Talk:ABC Learning: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Paul foord (talk | contribs) {{WP Australia|class=start|importance=mid|orphan=yes}} |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WP Australia|class=start|importance=mid|orphan=yes}} |
|||
Excellent work. There needs to be something about the current controversy in which ABC is claiming that the Victorian state government has no right to supervise standards of care in ABC centres. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam]] 04:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
Excellent work. There needs to be something about the current controversy in which ABC is claiming that the Victorian state government has no right to supervise standards of care in ABC centres. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam]] 04:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:08, 12 January 2007
Australia Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Excellent work. There needs to be something about the current controversy in which ABC is claiming that the Victorian state government has no right to supervise standards of care in ABC centres. Adam 04:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. I have a link from Queensland about licensing there Courier Mail and also a case in Supreme Court The Age and The ABC but I don't really understand why they'd be fined and why they'd appeal a $200 fine anyway. I hope someone else knows more. AChan 05:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I added a paragraph which I think put out the issues. AChan 05:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)