Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeepFuckingValue: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
new comments go at the bottom
Line 1: Line 1:
Why would you delete this article about a main figure in one of the biggest stock-news since 2008. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.191.66.150|85.191.66.150]] ([[User talk:85.191.66.150#top|talk]]) 13:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

===[[:DeepFuckingValue]]===
===[[:DeepFuckingValue]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
Line 54: Line 52:
*'''Delete'''' or ''''Merge''' to [[GameStop short squeeze]]. A lot of people have very shallow understanding of notability rules. [[WP:RECENTISM]] and [[WP:NOTNEWS]] apply here. Just because something grabs headlines doesn't mean it gets an article. However a lot of people, those who vote, often just see something as having sources and then say that's enough without considering other policies. And a lot of what people consider "notable" ends up being totally subjective. [[WP:TOOSOON]] applies here too because we have no idea how this will play out or if this guy will get more notability later on. [[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 15:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''' or ''''Merge''' to [[GameStop short squeeze]]. A lot of people have very shallow understanding of notability rules. [[WP:RECENTISM]] and [[WP:NOTNEWS]] apply here. Just because something grabs headlines doesn't mean it gets an article. However a lot of people, those who vote, often just see something as having sources and then say that's enough without considering other policies. And a lot of what people consider "notable" ends up being totally subjective. [[WP:TOOSOON]] applies here too because we have no idea how this will play out or if this guy will get more notability later on. [[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 15:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep or redirect to Keith Patrick Gill''' - It's clear that DeepFuckingValue is tied to [[GameStop short squeeze|a notable topic]], and there seems to be enough content here to warrant him having his own article versus a section on the short squeeze page. The upcoming congressional testimony, although not currently mentioned in the article, adds another point for his notability. <span style="color:#4CBB17">--Posted by</span> [[User:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">Pikamander2</span>]] <small>[[User Talk:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">(Talk)</span>]]</small> at 17:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep or redirect to Keith Patrick Gill''' - It's clear that DeepFuckingValue is tied to [[GameStop short squeeze|a notable topic]], and there seems to be enough content here to warrant him having his own article versus a section on the short squeeze page. The upcoming congressional testimony, although not currently mentioned in the article, adds another point for his notability. <span style="color:#4CBB17">--Posted by</span> [[User:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">Pikamander2</span>]] <small>[[User Talk:Pikamander2|<span style="color:#007FFF">(Talk)</span>]]</small> at 17:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Why would you delete this article about a main figure in one of the biggest stock-news since 2008. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.191.66.150|85.191.66.150]] ([[User talk:85.191.66.150#top|talk]]) 13:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 18:03, 4 February 2021

DeepFuckingValue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is a living person known primarily for a single event, the GameStop short squeeze. WP:BLP1E applies. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - WP:BLP1E does not apply since points 2 and 3 are not met. Their role in the event is very well-documented, and they are not likely to remain low-profile otherwise. Per WP:LOWPROFILE, "A low-profile individual is someone who has been covered in reliable sources without seeking such attention, often as part of their connection with a single event. Persons who actively seek out media attention are not low-profile, regardless of whether or not they are notable." DeepFuckingValue sought out interviews with media, making them fail this criteria and BLP1E. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 19:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There's enough info here that it makes sense to split it off from the main article. It could be merged, but that wouldn't be ideal. It's more than just a passing mention. Benjamin (talk) 19:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - #3 "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented." Event is significant and the individual's role is substantial and well-documented. UserTwoSix (talk) 19:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: per Elliot, seems to satisfy WP:BLP and WP:GNG as this person has seen much media coverage. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Reuters doxxed someone, and then everyone else wrote about the doxxing. 64.246.153.97 (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you delete this article about a main figure in one of the biggest stock-news since 2008. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.191.66.150 (talk) 13:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]