Jump to content

Talk:ABC Learning: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AChan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
{{WP Australia|class=start|importance=mid|orphan=yes}}
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP Australia|class=start|importance=mid|orphan=yes}}
Excellent work. There needs to be something about the current controversy in which ABC is claiming that the Victorian state government has no right to supervise standards of care in ABC centres. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam]] 04:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Excellent work. There needs to be something about the current controversy in which ABC is claiming that the Victorian state government has no right to supervise standards of care in ABC centres. [[User:Adam Carr|Adam]] 04:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)



Revision as of 05:08, 12 January 2007

WikiProject iconAustralia Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconABC Learning is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
More information:
Note icon
This article is not assigned to a WikiProject or workgroup. Please help with your suggestions.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Excellent work. There needs to be something about the current controversy in which ABC is claiming that the Victorian state government has no right to supervise standards of care in ABC centres. Adam 04:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have a link from Queensland about licensing there Courier Mail and also a case in Supreme Court The Age and The ABC but I don't really understand why they'd be fined and why they'd appeal a $200 fine anyway. I hope someone else knows more. AChan 05:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a paragraph which I think put out the issues. AChan 05:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]