Fission-fragment rocket: Difference between revisions
m Undid revision 991097327 by Uzairizwan (talk) rvv |
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 3 templates: hyphenate params (1×); |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<sup>242m</sup>Am as a nuclear fuel derive from the fact that it has the highest thermal fission cross section (thousands of [[Barn (unit)|barns]]), about 10x the next highest cross section across all known isotopes. |
<sup>242m</sup>Am as a nuclear fuel derive from the fact that it has the highest thermal fission cross section (thousands of [[Barn (unit)|barns]]), about 10x the next highest cross section across all known isotopes. |
||
<sup>242m</sup>Am is [[fissile]] (because it has an odd number of [[neutron]]s) and has a low [[critical mass]], comparable to that of [[plutonium-239|<sup>239</sup>Pu]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Critical Mass Calculations for <sup>241</sup>Am, <sup>242m</sup>Am and <sup>243</sup>Am |url=http://typhoon.jaea.go.jp/icnc2003/Proceeding/paper/6.5_022.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722105207/http://typhoon.jaea.go.jp/icnc2003/Proceeding/paper/6.5_022.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=22 July 2011 | |
<sup>242m</sup>Am is [[fissile]] (because it has an odd number of [[neutron]]s) and has a low [[critical mass]], comparable to that of [[plutonium-239|<sup>239</sup>Pu]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Critical Mass Calculations for <sup>241</sup>Am, <sup>242m</sup>Am and <sup>243</sup>Am |url=http://typhoon.jaea.go.jp/icnc2003/Proceeding/paper/6.5_022.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722105207/http://typhoon.jaea.go.jp/icnc2003/Proceeding/paper/6.5_022.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=22 July 2011 |access-date=3 February 2011 }}</ref> <ref>Ludewig, H., et al. "Design of particle bed reactors for the space nuclear thermal propulsion program." Progress in Nuclear Energy 30.1 (1996): 1-65.</ref> |
||
It has a very high [[Nuclear cross section|cross section]] for fission, and if in a nuclear reactor is destroyed relatively quickly. Another report claims that <sup>242m</sup>Am can sustain a chain reaction even as a thin film, and could be used for a novel type of [[nuclear rocket]].<ref name=Ronen>{{cite journal|last1=Ronen|first1=Yigal|last2=Shwageraus|first2=E.|title=Ultra-thin 241mAm fuel elements in nuclear reactors|journal=Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A|date=2000|volume=455|issue=2|pages=442–451|doi=10.1016/s0168-9002(00)00506-4|bibcode=2000NIMPA.455..442R}}</ref><ref name=Ronen2> Ronen, Y., and G. Raitses. "Ultra-thin 242mAm fuel elements in nuclear reactors. II." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 522.3 (2004): 558-567.</ref><ref name=Ronen2000>Ronen, Yigal, Menashe Aboudy, and Dror Regev. "A Novel Method for Energy Production Using 242 m Am as a Nuclear Fuel." Nuclear technology 129.3 (2000): 407-417.</ref><ref name=Ronen2006> Ronen, Y., E. Fridman, and E. Shwageraus. "The smallest thermal nuclear reactor." Nuclear science and engineering 153.1 (2006): 90-92.</ref> |
It has a very high [[Nuclear cross section|cross section]] for fission, and if in a nuclear reactor is destroyed relatively quickly. Another report claims that <sup>242m</sup>Am can sustain a chain reaction even as a thin film, and could be used for a novel type of [[nuclear rocket]].<ref name=Ronen>{{cite journal|last1=Ronen|first1=Yigal|last2=Shwageraus|first2=E.|title=Ultra-thin 241mAm fuel elements in nuclear reactors|journal=Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A|date=2000|volume=455|issue=2|pages=442–451|doi=10.1016/s0168-9002(00)00506-4|bibcode=2000NIMPA.455..442R}}</ref><ref name=Ronen2> Ronen, Y., and G. Raitses. "Ultra-thin 242mAm fuel elements in nuclear reactors. II." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 522.3 (2004): 558-567.</ref><ref name=Ronen2000>Ronen, Yigal, Menashe Aboudy, and Dror Regev. "A Novel Method for Energy Production Using 242 m Am as a Nuclear Fuel." Nuclear technology 129.3 (2000): 407-417.</ref><ref name=Ronen2006> Ronen, Y., E. Fridman, and E. Shwageraus. "The smallest thermal nuclear reactor." Nuclear science and engineering 153.1 (2006): 90-92.</ref> |
||
Revision as of 15:27, 24 January 2021
This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2011) |
The fission-fragment rocket is a rocket engine design that directly harnesses hot nuclear fission products for thrust, as opposed to using a separate fluid as working mass. The design can, in theory, produce very high specific impulse while still being well within the abilities of current technologies.
Design considerations
In traditional nuclear thermal rocket and related designs, the nuclear energy is generated in some form of reactor and used to heat a working fluid to generate thrust. This limits the designs to temperatures that allow the reactor to remain whole, although clever design can increase this critical temperature into the tens of thousands of degrees. A rocket engine's efficiency is strongly related to the temperature of the exhausted working fluid, and in the case of the most advanced gas-core engines, it corresponds to a specific impulse of about 7000 s Isp.
The temperature of a conventional reactor design is the average temperature of the fuel, the vast majority of which is not reacting at any given instant. The atoms undergoing fission are at a temperature of millions of degrees, which is then spread out into the surrounding fuel, resulting in an overall temperature of a few thousand.
By physically arranging the fuel into very thin layers or particles, the fragments of a nuclear reaction, can boil off the surface. Since they will be ionized due to the high temperatures of the reaction, they can then be handled magnetically and channeled to produce thrust. Numerous technological challenges still remain, however.
Research
Rotating fuel reactor
A design by the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory[1] uses fuel placed on the surface of a number of very thin carbon fibres, arranged radially in wheels. The wheels are normally sub-critical. Several such wheels were stacked on a common shaft to produce a single large cylinder. The entire cylinder was rotated so that some fibres were always in a reactor core where surrounding moderator made fibres go critical. The fission fragments at the surface of the fibres would break free and be channeled for thrust. The fibre then rotates out of the reaction zone, to cool, to avoid melting.
The efficiency of the system is surprising; specific impulses of greater than 100,000s are possible using existing materials. This is high performance, although not that which the technically daunting antimatter rocket could achieve, and the weight of the reactor core and other elements would make the overall performance of the fission-fragment system lower. Nonetheless, the system provides the sort of performance levels that would make an interstellar precursor mission possible.
Dusty plasma
A newer design proposal by Rodney L. Clark and Robert B. Sheldon theoretically increases efficiency and decreases complexity of a fission fragment rocket at the same time over the rotating fibre wheel proposal.[2] In their design, nanoparticles of fissionable fuel (or even fuel that will naturally radioactively decay) are kept in a vacuum chamber subject to an axial magnetic field (acting as a magnetic mirror) and an external electric field. As the nanoparticles ionize as fission occurs, the dust becomes suspended within the chamber. The incredibly high surface area of the particles makes radiative cooling simple. The axial magnetic field is too weak to affect the motions of the dust particles but strong enough to channel the fragments into a beam which can be decelerated for power, allowed to be emitted for thrust, or a combination of the two. With exhaust velocities of 3% - 5% the speed of light and efficiencies up to 90%, the rocket should be able to achieve over 1,000,000 sec Isp.
Am 242m as nuclear fuel
In 1987 Ronen & Leibson [3][4] published a study on applications of 242mAm (one of the isotopes of americium) as nuclear fuel to space nuclear reactors, noting its extremely high thermal cross section and energy density. Nuclear systems powered by 242mAm require less fuel by a factor of 2 to 100 compared to conventional nuclear fuels.
Fission-fragment rocket using 242mAm was proposed by George Chapline[5] at LLNL in 1988, who suggested propulsion based on the direct heating of a propellant gas by fission fragments generated by a fissile material. Ronen et al.[6] demonstrate that 242mAm can maintain sustained nuclear fission as an extremely thin metallic film, less than 1/1000th of a millimeter thick. 242mAm requires only 1% of the mass of 235U or 239Pu to reach its critical state. Ronen's group at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev further showed that nuclear fuel based on 242mAm, could speed space vehicles from Earth to Mars in as little as two weeks.[7]
242mAm as a nuclear fuel derive from the fact that it has the highest thermal fission cross section (thousands of barns), about 10x the next highest cross section across all known isotopes. 242mAm is fissile (because it has an odd number of neutrons) and has a low critical mass, comparable to that of 239Pu.[8] [9] It has a very high cross section for fission, and if in a nuclear reactor is destroyed relatively quickly. Another report claims that 242mAm can sustain a chain reaction even as a thin film, and could be used for a novel type of nuclear rocket.[6][10][11][12]
Since the thermal absorption cross section of 242mAm is very high, the best way to obtain 242mAm is by the capture of fast or epithermal neutrons in Americium-241 irradiated in fast reactor. However, fast spectrum reactors are not readily available. Detailed analysis of 242mAm production in existing PWRs was provided in.[13] Proliferation resistance of 242mAm was reported by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology 2008 study.[14]
In 2000 Carlo Rubbia at CERN further extended the work by Ronen [15] and Chapline[16] on fission-fragment rocket using 242mAm as a fuel.[17] Project 242[18] based on Rubbia design studied a concept of 242mAm based Thin-Film Fission Fragment Heated NTR[19] by using direct conversion of the kinetic energy of fission fragments into increasing of enthalpy of a propellant gas. Project 242 studied the application of this propulsion system to a manned mission to Mars.[20] Preliminary results were very satisfactory and it has been observed that a propulsion system with these characteristics could make the mission feasible. Another study focused on production of 242mAm in conventional thermal nuclear reactors.[21]
See also
References
- ^ Chapline, G.; Dickson, P.; Schnitzler, B. Fission Fragment Rockets -- A Potential Breakthrough
- ^ Clark, R.; Sheldon, R. Dusty Plasma Based Fission Fragment Nuclear Reactor American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 15 April 2007.
- ^ Ronen, Yigal, and Melvin J. Leibson. "An example for the potential applications of americium-242m as a nuclear fuel." Trans. Israel Nucl. Soc. 14 (1987): V-42.
- ^ Ronen, Yigal, and Melvin J. Leibson. "Potential applications of 242mAm as a nuclear fuel." Nuclear Science and Engineering 99.3 (1988): 278-284.
- ^ Chapline, George. "Fission fragment rocket concept." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 271.1 (1988): 207-208.
- ^ a b Ronen, Yigal; Shwageraus, E. (2000). "Ultra-thin 241mAm fuel elements in nuclear reactors". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A. 455 (2): 442–451. Bibcode:2000NIMPA.455..442R. doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(00)00506-4.
- ^ "Extremely Efficient Nuclear Fuel Could Take Man To Mars In Just Two Weeks" (Press release). Ben-Gurion University Of The Negev. 28 December 2000.
- ^ "Critical Mass Calculations for 241Am, 242mAm and 243Am" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2011. Retrieved 3 February 2011.
- ^ Ludewig, H., et al. "Design of particle bed reactors for the space nuclear thermal propulsion program." Progress in Nuclear Energy 30.1 (1996): 1-65.
- ^ Ronen, Y., and G. Raitses. "Ultra-thin 242mAm fuel elements in nuclear reactors. II." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 522.3 (2004): 558-567.
- ^ Ronen, Yigal, Menashe Aboudy, and Dror Regev. "A Novel Method for Energy Production Using 242 m Am as a Nuclear Fuel." Nuclear technology 129.3 (2000): 407-417.
- ^ Ronen, Y., E. Fridman, and E. Shwageraus. "The smallest thermal nuclear reactor." Nuclear science and engineering 153.1 (2006): 90-92.
- ^ Golyand, Leonid, Yigal Ronen, and Eugene Shwageraus. "Detailed Design of 242 m Am Breeding in Pressurized Water Reactors." Nuclear science and engineering 168.1 (2011): 23-36.
- ^ Kessler, G. "Proliferation resistance of americium originating from spent irradiated reactor fuel of pressurized water reactors, fast reactors, and accelerator-driven systems with different fuel cycle options." Nuclear science and engineering 159.1 (2008): 56-82.
- ^ Ronen1988
- ^ Chapline1988
- ^ Rubbia, Carlo. Fission fragments heating for space propulsion. No. SL-Note-2000-036-EET. CERN-SL-Note-2000-036-EET, 2000.
- ^ Augelli, M., G. F. Bignami, and G. Genta. "Project 242: Fission fragments direct heating for space propulsion—Programme synthesis and applications to space exploration." Acta Astronautica 82.2 (2013): 153-158.
- ^ Davis, Eric W. Advanced propulsion study. Warp Drive Metrics, 2004.
- ^ Cesana, Alessandra, et al. "Some Considerations on 242 m Am Production in Thermal Reactors." Nuclear technology 148.1 (2004): 97-101.
- ^ Benetti, P., et al. "Production of 242mAm." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 564.1 (2006): 482-485.