User talk:Mgbo120: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2019/February; 2019/March;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:10, 30 March 2019

Draft:Analena Jentsch

Hello, just wondering why my edit on the draft Analena Jentsch page was declined when the Emira Abbes page has the same amount of references. Thanks

Try adding more references.~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know I’m just asking why the Emira Abbes page that has the same references is a page when the Draft:Analena Jentsch page isn’t. Thanks TracyFleuryFan (talk) 19:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question about review process for Draft:Electromagnetic Radio Frequency Convergence

Hey,

Thanks for your comment on the wiki page for electromagnetic RF convergence. I beleive I have addressed your comment (and added citations to the lead section). I am not all too familiar with the review process and wanted to know what the next steps are. Do I wait for you or another reviewer to review the page? Also do I leave your comment up and wait for someone to remove it or do I simply remove it? I'd appreciate any information or help you could provide.

Thanks Achiriya (talk) 00:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Achiriya Good job. it will be reviewed by any reviewer. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tiamat's Wrath - two versions

Hello -- it appears that shortly after you moved the article on Tiamat's Wrath to draftspace: Draft:Tiamat's Wrath, I re-started the article in the main article space: Tiamat's Wrath without having known about the prior version. I believe that my version is adequately sourced (please feel free to check me on that). Do you have any suggestion on how to prevent folks from working on the draft while the main article exists? Delete the draft? Something else? Thanks! -Kenirwin/(talk) 01:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pomio Kivung

By what standard did you consider the article on Pomio Kivung to be undersourced? There are two, thorough, academic-quality sources cited, with inlines for both. Do I need more inlines? I’d firmly disagree if you mean that there need to be more than two academic sources for this rather obscure religious phenomenon. Kielbasa1 (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kielbasa1, Try adding more refs to boost the page. From my judgement, the refs you have are not enough.~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The issue seems to me to pass notability standards easily, and there isn't a single claim made in the article not backed up by reliable references. I see that you mostly deal with biographies, but three published academic references (from well-respected anthropologists) about a single religious phenomenon in Papua New Guinea is well enough. You can't just say "it doesn't have enough sources", the quality of those sources matters. There is nothing whatsoever in WP:NOTE or WP:CITE about a minimum number of references, which would be a ridiculous requirement in any case.

I don't know if you have access to the references, or if you're at all informed about religious anthropology in general, but going forward I would strongly recommend that you look into the nature and quality of references before passing a crude judgement about their quantity. Kielbasa1 (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm SportingFlyer. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sabzak Pass, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SportingFlyer T·C 23:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mgbo120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not in any way connected to the User:Musbaunow. I guess, this may be an IP error or something else. I don't have any other account aside from this. I've not been disruptive in my edits. Please review and consider unblocking my account.

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Yunshui, Thanks for the quick review. Honestly, I don't know User:Musbaunow nor have any connections with that account. I'm wrongly linked to it. I believe this is a mistake.

If you refer to "behavioural" evidence, I guess my account is quite different from that. I've been working on WP:NPR and WP:ACF for quite some months now since I was granted access. I have been active for some months now.

If you refer to "technical evidence", I have been using an IP from my local mobile service provider. I'm willing to provide my IP or any evidence required privately to you to clear my account from this issue. I'm also willing to answer further questions as may be required. Thanks~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 09:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mgbo120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Honestly, I don't know User:Musbaunow nor have any connections with that account. I'm wrongly linked to it. I believe this is a mistake.

If you refer to "behavioural" evidence, my edits are quite different from that of User:Musbaunow and others listed there . I've been working on WP:NPR and WP:ACF for quite some months now since I was granted access. I have been active for some months now.

I have carefully checked all those wiki accounts listed in that sockpuppet. I have never reviewed nor patrolled any draft or new page written by User:Musbaunow and others listed. I don't understand how my account got linked to the list.

If you refer to "technical evidence", I have been using an IP from my local mobile service provider since I became a WP:AFC reviewer. My IP has been 41.190.30.166 as I see it when I check in Google. Never changed it since then.

Please consider unblocking me. I guess my edits have never been distruptive by any means.

Thanks.~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 00:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Honestly, I don't know [[User:Musbaunow]] nor have any connections with that account. I'm wrongly linked to it. I believe this is a mistake.

If you refer to "behavioural" evidence, my edits are quite different from that of [[User:Musbaunow]]  and others listed there . I've been working on [[WP:NPR]] and [[WP:ACF]] for quite some months now since I was granted access. I have been active for some months now.

I have carefully checked all those wiki accounts listed in that sockpuppet. I have never reviewed nor patrolled any  draft or new page written by [[User:Musbaunow]] and others listed.  I don't understand how my account got linked to the list. 

If you refer to "technical evidence", I have been using an IP from my local mobile service provider since I became a [[WP:AFC]] reviewer.   My IP has been  41.190.30.166  as I see it when I check  in Google.  Never changed it since then. 

Please consider unblocking me. I guess  my edits have never been distruptive by any means.

Thanks.[[User talk:Mgbo120|<span style="color: red">'''~~Cheers~~'''</span>]][[User:Mgbo120|<span style="color: blue">'''Mgbo120'''</span>]] 00:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Honestly, I don't know [[User:Musbaunow]] nor have any connections with that account. I'm wrongly linked to it. I believe this is a mistake.

If you refer to "behavioural" evidence, my edits are quite different from that of [[User:Musbaunow]]  and others listed there . I've been working on [[WP:NPR]] and [[WP:ACF]] for quite some months now since I was granted access. I have been active for some months now.

I have carefully checked all those wiki accounts listed in that sockpuppet. I have never reviewed nor patrolled any  draft or new page written by [[User:Musbaunow]] and others listed.  I don't understand how my account got linked to the list. 

If you refer to "technical evidence", I have been using an IP from my local mobile service provider since I became a [[WP:AFC]] reviewer.   My IP has been  41.190.30.166  as I see it when I check  in Google.  Never changed it since then. 

Please consider unblocking me. I guess  my edits have never been distruptive by any means.

Thanks.[[User talk:Mgbo120|<span style="color: red">'''~~Cheers~~'''</span>]][[User:Mgbo120|<span style="color: blue">'''Mgbo120'''</span>]] 00:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Honestly, I don't know [[User:Musbaunow]] nor have any connections with that account. I'm wrongly linked to it. I believe this is a mistake.

If you refer to "behavioural" evidence, my edits are quite different from that of [[User:Musbaunow]]  and others listed there . I've been working on [[WP:NPR]] and [[WP:ACF]] for quite some months now since I was granted access. I have been active for some months now.

I have carefully checked all those wiki accounts listed in that sockpuppet. I have never reviewed nor patrolled any  draft or new page written by [[User:Musbaunow]] and others listed.  I don't understand how my account got linked to the list. 

If you refer to "technical evidence", I have been using an IP from my local mobile service provider since I became a [[WP:AFC]] reviewer.   My IP has been  41.190.30.166  as I see it when I check  in Google.  Never changed it since then. 

Please consider unblocking me. I guess  my edits have never been distruptive by any means.

Thanks.[[User talk:Mgbo120|<span style="color: red">'''~~Cheers~~'''</span>]][[User:Mgbo120|<span style="color: blue">'''Mgbo120'''</span>]] 00:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Could you please visit the talk page of Murburn/Murcat Concept?

@Mgbo120:
Dear Sir, Dr. Mgbo120,
Could you please re-visit the talk page of Murburn/Murcat Concept? A message awaits the page Draft talk:Murburn/Murcat concept
I apologise for this unsolicited message and sincerely hope that I have not violated any directives of wikipedia. Regards,
Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC) =[reply]

Josh Jung

Mgbo120, I am struggling on finding places to put references. As you can tell I'm new to Wikipedia and I suck at references. Anyway you could help me find somewhere to put references? Thanks- Schoolboyboy (talk)14:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]