Woes of the Pharisees: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:48, 12 January 2007

The Woes of the Pharisees is a list of criticisms by Jesus against Scribes and Pharisees and Lawyers that is present in the Gospel of Luke 11:37–54 and Gospel of Matthew 23:1–36. Seven are listed in Matthew, and hence Matthew's version is known as the seven woes, while only six are given in Luke, whose version is thus known as the six woes. They do not occur in the same point of the narrative, in Matthew they occur shortly before Jesus returns to Jerusalem for his last few days before being crucified, while in Luke they occur shortly after the Lord's prayer is given and the disciples are first sent out over the land. Since they occur in Luke and Matthew but not the Gospel of Mark, and in different positions of the narrative, they are considered likely to derive from the earlier Q document.

The woes mostly criticise the Pharisees for hypocrisy and perjury. Before introducing the woes themselves, Matthew states that Jesus criticised them for taking the place of honour at banquets, for wearing ostentatious clothing, for encouraging people to call them Rabbi. Matthew emphasises this by giving a saying similar in style to those of the Gospel of Thomas:

whoever exalts himself shall be humbled, and whoever humbles himself shall be exalted

The woes themselves are the following criticisms:

Shutting the kingdom of heaven in men's faces
Making converts twice as much a son of hell as the converters themselves are
Claiming that swearing by the temple is nothing, but claiming that swearing by the temple's gold is everything
Obeying the minutiae of the law (such as giving up a tithe) but neglecting the important facets (such as justice, and mercy) - metaphorically straining out a gnat but swallowing a camel
Being shallow - metaphorically cleaning the outside of the cup and dish but leaving the inside full of greed and self-indulgence
Hypocrisy - appearing righteous but actually being full of wickedness, metaphorically like whitewashed tombs, beautiful on the outside, but full of dead men's bones
Claiming that they would have behaved better than their forefathers - even though they build and respect the tombs of those who murdered the prophets.

The last woe seemingly encouraging the concept of blood guilt has often been criticised for its poor morality.

This article about a book related to Christianity is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Unencyclopedic}}
 {{POV-check}}
+{{Gospel Jesus}}
-The '''Woes of the Pharisees''' is a list of criticisms against the [[Pharisees]], that is present in the [[Gospel of Luke]] and [[Gospel of Matthew]]. Seven are listed in Matthew, and hence Matthew's version is known as '''the seven woes''', while only six are given in Luke, whose version is thus known as '''the six woes'''. They do not occur in the same point of the narrative, in Matthew they occur shortly before Jesus returns to Jerusalem for his last few days before being crucified, while in Luke they occur shortly after the [[Lord's prayer]] is given and the disciples are first sent out over thee land. Since they occur in Luke and Matthew but not the [[Gospel of Mark]], and in different positions of the narrative, they are considered likely to derive from the earlier [[Q document]].
+The '''Woes of the Pharisees''' is a list of criticisms by [[Jesus]] against [[Scribes]] and [[Pharisees]] and [[Lawyers]] that is present in the [[Gospel of Luke]] {{bibleverse-nb||Luke|11:37-54}} and [[Gospel of Matthew]] {{bibleverse-nb||Matt|23:1-36}}. Seven are listed in Matthew, and hence Matthew's version is known as '''the seven woes''', while only six are given in Luke, whose version is thus known as '''the six woes'''. They do not occur in the same point of the narrative, in Matthew they occur shortly before Jesus returns to Jerusalem for his last few days before being crucified, while in Luke they occur shortly after the [[Lord's prayer]] is given and the [[Disciple (Christianity)|disciples]] are first sent out over the land. Since they occur in Luke and Matthew but not the [[Gospel of Mark]], and in different positions of the narrative, they are considered likely to derive from the earlier [[Q document]].
-The woes mostly criticise the Pharisees for [[hypocrisy]] and [[perjury]]. Before introducing the woes themselves, Matthew states that Jesus criticised them for taking the place of honour at banquets, for wearing ostentatious clothing, for encouraging people to call them ''Rabbi''. Matthew emphasises this by giving a saying similar in style to those of the [[Gospel of Thomas]]:
+The woes mostly criticise the Pharisees for [[hypocrisy]] and [[perjury]]. Before introducing the woes themselves, Matthew states that Jesus criticised them for taking the place of honour at banquets, for wearing ostentatious clothing, for encouraging people to call them ''[[Rabbi]]''. Matthew emphasises this by giving a saying similar in style to those of the [[Gospel of Thomas]]:
 :''whoever exalts himself shall be humbled, and whoever humbles himself shall be exalted''
 The woes themselves are the following criticisms:
 *Shutting the [[kingdom of heaven]] in men's faces
-*Making converts twice as much a ''son of hell'' as the converters themselves are
+*Making [[proselytes|converts]] twice as much a ''son of hell'' as the converters themselves are
-*Claiming that swearing by the temple is nothing, but claiming that swearing by the temple's gold is everything
+*Claiming that swearing by the [[Herod's Temple|temple]] is nothing, but claiming that swearing by the temple's gold is everything
-*Obeying the minutiae of the law (such as giving up a [[tithe]]) but neglecting the important facets (such as [[justice]], and [[mercy]]) - metaphorically ''straining out a [[gnat]] but swallowing a [[camel]]''
+*Obeying the minutiae of the [[Mosaic Law|law]] (such as giving up a [[tithe]]) but neglecting the important facets (such as [[justice]], and [[mercy]]) - metaphorically ''straining out a [[gnat]] but swallowing a [[camel]]''
 *Being shallow - metaphorically ''cleaning the outside of the cup and dish'' but leaving the inside full of ''greed and self-indulgence''
 *Hypocrisy - appearing righteous but actually being full of wickedness, metaphorically ''like whitewashed tombs, beautiful on the outside, but full of dead men's bones''
-*Claiming that they would have behaved better than their forefathers - even though they build and respect the tombs of those who murdered the ''prophets''.
+*Claiming that they would have behaved better than their forefathers - even though they build and respect the tombs of those who murdered the ''[[Neviim|prophets]]''.
 The last woe seemingly encouraging the concept of [[blood guilt]] has often been criticised for its poor morality.