Jump to content

Talk:Mary Oliver: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Article appeared on In The News, added {{ITN Talk}} banner to talkpage (T7)
Line 29: Line 29:


[[User:Amysayrawr|amysayrawr]] 16:36, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
[[User:Amysayrawr|amysayrawr]] 16:36, May 4, 2005 (UTC)

:Get cracking, this article is super bare bones for someone so well loved, and so someone so good. Careful with the "influences". That can get you into speculation, and is pretty irrelevant imho. Anyways - go for it! [[Special:Contributions/184.69.174.194|184.69.174.194]] ([[User talk:184.69.174.194|talk]]) 04:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)


==Quote==
==Quote==

Revision as of 04:41, 19 January 2019

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmyers14 (article contribs).

Things I'd like to add:

  • Influences: Millay, especially in Oliver's early work; James Wright, her mentor at Ohio State; Whitman; British Romantics (Blake, Wordsworth, Keats); perhaps May Swenson?
  • Her development over time. Moving way away from tightly-structured poems toward prose poems?
  • Discussion of Oliver's popular appeal (rare for a "critically-acclaimed" poet). This would be a good place to address the common criticism that her language is simplistic and repetitive. Does she deliberately make her work accessible?
  • How she approaches nature: joyful without being sentimental/naive
  • "Non-nature" themes: eg, her father, Buddhism, the Holocaust
  • Oliver's own scholarly interests
  • Quotations, of course, in support of topics above
  • A photograph of Oliver, and perhaps of the Provincetown wetlands

amysayrawr 16:36, May 4, 2005 (UTC)

Get cracking, this article is super bare bones for someone so well loved, and so someone so good. Careful with the "influences". That can get you into speculation, and is pretty irrelevant imho. Anyways - go for it! 184.69.174.194 (talk) 04:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quote

Which book is it out of: "Is the soul solid, like iron? Or is it tender and breakable, like the wings of a moth or the beak of an owl?" (because I would like to place one or two quotes in the article). Thanks, Scriberius 06:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plagerism

About this whole article is plagerised from [1]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivity

Was this article written by Mary Oliver? There are many effusive praises of Mary Oliver, which do little to improve our understanding of her work, and not a single criticism. Something more balanced would be nice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.221.67.157 (talk) 00:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable sentence

"It is rumored that during this time she had a questionable relationship with Sarah Whittier."

She had a what?? WP isn't supposed to be about rumours and euphemisms, people. Let's spell it out and give it a source. Flapdragon (talk) 08:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated material

This paragraph shows up twice. It should be removed from Early Live, I think: "Oliver and Cook, her partner of forty years and literary agent, made their home together, largely in Provincetown, Massachusetts, where they lived until Cook's death in 2005, and where Oliver still lives. [5]Greatly valuing her personal privacy, Oliver has given very few interviews, saying she prefers for her writing to speak for itself." Cgmusselman (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Span (talk) 21:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.beacon.org/contributorinfo.cfm?ContribID=1299
    Triggered by \bbeacon\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]