Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangina (2): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Mangina]]: redirect is ok |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
**'''Comment''': I rather suspect that if it is just redirected, someone will come along and recreate it anyway. '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 09:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
**'''Comment''': I rather suspect that if it is just redirected, someone will come along and recreate it anyway. '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 09:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
***But it at least gives readers a clue the term has actually been used in the movie. The {{tl|deletedpage}} says nothing informative at all. [[User:Kavadi carrier|Kavadi carrier]] 09:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
***But it at least gives readers a clue the term has actually been used in the movie. The {{tl|deletedpage}} says nothing informative at all. [[User:Kavadi carrier|Kavadi carrier]] 09:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
****Something like [[kitten huffing]] and [[Uncyclopedia]]? |
****<s>Something like [[kitten huffing]] and [[Uncyclopedia]]?</s> No, kitten huffing was never a real article. Still, redirecting sounds alright by me. Not ''great'', but OK. '''[[User:riana_dzasta|riana]]_[[User talk:riana_dzasta|dzasta]]''' 09:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:32, 9 November 2006
I don't know what state this article was in at the time of its first AfD, but it appears to have had a rather traumatic image on it [1], [2]. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. I recommend that users coming to give their opinions here should look at the article's log, and also that if the article is deleted, it should be protected to prevent recreation. riana_dzasta 08:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- If it was indeed used in Deuce Bigalow, redirect there; otherwise delete as dictdef. Kavadi carrier 09:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I rather suspect that if it is just redirected, someone will come along and recreate it anyway. riana_dzasta 09:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- But it at least gives readers a clue the term has actually been used in the movie. The {{deletedpage}} says nothing informative at all. Kavadi carrier 09:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Something like kitten huffing and Uncyclopedia?No, kitten huffing was never a real article. Still, redirecting sounds alright by me. Not great, but OK. riana_dzasta 09:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- But it at least gives readers a clue the term has actually been used in the movie. The {{deletedpage}} says nothing informative at all. Kavadi carrier 09:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I rather suspect that if it is just redirected, someone will come along and recreate it anyway. riana_dzasta 09:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)