Jump to content

Talk:Kevin Spacey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 65: Line 65:
He is active in this youtube videos as an ''actor'', so he is not retired fully yet. I revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kevin_Spacey&curid=16768&diff=960778254&oldid=959089359 this edit] now. ·[[User:Carn|Carn]]·[[User talk:Carn|<small>!?</small>]] 09:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
He is active in this youtube videos as an ''actor'', so he is not retired fully yet. I revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kevin_Spacey&curid=16768&diff=960778254&oldid=959089359 this edit] now. ·[[User:Carn|Carn]]·[[User talk:Carn|<small>!?</small>]] 09:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
:@[[User:TraktorzystazUrsusa|TraktorzystazUrsusa]] - read and answer on the above, plz ·[[User:Carn|Carn]]·[[User talk:Carn|<small>!?</small>]] 07:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
:@[[User:TraktorzystazUrsusa|TraktorzystazUrsusa]] - read and answer on the above, plz ·[[User:Carn|Carn]]·[[User talk:Carn|<small>!?</small>]] 07:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
:: Come on, posting a video on youtube once a year is not a professional activity. [[User:TraktorzystazUrsusa|TraktorzystazUrsusa]] 08:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2020 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2020 ==

Revision as of 08:29, 18 January 2021

Former good articleKevin Spacey was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 10, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
August 1, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 1, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Vital article

Kevin Spacey Foundation

Hello, I'm not sure how to fix this as the article seems to be locked, but his charity can't be headquartered in two places at once. Rather than saying it was headquartered in England and Wales they seem to be referring to England and Wales the legal jurisdiction, as the charity commission for England and Wales would be the body regulating their work rather than say OSCR in Scotland or the Charity commission for Northern Ireland. It's kind of like saying that JFK airport is in New York and New Jersey because of the involvement of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and should be edited to look less silly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.51.225 (talk) 06:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Spacey's allegations in Synopsis

In the synopsis, it unfairly portrays Stacey as suspicious or even guilty, yet because all of the allegations were dropped, Kevin is allowed to be seen as innocent, yet to address this at the top is often disputed by other editors who have emotional attachments to the subject matter, claiming that 'not guilty' is not the same as charges dropped, and although I agree it's not the same, Kevin was never found guilty, therefore it is perfectly fine to add that he was 'never found guilty', because he wasn't, therefore he is still innocent in the eyes of the law, and whether you're a high profile person or an average joe, everyone has the right to remain innocent until proven guilty You may argue that in the article discusses in detail that he was not found guilty, this is not addressed within the synopsis, so why is it important to show that he was never found guilty within the synopsis? well, the synopsis acts as a "TLDR" (Too long didn't read) where it briefly addresses the article before addressing it all within categories. So I hope that others agree with my view that wiki should be written within factual and impartial context rather than emotional or hearsay. Hogyncymru (talk) 23:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Years active

{{Infobox person}} "active" means person to be active as a person: Date range in years during which the subject was active in their principal occupation(s) and/or other activity for which they are notable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCuuKhjLB0Q - 2019
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZveA-NAIDI - 2018
He is active in this youtube videos as an actor, so he is not retired fully yet. I revert this edit now. ·Carn·!? 09:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TraktorzystazUrsusa - read and answer on the above, plz ·Carn·!? 07:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Come on, posting a video on youtube once a year is not a professional activity. TraktorzystazUrsusa 08:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2020

Please implement this change. 82.132.237.120 (talk) 20:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks for catching that Cannolis (talk) 21:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 July 2020

Please consider the following addition:

After having returned to the stage with the video ‘Let me be Frank’, which attracted millions of views, on August 2 Spacey read four of Gabriele Tinti’s poems inspired by the Boxer at Rest at the National Roman Museum in Palazzo Massimo, where the statue is located.[1][2]. HansBD (talk) 14:46, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Add where? And in any case, this seems rather trivial, not to mention the odd tone with the phrasing "after having returned to the stage ...". –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 17:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Kevin Spacey and writer Gabriele Tinti". Getty Images. 2 August 2019. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  2. ^ "Kevin Spacey reads poem at rome museum". Hollywood Reporter. 2 August 2019. Retrieved 16 July 2020.

The Shipping News

Kevin Spacey starrred in The Shipping News (2002) for which he was nominated best actor by BAFTA and Golden Globe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.152.3.66 (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]