Finally...
The project has a new coordinator, ClockworkSoul! The role - my role - of coordinator will be to harmonize the project's common efforts, in part by organizing the various tasks required to make the project run as smoothly and completely as possible. Many thanks to those who supported me and those participated in the selection process.
If you wish to opt out of having the newsletter posted on your talk page in the future, you may add yourself to the opt out list
Newsletter concept and layout blatantly "borrowed" from the Esperanza newsletter
.

This month's winner is proteasome!

ClockworkSoul 22:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This month's winner is RNA interference!

ClockworkSoul 14:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]