User talk:Jonny Abet: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:12, 21 January 2020

This is Jonny Abet's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jonny Abet/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jonny Abet/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonny Abet! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonny Abet (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jonny Abet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jonny Abet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jonny Abet! You created a thread called Jonny Abet at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Mental Health Act 2007. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. A-NEUN ⦾TALK⦾ 19:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 20:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mental Health Act 2007. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.

Again, please do not add "how-to" instructions to Wikipedia articles. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page, User:Jonny Abet

Your user page, User:Jonny Abet, should be used to introduce you to other editors as a Wikipedia editor. Some brief biographical information, it is not a good place to start an article about yourself. In this edit] your summary says Still trying to make this eligable as an article please advise specifically what I may be missing

The first thing you are missing as that, as stated in our guideline on autobiography it is strongly discouraged for you to write any article about yourself, anywhere.
The next thing is that your user page is not the place to start any article.
The third thing is that Wikipedia has articles only about notable topics. If you are notable, your user page is a long way from showing that.
The fourth thing is that articles should have a logical structure and convey meaningful information to the reader. Your user page does not seem to me, currently, to do that.

I advise you to abandon the idea of your user page as an article, (or any article about yourself) and simply construct an ordinary user page in accord with WP:UP. You may look at my user page for an example, or look at the user pages of other experienced editors.

Note that a user page is optional. Some very experienced users do not have one. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 * The first thing you are missing as that, as stated in [[WP:AUTOBIO|our guideline on autobiography]] it is '''strongly''' discouraged for you to write any article about yourself, anywhere.
 * The next thing is that your user page is not the place to start any article.
-*The third thing is that Wikipedia has articles only about [[WP:N|notable]] topics. If your are notable, your user page is a long way from showing that.
+*The third thing is that Wikipedia has articles only about [[WP:N|notable]] topics. If you are notable, your user page is a long way from showing that.
-*The fourth thing is that articels should ahve a logic structure and convey meaningful information to the reader. Your user page does not seem to me, currently, to do that.
+*The fourth thing is that articles should have a logical structure and convey meaningful information to the reader. Your user page does not seem to me, currently, to do that.
-I advise you to abandon the idea of your user page as an article, and simply construct an ordinary user page in accord with [[WP:UP]]. You may look at [[User:DESiegel|my user page]] for an example, or look at the user pages of other experienced editors.
+I advise you to abandon the idea of your user page as an article, (or any article about yourself) and simply construct an ordinary user page in accord with [[WP:UP]]. You may look at [[User:DESiegel|my user page]] for an example, or look at the user pages of other experienced editors.
 Note that a user page is optional. Some very experienced users do not have one. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 22:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)