User talk:J.S. Clingman

File:Unplanned promotional poster.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Non-free content use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically User:J.S. Clingman/Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi J.S. Clingman. Non-free content such as File:Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches logo.jpg cannot be used in userboxes or on user pages per Wikipedia non-free content use criterion #9 (also see WP:UBX#Caution about image use and WP:UP#Non-free files). If you'd like to add an image to the userbox you've created, please use something from Wikimedia Commons instead. I previously removed the CREC logo from your userbox, but you subsequently re-added it. Please don't do so again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Oh! Thanks for the notification! I didn't realize that was the policy here or that you had removed the image purposely. I thought I'd somehow saved an unfinished version of it. It will not happen again! EomereofRohan (talk) 20:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 11:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. D. Smith (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S. D. Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S. D. Smith, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, J.S. Clingman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Kendrick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overcomer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingdom Studios (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kingdom Studios and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kingdom Studios, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 11:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't understand. Was the problem that Deadline Hollywood and Fox News aren't reliable? As far as I know, each source mentions the subject multiple times (and the subject's name appears in the headline in at least 10 out of the approximately 15 sources). I suppose a few of the sources did only mention the subject, such as the Fox News headline. If I remove those, will the article be ready for resubmission? Or is the problem that the sources that did mention the subject more than once are not considered reputable? Thank you. —J.S. Clingman Fëalórin, A Child of God (talk) 13:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Never mind. I'll review my sources before I bring this up again. Thank you for taking the time to review my submission.—J.S. Clingman Fëalórin, A Child of God (talk) 14:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi J.S. Clingman! You created a thread called On uploading images for draft articles not yet approved or submitted at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi J.S. Clingman! You created a thread called RT audience scores at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi J.S. Clingman! You created a thread called First-hand sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi J.S. Clingman! You created a thread called Sources and tables at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingdom Studios has been accepted

Kingdom Studios, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks so much!—J.S. Clingman Fëalórin, A Child of God (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CCO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Kendrick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overcomer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:S. D. Smith concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:S. D. Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madeline Carroll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indivisible (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:S. D. Smith

Hello, J.S. Clingman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "S. D. Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Celebritynetworth.com as a source

Hi J.S. Clingman. I noticed that you recently used Celebritynetworth.com as a source for biographical information in Michael J. Lindell. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the info!—J.S. Clingman Fëalórin, A Child of God (talk) 22:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Woodlawn (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifeline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:I Still Believe OST.png

Thank you for uploading File:I Still Believe OST.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Still Believe (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloodshot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 19:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 19:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian right, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian right, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

American Underdog

Hey! I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edits to American Underdog: The Kurt Warner Story back to a redirect. Per WP:NFF, there must be verifiable evidence that a film has entered filming/main production to have a stand-alone article. I would encourage you to start a Draft for the article if you would like to work on expanding it before then. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 00:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)