Talk:White Lines (Don't Don't Do It): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 04:16, 22 December 2006

Template:Stubclass

Songs Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Title

Have I been mis-reading it for the past 25 years or does the title of this song really have two "don't"'s? -- eo 20:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it listed both ways, but Whitburn lists it with two, so I suppose that's as good a way to leave it as any, unless somebody has an actual copy of the single. GassyGuy 00:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge White Lines (Duran Duran song) into White Lines (Don't Don't Do It)

Also support merge with the Duran Duran article on this song... there's barely any info there anyway. -- eo 20:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also support the merge. GassyGuy 00:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. DON'T MERGE! This is a completely different release than Grandmaster Flash's! - Feduciary 16:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Here we go again. It's the same song, however you put it; the article can only be enriched by including all versions. –Unint 03:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral; I wouldn't necessarily object as the DD article is pretty slim, but I think it could be expanded, and it'd be a shame to lose its parallels with other DD singles articles. See also my opinion at Talk:Perfect Day. — Catherine\^talk 18:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: As was said above, I'd support an expansion of the DD section, but I don't think they need to be merged. The DD page is an entry in their discography, and should be separate. I think the small blurb in the Grandmaster Flash page is sufficient enough. KhanadaRhodes 04:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * '''Support'''. Here we go again. It's the ''same song'', however you put it; the article can only be enriched by including all versions. –[[User:Unint|Unint]] 03:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Neutral'''; I wouldn't necessarily object as the DD article is pretty slim, but I think it could be expanded, and it'd be a shame to lose its parallels with other DD singles articles.  See also my opinion at [[Talk:Perfect Day]].  &mdash; [[User:CatherineMunro|Catherine]]\<sup>[[User_talk:CatherineMunro|talk]]</sup> 18:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
-* '''Oppose''': As was said above, I'd support an expansion of the DD section, but I don't think they need to be merged. The DD page is an entry in their discography, and should be separate. I think the small blurb in the Grandmaster Flash page is sufficient enough. [[User:Khanadarhodes|KhanadaRhodes]] 04:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Khanadarhodes
+* '''Oppose''': As was said above, I'd support an expansion of the DD section, but I don't think they need to be merged. The DD page is an entry in their discography, and should be separate. I think the small blurb in the Grandmaster Flash page is sufficient enough. [[User:Khanadarhodes|KhanadaRhodes]] 04:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)