Jump to content

Talk:Caroline Flack: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DanBCDanBC (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:
::::D'oh. I guess that doesn't make it any more true, then. Sorry. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 19:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
::::D'oh. I guess that doesn't make it any more true, then. Sorry. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 19:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
:::::Please note that in the UK "suicide" is a conclusion (verdict) that coroners come to, and there hasn't been an inquest yet. That's why none of the sources use the word suicide. I don't know if Wikipedia wants to pre-empt the coroners court, or if it wants to use the alternative wording given by the sources instead. [[User:DanBCDanBC|DanBCDanBC]] ([[User talk:DanBCDanBC|talk]]) 00:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
:::::Please note that in the UK "suicide" is a conclusion (verdict) that coroners come to, and there hasn't been an inquest yet. That's why none of the sources use the word suicide. I don't know if Wikipedia wants to pre-empt the coroners court, or if it wants to use the alternative wording given by the sources instead. [[User:DanBCDanBC|DanBCDanBC]] ([[User talk:DanBCDanBC|talk]]) 00:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
::::::I've removed the few uses of "suicide" from the article and replaced with either simply death or the more common (in the UK) "took her own life", which avoids the legal definition you mention above and also the awkward sounding "died by suicide", which barely features on British English sources.  — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 00:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2020 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2020 ==

Revision as of 00:25, 16 February 2020

Filmography

Why is there a Filmography here ? What films has she appeared in ? Jamie Stuart (talk) 12:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Filmography" is a generic tern and we don't use the word "Televisionography". Do you have an alternative suggestion? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oeuvre perhaps? All the best: Rich Farmbrough (the apparently calm and reasonable) 22:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Wow, that sounds bit grand. What about just "Television" as the main heading? Martinevans123 (talk) 23:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2020

SHE IS DEAD 15 FEBRUARY 2001:B07:645F:AC96:A597:D83D:7FC:CC85 (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is already mentioned in the article. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2020

Change date of death from 15th February 2020 to 14th February 2020 Hazard321 (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source to back this up? GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cause of death

I hit an edit conflict with Gorilla Warfare (to whom thanks) trying to delete the reference from The Sun. Can all editors please remember that UK red tops and tabloids, including The Mail, Express and Sun are not reliable. - SchroCat (talk) 18:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see there are quite a few sources now saying "suspected suicide". Martinevans123 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And The Independent says plainly here: "A lawyer for the Flack family confirmed that Caroline took her own life and was found in her east London flat." Martinevans123 (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, agreed that it's sufficiently reflected in the reliable sources now. The tabloids are always the first to report things like this, but they're also more willing to be wrong. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added with The Indy as the source. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinevans123: The information was already in the article right before the sentence you added. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
D'oh. I guess that doesn't make it any more true, then. Sorry. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that in the UK "suicide" is a conclusion (verdict) that coroners come to, and there hasn't been an inquest yet. That's why none of the sources use the word suicide. I don't know if Wikipedia wants to pre-empt the coroners court, or if it wants to use the alternative wording given by the sources instead. DanBCDanBC (talk) 00:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the few uses of "suicide" from the article and replaced with either simply death or the more common (in the UK) "took her own life", which avoids the legal definition you mention above and also the awkward sounding "died by suicide", which barely features on British English sources.  — Amakuru (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2020

Date of Death: 15th February 2020 (Age 40) 51.52.204.133 (talk) 18:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already reflected in the article. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

I don't think that her death is contentious. It's an undisputed fact. Are refs needed in the main body AND in the lead section AND in the infobox? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Given its recency I think it's worth doing at least in the lead and the body. I added them to the infobox because initially that was one of the only places in the article that mentioned her death, but I don't object to them being removed from there. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I'm not sure they are required in the lead by policy? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:LEADCITE, I think it's worth leaving them—it is potentially contentious given that she has so recently been reported dead. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ok. I've never understood it that way. I guess individual circucmstances vary anyway. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reputable sources

The page was edited to include her death before reputable sources were found to support the fact. However now that there is reputable and undisputed evidence of this, the section regarding her death could likely be removed and the citations in the infobox too. GSSNYC (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She's dead. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This has been confirmed by reliable sources including the BBC, who have confirmed her death with her family. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - I don't dispute that, this was explaining why there was excessive references and citations. I was responding to Martinevans123's point in the Refs section. I edited the page myself to include the BBC citation. GSSNYC (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it would be clearer if you responded in the same section. Her death should at least be mentioned in the article body somewhere—whether in its own section or not I don't really care either way. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. Sorry for the understanding. The phrase "the section regarding her death could likely be removed" threw me somewhat. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem - I've edited to make that a bit clearer. GSSNYC (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did - my response got moved by someone. It's been moved to the section in the page given that the policy on including it in the lead is only for if the death is particularly notable, which as of now it is not reported to be. GSSNYC (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GSSNYC, I moved your comment to this new thread as I misunderstood what you meant. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah - hopefully my edit makes this clearer now. GSSNYC (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]