Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damon M. Cummings: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Peacemaker67 (talk | contribs) →Damon M. Cummings: redir/merge |
TimothyBlue (talk | contribs) →Damon M. Cummings: merge |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Redirect''' to [[USS Damon M. Cummings (DE-643)]]. Fails [[WP:SOLDIER]] (LtCDR posthumously awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and [[WP:GNG]]. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. [[User:Mztourist|Mztourist]] ([[User talk:Mztourist|talk]]) 03:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect''' to [[USS Damon M. Cummings (DE-643)]]. Fails [[WP:SOLDIER]] (LtCDR posthumously awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and [[WP:GNG]]. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. [[User:Mztourist|Mztourist]] ([[User talk:Mztourist|talk]]) 03:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Redirect/merge to the ship''' per Mztourist. It is apparent from the various deletion discussions regarding these single Navy Cross recipients with ships named after them that we need to get a community view on whether having a ship named after you is a “significant award or honour”. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 12:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect/merge to the ship''' per Mztourist. It is apparent from the various deletion discussions regarding these single Navy Cross recipients with ships named after them that we need to get a community view on whether having a ship named after you is a “significant award or honour”. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 12:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge'''to [[USS Damon M. Cummings (DE-643)]] per above. Doesn't pass for a stand alone article, but the content will improve the target article, be less fragmented, and give the content more readership. Per [[WP:N]], ''"Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article."'' The article as a stand alone will receive minimal readership, but as part of the target will receive much more. There is no benefit to fragmenting the content. I ce'd the article to help with the merge. <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b> // [[User:TimothyBlue|Timothy]] :: [[User talk:TimothyBlue|talk]] </b></span> 15:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:17, 25 January 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Damon M. Cummings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor" and so passes WP:ANYBIO. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to USS Damon M. Cummings (DE-643). Fails WP:SOLDIER (LtCDR posthumously awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist (talk) 03:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect/merge to the ship per Mztourist. It is apparent from the various deletion discussions regarding these single Navy Cross recipients with ships named after them that we need to get a community view on whether having a ship named after you is a “significant award or honour”. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Mergeto USS Damon M. Cummings (DE-643) per above. Doesn't pass for a stand alone article, but the content will improve the target article, be less fragmented, and give the content more readership. Per WP:N, "Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." The article as a stand alone will receive minimal readership, but as part of the target will receive much more. There is no benefit to fragmenting the content. I ce'd the article to help with the merge. // Timothy :: talk 15:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)