Periodontal diagnosis and classification: Difference between revisions
Added more detail to the tooth mobility classification Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:Grade II: Moderately more than normal (1-2mm horizontal movement) |
:Grade II: Moderately more than normal (1-2mm horizontal movement) |
||
:Grade III: Severe mobility (>2mm horizontal <u>or</u> any vertical movement) |
:Grade III: Severe mobility (>2mm horizontal <u>or</u> any vertical movement) |
||
: |
|||
:Tooth mobility can also be classified using the Miller Classification: |
:Tooth mobility can also be classified using the Miller Classification: |
||
:* Class 1: < 1 mm(Horizontal) |
:* Class 1: < 1 mm(Horizontal) |
||
Revision as of 17:47, 27 January 2019
In dentistry, numerous types of classification schemes have been developed to describe the teeth and gum tissue in a way that categorizes various defects. All of these classification schemes combine to provide the periodontal diagnosis of the aforementioned tissues in their various states of health and disease.
Alveolar ridge deficiency
In 1983, Seibert classified alveolar crestal defects:[1]
Class I: buccolingual loss of tissue with normal apicocoronal ridge height
Class II: apicocoronal loss of tissue with normal buccolingual ridge width
Class III: combination-type defects (loss of both height and width)
Furcation defect
Gingival recession
The magnitude of a receding gumline, commonly referred to as the measurement of gingival recession, is most often described using Miller's classification:[2]
- Class I: Recession that does not extend to the mucogingival junction
- Class II: Recession that extends to or beyond the mucogingival junction, but without loss of interproximal clinical attachment
- Class III: Recession that extends to or beyond the mucogingival junction, with either loss of interproximal clinical attachment or tooth rotation
- Class IV: Recession that extends to or beyond the mucogingival junction, with either interproximal clinical attachment or tooth rotation that is severe
A new classification has been proposed to classify gingival and palatal recessions. The new classification system gives a comprehensive depiction of recession defect that can be used to include cases that cannot be classified according to earlier classifications. A separate classification system for palatal recessions (PR) is also proposed. The new classification system is more detailed, informative and tries to overcome the limitations of Miller's classification system. A wide array of cases which cannot be classified by application of Miller's classification, can be classified by application of Kumar & Masamatti's Classification.[3]
Tooth mobility
As a general rule, mobility is graded clinically by applying firm pressure with either two metal instruments or one metal instrument and a gloved finger.[4]
- Normal mobility
- Grade I: Slightly more than normal (<0.2mm horizontal movement)
- Grade II: Moderately more than normal (1-2mm horizontal movement)
- Grade III: Severe mobility (>2mm horizontal or any vertical movement)
- Tooth mobility can also be classified using the Miller Classification:
- Class 1: < 1 mm(Horizontal)
- Class 2: >1 mm(Horizontal)
- Class 3: > 1 mm (Horizontal+vertical mobility)
References
- ^ Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed partially edentulous ridges using full thickness onlay grafts: Part I - technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1983;4:437-453
- ^ Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1985;5(2):9-13.
- ^ Kumar A, Masamatti SS. A new classification system for gingival and palatal recession. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:175-81.
- ^ Carranza, FA: Clinical Diagnosis. In Newman, MG; Takei, HH; Carrana FA, editors: Carranza's Clinical Periodontology, 9th Edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 2002. page 439.