Jump to content

Talk:The Cloisters: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:The Cloisters/Archive 1) (bot
Line 30: Line 30:
}}
}}
{{archives|search=yes}}
{{archives|search=yes}}

== Bonnefont Cloister ==

Sourcing for the history of the "Bonnefont" cloister dates from the 1970s. Current sources [https://resources.metmuseum.org/resources/metpublications/pdf/creating_the_cloisters.pdf] [https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/474091] [https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/now-at-the-met/features/2012/french-franciscan-cloister] supports the idea that the elements came from a cloister and other monuments in and around Tarbes, not Bonnefont. The section should be updated to reflect this. –[[User:Dlthewave|dlthewave]] [[User_talk:Dlthewave|☎]] 19:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2018 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2018 ==

Revision as of 03:11, 26 January 2021

Featured articleThe Cloisters is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 1, 2018.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 19, 2018Featured article candidatePromoted
April 22, 2018Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Featured article

Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2018

165.50.73.198 (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DBigXray 14:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations

The image 'Limbourg brothers - The Belles Heures of Jean, Duke of Berry' seems wrongly labelled Davidships (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, have fixed this now. Ceoil (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus request for editing introductory statement of "Garden" section.

Section 3.2 begins with a confusing and unrelated fact regarding the use of gardens during the medieval era:

"During periods of political unrest and military invasion, gardens became essential for community survival.[116]"

The source cited (ISBN 978-0-87099-775-4) is text on both the gardens at The Cloisters, and the history of medieval gardens themselves. Though interesting, and perhaps relevant somewhere else in the article, this statement is a non-sequitor in its current context and should be removed from the garden section. Rimless Spectacles 25 January 2021 (UTC)

I think it should probably be removed. Ceoil (talk) 17:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]