Talk:11:11: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
TheRingess (talk | contribs) m reply |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Okay so, TheRingess doesn't seem to like me adding my well-researched and cited article. First he deleted it because it was "original research" (even though it wasn't), now he's deleting it because the page is a disambig page, even though there's no rule against turning a disambig page in to a regular article. If 11:11 is not a recognized phenomenon then why do we need a disambig page at all? Why are there no disambig pages for 11:10 and 11:12 hmm I wonder... -- [[User:GIR|GIR]] 00:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
Okay so, TheRingess doesn't seem to like me adding my well-researched and cited article. First he deleted it because it was "original research" (even though it wasn't), now he's deleting it because the page is a disambig page, even though there's no rule against turning a disambig page in to a regular article. If 11:11 is not a recognized phenomenon then why do we need a disambig page at all? Why are there no disambig pages for 11:10 and 11:12 hmm I wonder... -- [[User:GIR|GIR]] 00:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Actually for a long time I've wished that this page did not exist at all. The simplest answer to why it exists is because fellow editors wish it to. Your previous assertion that all of the articles referenced in the page deal with the synchronicity belief; is not proven. The simplest answer as to why there are no articles for 11:10 and 11:12 is that no one has yet desired to create one. (that's assuming that they don't exist, I didn't check). For that matter, anyone can create a page for any time of the day if they so desire. [[User:TheRingess|TheRingess]] 00:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Redirect == |
== Redirect == |
||
Revision as of 00:29, 19 December 2006
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Original Research! Disambig Page!
Okay so, TheRingess doesn't seem to like me adding my well-researched and cited article. First he deleted it because it was "original research" (even though it wasn't), now he's deleting it because the page is a disambig page, even though there's no rule against turning a disambig page in to a regular article. If 11:11 is not a recognized phenomenon then why do we need a disambig page at all? Why are there no disambig pages for 11:10 and 11:12 hmm I wonder... -- GIR 00:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Actually for a long time I've wished that this page did not exist at all. The simplest answer to why it exists is because fellow editors wish it to. Your previous assertion that all of the articles referenced in the page deal with the synchronicity belief; is not proven. The simplest answer as to why there are no articles for 11:10 and 11:12 is that no one has yet desired to create one. (that's assuming that they don't exist, I didn't check). For that matter, anyone can create a page for any time of the day if they so desire. TheRingess 00:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Redirect
I redirected this page to synchronicity. For several reasons.
- The article contained a list of references to the time in 11:11 in popular songs. Those references can be included in each song's articles.
- The article contained a list of books. If the books are notable enough, they should have their own articles.
- No one has supplied any references to any sociological references to how widespread this belief is, where it originated from, etc. It seems overkill to have an article for every single synchronicity that people might believe in.
- The only other section was a see also. Again any reference to 11:11 can be included on the individual articles.