User talk:Bamnamu

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bamnamu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Regarding you edit in North Korea

First of all, you must admit the fact that North Koreans don't participate in wikipedia, and most of the materials that deal with Korea(even North Korean content) is translated in South Korean hangul, not North Korean hangul. Which means that what you're saying is the same as saying we should apply 두음법칙 to every word to balance the two countries. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 20:41, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm not on any side(either South or North) of Korea, but we should admit that 'North' is literally translated as '북' in both South and North Korea. The word 한 is different as North Korea does not call Korea as 한국. I don't mind if you reverted what I have put in, but just remember, 북한 is used in South Korea, almost 100% case except for diplomacy, when we seldom use the term '북측'(North Side) as well. Cheers. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 20:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

By the way, 두음법칙 is an important language difference between South and North and if you want to balance words between two countries, we should consider applying this rule as well, which burdens with more workload. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 21:03, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Looking back at the history of your edits, it seems that you're either Korean or in proficient in Korean. Please share your comments and suggestions any time. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

How about putting 북한(South Korean convention) and 북조선(North Korean convention) at the same time? Looking at the page of Mount Kumgang, there is a Korean word(금강산) besides English. What do you think? B2V22BHARAT (talk) 21:20, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

It seems that North Korea calls 'Korea' as 조선인민공화국, or simply 조선, while South Korea calls 'Korea' as 한국. That's why there's a confusion when referring to North Korea: South: 북 + 한

North: 북 + 조선.

북 is same in both North and South Korea. What do you think? B2V22BHARAT (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Also aside from the talk of North Korea page editing, Kim il seong did not established Kim dyansty by himself. He was mostly helped by Stalin and Soviet Union. Cheers. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 21:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi B2V22BHARAT. I'm fine with [1] and [2]. Bamnamu (talk) 00:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Okay thanks for replying. If something changes, please feel free to revert or change my editing. B2V22BHARAT (talk) 00:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Dispute at Hanbok

I'm asking for this as you were a recently involved editor at Hanbok. Esiymbro and I are currently at dispute on whether origins of Hanbok tracing back to Scythian culture is WP:OR or is based on reliable sources. Your opinion on this dispute would be much appreciated. VeryGoodBoy (talk) 03:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't have the time or energy to get involved. Bamnamu (talk) 07:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

2020

Hey Bamnamu. I noticed you have edited the Prostitution in South Korea page. It's been "locked to protect from vandalism" but I've noticed a lot of opinionated and racist content like "Many Korean men actively seek out Russian women because they satisfy not only their desire for dominance over exotic females but also the latent psychological need to overcome their complex." Or saying that South Korean men are huge child sex tourists while providing links that don't even mention that or providing a source from a specifically opinionated article. Maybe you can help out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1313:5231:406B:1AF2:6094:2E16 (talk) 14:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Please see WP:AUTOCONFIRM, if you want to edit a protected page, and/or WP:EDITREQ, if you want to submit an edit request. Bamnamu (talk) 20:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I have a question.

Hi. I have a question.

First of all, I'm really sorry if I misunderstand you.

But there are many things that are not acceptable to me.

single-purpose account : Watersinfalls, 41.34.93.140 ,102.44.199.16 , 41.232.35.139 , Buzinezz etc

He is a well-known user of viciousness.

He is telling me the keyword "Korea" 'Goryeo' without any stickiness. He made the debate strange.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interracial_marriage => Currently, Most of them were contributed by blocked users.(Buzinezz).

We must erase his contribution.

His contribution is mostly false. He is covering up the relationship between Chinese women and foreign men.

He continues to insult your country. And I was blocking him. But you sued me.

What is the relationship between him and you?Bablos939 (talk) 13:12, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Bablos939. I have no relation to him. I reverted your edit on Interracial marriage to prevent edit warring. Judging by the subsequent bickering on Talk:Interracial marriage and Talk:Miscegenation, I believe what I did was correct, and I'll do it again if necessary.

BTW, did you already forget that you accused me of racism?[3] I take that as a personal attack: "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence."

To me, both of you are troublemakers, so don't expect me to take sides. I normally don't take sides, anyway, so don't take it personally. I don't care about an editor's ethnicity or nationality; I only care about the quality of his or her contributions. I have a low tolerance for incompetence, and I have little respect for single-purpose accounts. You think what you're doing is a good thing, but it's not. You're going to promptly leave after doing what you came here to do, but, unbeknownst to you, other editors, like me, will have to deal with the consequences and/or clean up after you. Both of you need to think about why you're doing this. This doesn't seem to be about China or Korea, to me. This seems to be more about your own insecurities (granted, all humans, including me, have insecurities), which is a shame, because both of you seem to be intelligent and knowledgeable individuals who should have no reason to engage in this behavior.

Bamnamu (talk) 22:28, 4 June 2020 (UTC)