Jump to content

Talk:Thought: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 75: Line 75:
That the universe/cosmos is also observation itself...
That the universe/cosmos is also observation itself...


Can we propose to ourselves that we may be only just seeing our thoughts...
Can we propose to ourselves that we may be only just seeing our thoughts<ref>Observation reconsidered, Jerry Fodor, Philosophy of Science 51 (March):23-43 (1984)
Abstract
Several arguments are considered which purport to demonstrate the impossibility of theory-neutral observation. The most important of these infers the continuity of observation with theory from the presumed continuity of perception with cognition, a doctrine widely espoused in recent cognitive psychology. An alternative psychological account of the relation between cognition and perception is proposed and its epistemological consequences for the observation/theory distinction are then explored</ref>...


I am my thoughts, I am not my thoughts, to be or not to be kind of stuff...
I am my thoughts, I am not my thoughts, to be or not to be kind of stuff...


That our evolution may need to use thought to allow observation...
That our evolution may need to use thought to allow observation...

Go for the consensus...[[User:Arnlodg|Arnlodg]] ([[User talk:Arnlodg|talk]]) 23:02, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:02, 17 June 2019

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Template:Vital article

A larger wiki forum on this area may be found at sense-think-act.org which may be of interest to contributors to this area... Szczels 12:57, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thought as an abstract form

The brain generates and uses countless abstract forms/objects. The elemental abstract forms are thoughts (as elemental organic forms are cells), the most complex are skills, sciences, languages etc. Abstract forms/objects, although non-dimensional (shapeless), are energetically real (not 'imaginary'), as material forms are real (telekinesis, moving material objects/forms with thoughts, is a direct proof of that). Quantum physicist David Bohm (see: Thought as a System) among many others, also realized this, and dedicated many of his efforts bringing up the importance of thoughts to humankind: "Thought runs you. Thought, however, gives false info that you are running it, that you are the one who controls thought. Whereas actually thought is the one which controls each one of us..."

According to Rupert Sheldrake every abstract form, like every organic form, relates to a certain morphic field.

Unsigned comment

I came to this entry hoping to see various psychophysical, epigenetic, or perhaps esoteric(new thought, rosecrucians, theosophists etc.) hypotheses to the question "what is thought?" Surely a thought or abstraction is a thing composed of matter an energy. I found the entry to be quite unsatisfying.

merge with idea

what's the difference between a thought and an idea?!

That answer is online here - http://cnx.org/content/m14812/latest/

also, many differences and the relationship between thoughts, emotions and feelings is discussed in my online book "The Psychology of Emotions, Feelings and Thoughts" online here - http://cnx.org/content/m14358/latest/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.248.163.183 (talk)

Thinking effects

Result 1:

Favors in thinking comes from lacking of understanding how something works in life.

Example: Business Business owners use the limitations of human's education abilities as a tool for producing primary products for customers use for a profit range which changes as the economic cycle turns in stages.

Ex: TV mational and international People's lacking in knowing hoe electronics use electric energy for powering up a TV device.

So animation and vibraion from audio to reproduce a copy of a recording that will have fans amazed for centuries.


So this is one example that cause a business to be great from having people use there limits in understanding as a main source to buiness gains.


So everything is all about what people know and what people don't know. Key concept (patterns in life)

make paragraph: Components of thought

  1. material, a circuit and individual specific subunits
  2. idealized (because they can work even as a simulation or can be materialized biologically, electronically, mechanically or combinatorially):
    1. information
    2. different memory entries
    3. connections-pathways of memory
    4. hubs of information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4104:9000:69A4:4383:8E60:DB0F (talk) 15:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cognitive Science

This subject EXPLICITLY studies the mind and its precesses. However, it is composed of many subjects including AI, Psychology, Philosophy, Linguistics etc... Should some of these subjects be replaced since cognitive science "absorbs" them? After all, the field is dedicated to it.

Is thought independent of Observation

That the universe/cosmos is also observation itself...

Can we propose to ourselves that we may be only just seeing our thoughts[1]...

I am my thoughts, I am not my thoughts, to be or not to be kind of stuff...

That our evolution may need to use thought to allow observation...

Go for the consensus...Arnlodg (talk) 23:02, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Observation reconsidered, Jerry Fodor, Philosophy of Science 51 (March):23-43 (1984) Abstract Several arguments are considered which purport to demonstrate the impossibility of theory-neutral observation. The most important of these infers the continuity of observation with theory from the presumed continuity of perception with cognition, a doctrine widely espoused in recent cognitive psychology. An alternative psychological account of the relation between cognition and perception is proposed and its epistemological consequences for the observation/theory distinction are then explored