Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz Allen: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:56, 23 September 2018

Liz Allen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Only sources are about her books, and her claims to fame and other promotional crap are unsourced. » Shadowowl | talk 18:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC

Delete per nom - fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Could be a WP:PROMO violation and/or a case of WP:G11. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page is inadequate and under-referenced, but Allen is a figure in Irish journalism. Keep. Bmcln1 (talk) 12:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies GNG and AUTHOR with multiple periodical book reviews. The Irish Times has a review of her book "The Set Up" [1]. There are reviews of her book "Last to Know" in the Irish Independent (29 May 2004), the Irish Times Weekend Review (12 June 2004), Ireland on Sunday (13 June 2004), VIP (13 June 2004) and Irish World (18 June 2004). There are over six hundred library holdings of her books: [2]. James500 (talk) 04:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No matter how many times you say it, it does not make it true: library holdings are not an indication of notability, even if you would like to invent and promote that policy in multiple AFDs.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but rewrite. The Riih Times articles above are good. I removed two non-RS sources from Goodreads. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 11:56, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per James500. /Julle (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *The page is inadequate and under-referenced, but Allen is a figure in Irish journalism. '''Keep'''. [[User:Bmcln1|Bmcln1]] ([[User talk:Bmcln1|talk]]) 12:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 *'''Keep.''' Satisfies GNG and AUTHOR with multiple periodical book reviews. The Irish Times has a review of her book "The Set Up" [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/the-set-up-1.479813%3Fmode%3Damp]. There are reviews of her book "Last to Know" in the Irish Independent (29 May 2004), the Irish Times Weekend Review (12 June 2004), Ireland on Sunday (13 June 2004), VIP (13 June 2004) and Irish World (18 June 2004). There are over six hundred library holdings of her books: [http://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-nb2005012031/]. [[User:James500|James500]] ([[User talk:James500|talk]]) 04:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
+::No matter how many times you say it, it does not make it true: library holdings are not an indication of notability, even if you would like to invent and promote that policy in multiple AFDs.[[User:ThatMontrealIP|ThatMontrealIP]] ([[User talk:ThatMontrealIP|talk]]) 15:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' but rewrite. The Riih Times articles above are good. I removed two non-RS sources from Goodreads. [[User:ThatMontrealIP|ThatMontrealIP]] ([[User talk:ThatMontrealIP|talk]]) 11:56, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''', per James500. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 11:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)