Jump to content

Talk:Certified Information Systems Security Professional: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Modiorne (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
AlephGamma (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
==Criticism Added==
==Criticism Added==
There are many people who dislike the CISSP for what they feel are legitimate reasons. I've added information about this to help balance this otherwise skewed-positive article. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:157.238.209.10|157.238.209.10]] ([[User talk:157.238.209.10|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/157.238.209.10|contribs]]) 21:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>
There are many people who dislike the CISSP for what they feel are legitimate reasons. I've added information about this to help balance this otherwise skewed-positive article. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:157.238.209.10|157.238.209.10]] ([[User talk:157.238.209.10|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/157.238.209.10|contribs]]) 21:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>
:Positive skew, no spin/zero spin. '''[[Valspeak|What-ever!]]'''. <personnal observation> Negative comments, to some people AKA criticism (criticism != critique) do not balance an article </personnal observation>. [[User:Luis F. Gonzalez|Luis F. Gonzalez]] 01:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


I added a clarification to the Criticism section regarding the requirement to be sponsored by another CISSP. --[[User:Modiorne|Mark Odiorne, CISSP]] 10:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
I added a clarification to the Criticism section regarding the requirement to be sponsored by another CISSP. --[[User:Modiorne|Mark Odiorne, CISSP]] 10:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:03, 25 December 2006

Page Moved

This page has been moved from CISSP. CISSP now redirects here (Certified Information Systems Security Professional). I cleaned up related requests in this talk page. --J Morgan(talk) 21:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Added

There are many people who dislike the CISSP for what they feel are legitimate reasons. I've added information about this to help balance this otherwise skewed-positive article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 157.238.209.10 (talkcontribs) 21:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Positive skew, no spin/zero spin. What-ever!. <personnal observation> Negative comments, to some people AKA criticism (criticism != critique) do not balance an article </personnal observation>. Luis F. Gonzalez 01:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a clarification to the Criticism section regarding the requirement to be sponsored by another CISSP. --Mark Odiorne, CISSP 10:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]