User talk:Mdyogi: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Yup, I read it. That's why I AfD'ed the article rather than speedied it. The sources are not up to Wikipedia standards. [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 15:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
Yup, I read it. That's why I AfD'ed the article rather than speedied it. The sources are not up to Wikipedia standards. [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 15:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Oh, and on the quotes section. Nothing is wrong with the quote if it is integrated into the article. However, while a "quotes" section used to be part of the article structure on Wikipedia, it has been deprecated. Quotes are no longer put in a section by themselves.... [[User:Jefferson Anderson|Jefferson Anderson]] 15:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:58, 12 January 2007
Namaste
Yogani Article Deletion
Hi Chairboy,
Just wondering why you went ahead and deleted my article after I had contested it and was writing an extremely detailed explanation of why the article had been previously deleted and why it should have a home on Wikipedia. Please let me know. Thanks and have a great day. Mdyogi 19:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Howdy! Please see WP:CSD General criteria, article 4. The community had decided to delete it via the deletion process and it had been removed. Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 19:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've restored the article, thank you for your writeup! Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 20:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Yup, I read it. That's why I AfD'ed the article rather than speedied it. The sources are not up to Wikipedia standards. Jefferson Anderson 15:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and on the quotes section. Nothing is wrong with the quote if it is integrated into the article. However, while a "quotes" section used to be part of the article structure on Wikipedia, it has been deprecated. Quotes are no longer put in a section by themselves.... Jefferson Anderson 15:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)