User talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson

Orphaned non-free image File:Old School.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old School.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

"Spoo (food)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spoo (food). Since you had some involvement with the Spoo (food) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 10:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

"Autopsy (2006 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Autopsy (2006 film). Since you had some involvement with the Autopsy (2006 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Autopsy (2006 film)

Hello, this is a notice that Autopsy (2006 film), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) The only 2006 film with autopsy in the title has its own article already.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OcelotCreeper (talk) 00:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Knowhere

The article Knowhere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Knowhere for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knowhere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowhere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Newname

Template:Newname has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)