User talk:ErbekBozok: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:30, 9 May 2020

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, TRT World. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 15:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to TRT World. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. -◊PRAHLAD^Balaji 16:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not censoring, the paragraph criticism is not justified to present such channel. This would mean that you should not censor the same for other articles on other state owned channels that are exactly doing the same and are financed or owned by their State... check RT, check France 24 articles. ErbekBozok (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have remarked by reading simple articles about Turkey / Turkish that Wikipedia authorizes and blindly accepts many sided articles without proposing different point of views. This is propaganda when it is one sided. I thought Wikipedia is meant to be a universal encyclopedia and not a place to blasphème and give ones opinion and not the other. Please be careful about such situation. ErbekBozok (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some people may not agree; discuss it on the talkpage first. -◊PRAHLAD^Balaji 16:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:22, 9 May 2020 edit ErbekBozok (talk \| contribs) 22 edits No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:30, 9 May 2020 edit undo Prahlad balaji (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 23,030 edits →May 2020 Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I have remarked by reading simple articles about Turkey / Turkish that Wikipedia authorizes and blindly accepts many sided articles without proposing different point of views. This is propaganda when it is one sided. I thought Wikipedia is meant to be a universal encyclopedia and not a place to blasphème and give ones opinion and not the other. Please be careful about such situation. [[User:ErbekBozok\|ErbekBozok]] ([[User talk:ErbekBozok#top\|talk]]) 16:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)		I have remarked by reading simple articles about Turkey / Turkish that Wikipedia authorizes and blindly accepts many sided articles without proposing different point of views. This is propaganda when it is one sided. I thought Wikipedia is meant to be a universal encyclopedia and not a place to blasphème and give ones opinion and not the other. Please be careful about such situation. [[User:ErbekBozok\|ErbekBozok]] ([[User talk:ErbekBozok#top\|talk]]) 16:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

			Some people may not agree; discuss it on the talkpage first. -[[User:Prahlad balaji\|◊<u><b style="color:#095">PRAHLAD</b></u>]][[User talk:Prahlad balaji\|<sup style="color:#707">Balaji</sup>]] 16:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)