Jump to content

Talk:1997 Cambodian coup d'état: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington moved page Talk:1997 Cambodian coup d'état to Talk:1997 armed clashes in Cambodia: rv move made without building consensus on talk page
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
}}
}}
{{reqmapin|Cambodia}}
{{reqmapin|Cambodia}}

==Requested move 1 February 2021
== Requested move 1 February 2021 ==

{{requested move/dated|1997 Cambodian coup d'état}}

[[:1997 armed clashes in Cambodia]] → {{no redirect|1997 Cambodian coup d'état}} – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. [[User:Arcahaeoindris|Arcahaeoindris]] ([[User talk:Arcahaeoindris|talk]]) 20:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Following from this page's move and then reversion of the move as there wasn't a discussion, let's discuss. These events were characterised as a coup by several reliable sources.

* https://www.economist.com/asia/1997/07/10/a-coup-in-cambodia
* https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/remembering-the-cambodian-coup/
* https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1997/07/08/coup-ousts-cambodian-prince/79b825e2-cc2e-425f-be12-a5d57c3d7fc2/
* https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/01/12/30-years-hun-sen/violence-repression-and-corruption-cambodia
* https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13006828
* https://www.un.org/press/en/1997/19970709.cambodia.html
* https://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/17/travel/cambodian-coup-leaves-tourist-sites-empty.html

I could go on. Only within the government is this really characterised as just "clashes". I feel like there's really little debate that this Wikipedia article should characterise this as a coup. --[[User:Arcahaeoindris|Arcahaeoindris]] ([[User talk:Arcahaeoindris|talk]]) 20:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:19, 1 February 2021

==Requested move 1 February 2021

Requested move 1 February 2021

1997 armed clashes in Cambodia1997 Cambodian coup d'état – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 20:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Following from this page's move and then reversion of the move as there wasn't a discussion, let's discuss. These events were characterised as a coup by several reliable sources.

I could go on. Only within the government is this really characterised as just "clashes". I feel like there's really little debate that this Wikipedia article should characterise this as a coup. --Arcahaeoindris (talk) 20:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]