Talk:Integrated water resources management: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:03, 23 November 2020

Sanitation NA‑class Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 October 2020 and 29 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mbastola, Teruhiro Shigeno, Sa2001oki (article contribs).

This page needs a reference. 202.6.56.2 04:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dublin principles?

what are they? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.53.38.219 (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

they are 4 statements made in 1992 in a conference held in dublin, but they are not related to IWRM, as stated in the paper "Integrated water resources management - a reassessment ", by biswas, 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.180.58.238 (talk) 09:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add 'Status of IWRM Implementation'

I think it would be better to add a new section with the title 'Status of IWRM Implementation'. Under this title, we will be writing the degree of IWRM implementation in reference to the SDGs data. It will be categorized on the basis of the continent. --Mbastola (talk) 03:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a great suggestion. Sa2001oki (talk) 01:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The lead should include the main points of the article. The lead at the moement may be lacking a few important takeaways of the article so we must revise it and add to it. Sa2001oki (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:03, 23 November 2020 edit Sa2001oki (talk \| contribs) 36 edits suggestion of revision ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:03, 23 November 2020 edit undo Sa2001oki (talk \| contribs) 36 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	: I think that is a great suggestion. [[User:Sa2001oki\|Sa2001oki]] ([[User talk:Sa2001oki\|talk]]) 01:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)		: I think that is a great suggestion. [[User:Sa2001oki\|Sa2001oki]] ([[User talk:Sa2001oki\|talk]]) 01:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

	The lead should include the main points of the article. The lead at the moement may be lacking a few important takeaways of the article so we must revise it and add to it.		The lead should include the main points of the article. The lead at the moement may be lacking a few important takeaways of the article so we must revise it and add to it. [[User:Sa2001oki\|Sa2001oki]] ([[User talk:Sa2001oki\|talk]]) 01:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)