Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sh2-9

Sh2-9

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sh2-9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 06:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 06:48, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Perhaps you could also have a look here. Cheers, UnaToFiAN-1 (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

• Keep - the itwiki page linked above says that it's visible to the naked eye, which satisfies criterion 1 of WP:NASTCRIT. Article needs significant expansion, but the subject does appear sufficiently notable. creffett (talk) 02:09, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

• Keep - looks like it can be expanded easily. Fotaun (talk) 00:15, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
• Keep - This object is visible to the naked eye. It can be expanded, though. Let me do a bit of expansion for it. SkyFlubbler (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Apparently, the nebula is very visible and surrounds Sigma Scorpii system. SIMBAD has the same designation of this nebula and Sigma Sco. Maybe I suggest we must merge it with that star article with a separate section? SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Its a lot easier to categorize if we leave it as a nebula article. Fotaun (talk) 16:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)