Talk:Supply chain management

Archives (Index)

2012 2013 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2021

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Merge from Certified Supply Chain Professional

I just a completed a merge from Certified Supply Chain Professional to the Certification section. Feel free to edit for better integration into the main article. Looking over the work, it is my impression that the big cert organization table, while referenced at some level, probably has quite a lot of synthesis, per WP:SYNTHESIS, in its creation. It may be better to delete it, but I will leave that to the experts to determine. --Mark viking (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

I was looking at it last night; will clean it up this evening when I get home. I recalled a lot of OR involved in the article. Kuru (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Red links - what are they?

what are the red links that dont click are they errors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happydaise (talk • contribs) 21:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Removed text at the bottom of the page

I've just removed the following text from the bottom of the page (below the footer templates), which was out of place and didn't fit with the rest of the article:

Different part of Supply Chain Management 1. Engineering : Have many part of supply chain in Engineering sector, Such as Factory, Mill, Power plant, Fuel field, Shipyard, IT farm & Medical sector. 2. Non Engineering: This is the part of Non Engineering Farm, Bank, School, College, University, Research foundation, Social organisation. 3. General : This is the general part of SCM. which sector miscellaneous department of Supply chain field.

If it's at all useful, then someone familiar with the subject can add it into the relevant place. Nzd (talk) 19:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Comparison of supply chain certification programmes

I have added Template:Split to Supply chain management § Topics addressed by selected professional supply chain certification programmes, proposing that this section be split into a new article titled Comparison of supply chain certification programmes, because the table seems too large and specific for this summary article (see also User:Mark viking's reservations about this table mentioned above). I also suggest:

• the background of each cell of the table should be colored (a different color for "high" and "low") to make the table easier to scan visually,
• the titles of each row should be sentence case where appropriate per MOS:CAPS, not capitalized as they are currently, and
• the titles of each row should be wiki-linked to any appropriate articles.

I don't have time to make these changes myself right now, so I am noting them here. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 18:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Certifications can be created as a new page

I request the certifications as suggested be created as a separate page.

Sukumaran s (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Sukumaran

References missing

A lot of references are missing. For Example (Akkerman, 2001) is mentioned in the text but there is no reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.45.12.231 (talk) 10:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)