Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hao Hai Ren: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Hao Hai Ren]]: comment for keep voters |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
*'''Delete''', not notable, vanity. [[User:Megan1967|Megan1967]] 02:18, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', not notable, vanity. [[User:Megan1967|Megan1967]] 02:18, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' vanity, fraud target. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 02:57, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' vanity, fraud target. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 02:57, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
||
*Look folks, I'm sure he's a great guy, but is he important/famous enough that encyclopedia users will want to look him up? Wikipedia pages can't just be ignored, they need to be updated and organised... look at [[:Category:New_Zealand_people]], does he really belong with those other people? [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 04:46, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:46, 4 February 2005
Vanity, delete, jguk 22:38, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Unquestionably. Delete. Postdlf 22:40, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The above people are Zealots, the article is not finished, keep, J-Rodd 203.167.202.230 23:01, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I am Willing to shave off my barnet to keep this page, Michael Cheesepuff Sutorious
- Puerile vanity. Delete. -R. fiend 23:17, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Don't DELETE... This page is part of world history!!
- Hao Hai is a role model and somebody the next generation can look up to. This page should be left as a source of inspiration for us all. Anna 23:28, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- A pox on you deletionist hippie creeps. I have created a user page in Hao Hai's name : User:Hao_Hai_Ren, but I suppose you will delete that too. It is because of people like yourselves that Wikipedia has become a joke in the community. For shame.
- Delete. User:203.167.202.230 has certainly been busy editing this VfD page. It's fine at User:Hao Hai Ren, it just doesn't belong in the article space. -- Curps 23:56, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete the article and move the info to a new user page. Sockpuppets, please take note. - Lucky 6.9 00:02, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity, thy name is Hao Hai Ren. Didyaevernotice how the less likely a page is worth keeping, the more sockpuppets come out of the woodwork? RickK 00:34, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I am disgusted by the blatent rascism of all those intending to delete this entry. DO NOT DELETE. Hao Hai Ren is a Kiwi/Asian hero!
- Keep Ian - he is great. Why is everyone getting so worked up about this? Just don't look at the page if you don't like it... ooo what a suggestion...
- Keep I am very troubled that the powers that be would want to delete this corner-stone of wellington history. How can this information be passed down from generation to generation if you hippes keep deleting these entries. have a heart ... keep the page! scobes (fight the good fight)
- Delete and ban the sockpuppets. Gamaliel 01:42, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Regarding accusations of sockpuppetry, there are several of us (distinct people I assure you) that connect through the game gateway (203.167.202.230) - the creator of the page sent this around his colleages, and we expressed our outrage accordingly.
- VfD policy says that anonymous voters and user voters created after the nomination are typically considered null and void. Nothing personal. Having said that, I vote delete. Segekihei 01:47, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity, no claim to notability. JoaoRicardo 02:10, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 02:18, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity, fraud target. Gazpacho 02:57, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Look folks, I'm sure he's a great guy, but is he important/famous enough that encyclopedia users will want to look him up? Wikipedia pages can't just be ignored, they need to be updated and organised... look at Category:New_Zealand_people, does he really belong with those other people? Kappa 04:46, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)