User talk:Mish2022

November 2020

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lifestyle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.Template:Z186 ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 06:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Travelling Light. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Template:Z187 Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mikhail2022 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikhail2022. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia with my respect and great appreciation

Just wanted to say thanks for giving me the opportunity to understand your policies and systems, i appreciate the time i spent trying to contribute, would ask the respected administrators to delete all the contributions which you rewarded me in return. Mish2022 (talk) 19:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

As your edits were spam, I have tried to revert all of them. However, your edits became the property of Wikipedia the moment you published them, so we don't revert on your demand.--Quisqualis (talk) 07:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Can you hear the logic of your reply, so you say all my spam edits is now valuable and you dont want to delete, i find it difficult to understand your roles, why you create sandbox for new users if you want to block them after using, the bottom line is you don't offer help and feedback to new users, you enjoy blocking them, when i put notable articles sources from valid sources some administrator remove whithout reason then i got blocked because i did amend him eith beter sources, this is your system for fact. Mish2022 (talk) 11:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/08/us/wikipedia-harassment-wikimedia-foundation.html Mish2022 (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Continue without so much improvement, let others build it better please. Mish2022 (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for promotion.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)