Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Gloria (shoe retailer): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:51, 15 January 2019

La Gloria (shoe retailer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Could not find significant coverage in reliable sources. CNMall41 (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article from El Nuevo Día is significant coverage, and El Nuevo Día,a leading newspaper in Puerto Rico, is a reliable source. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:22, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One source does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. If that were the case, any company would pretty much qualify for its own Wikipedia page.--CNMall41 (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep, a legendary company in Puerto Rico. Antonio Fingerman Martin (dilo aqui!) 04:48, 15 January, 2019 (UTC)

Why "strong" based on a single source pointed out above? "Legendary" is not part of the criteria for WP:NCORP which is what would be required to keep the page. Since Wikipedia is based on sources and not reputation of a company, can you point out the references that would meet WP:CORPDEPTH?--CNMall41 (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Despite no web coverage, the article passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Sheldybett (talk) 07:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Strong keep''', a legendary company in Puerto Rico. ''[[User:AntonioMartin|Antonio Fingerman Martin]]'' ([[User talk:AntonioMartin|dilo aqui!]]) 04:48, 15 January, 2019 (UTC)
 ::Why "strong" based on a single source pointed out above? "Legendary" is not part of the criteria for [[WP:NCORP]] which is what would be required to keep the page. Since Wikipedia is based on sources and not reputation of a company, can you point out the references that would meet [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]?--[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
+* '''Keep''' Despite no web coverage, the article passes [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. [[User:Sheldybett|Sheldybett]] ([[User talk:Sheldybett|talk]]) 07:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)