Artin's conjecture on primitive roots: Difference between revisions
→References: cat. |
→Partial results: typo |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
In 1967, [[Christopher Hooley]] published a [[conditional proof]] for the conjecture, assuming certain cases of the [[generalized Riemann hypothesis]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hooley|first1=Christopher |year=1967 |title=On Artin's conjecture |journal=J. Reine Angew. Math. |volume=225 |pages=209–220|mr=0207630|doi=10.1515/crll.1967.225.209}}</ref> |
In 1967, [[Christopher Hooley]] published a [[conditional proof]] for the conjecture, assuming certain cases of the [[generalized Riemann hypothesis]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hooley|first1=Christopher |year=1967 |title=On Artin's conjecture |journal=J. Reine Angew. Math. |volume=225 |pages=209–220|mr=0207630|doi=10.1515/crll.1967.225.209}}</ref> |
||
Without the generalized Riemann hypothesis, there is no single value of ''a'' for which Artin's conjecture is proved. [[Roger Heath-Brown|D. R. Heath-Brown]] proved (Corollary 1) that at least one of 2, 3, or 5 is a primitive root modulo infinitely many primes ''p''.<ref>{{ cite journal |author=D. R. Heath-Brown |title=Artin's Conjecture for Primitive Roots |journal=The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics |volume=37 |issue=1 |date=March 1986 |pages=27–38 |doi=10.1093/qmath/37.1.27}}</ref>He also proved (Corollary 2) that there are at most two primes for which Artin's conjecture fails. |
Without the generalized Riemann hypothesis, there is no single value of ''a'' for which Artin's conjecture is proved. [[Roger Heath-Brown|D. R. Heath-Brown]] proved (Corollary 1) that at least one of 2, 3, or 5 is a primitive root modulo infinitely many primes ''p''.<ref>{{ cite journal |author=D. R. Heath-Brown |title=Artin's Conjecture for Primitive Roots |journal=The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics |volume=37 |issue=1 |date=March 1986 |pages=27–38 |doi=10.1093/qmath/37.1.27}}</ref> He also proved (Corollary 2) that there are at most two primes for which Artin's conjecture fails. |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
Revision as of 10:36, 5 February 2021
In number theory, Artin's conjecture on primitive roots states that a given integer a that is neither a perfect square nor −1 is a primitive root modulo infinitely many primes p. The conjecture also ascribes an asymptotic density to these primes. This conjectural density equals Artin's constant or a rational multiple thereof.
The conjecture was made by Emil Artin to Helmut Hasse on September 27, 1927, according to the latter's diary. The conjecture is still unresolved as of 2020. In fact, there is no single value of a for which Artin's conjecture is proved.
Formulation
Let a be an integer that is not a perfect square and not −1. Write a = a0b2 with a0 square-free. Denote by S(a) the set of prime numbers p such that a is a primitive root modulo p. Then the conjecture states
- S(a) has a positive asymptotic density inside the set of primes. In particular, S(a) is infinite.
- Under the conditions that a is not a perfect power and that a0 is not congruent to 1 modulo 4 (sequence A085397 in the OEIS), this density is independent of a and equals Artin's constant, which can be expressed as an infinite product
- Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "http://localhost:6011/en.wikipedia.org/v1/":): {\displaystyle C_{\mathrm{Artin}}=\prod_{p\ \mathrm{prime}} \left(1-\frac{1}{p(p-1)}\right) = 0.3739558136\ldots} (sequence A005596 in the OEIS).
Similar conjectural product formulas [1] exist for the density when a does not satisfy the above conditions. In these cases, the conjectural density is always a rational multiple of CArtin.
Example
For example, take a = 2. The conjecture claims that the set of primes p for which 2 is a primitive root has the above density CArtin. The set of such primes is (sequence A001122 in the OEIS)
- S(2) = {3, 5, 11, 13, 19, 29, 37, 53, 59, 61, 67, 83, 101, 107, 131, 139, 149, 163, 173, 179, 181, 197, 211, 227, 269, 293, 317, 347, 349, 373, 379, 389, 419, 421, 443, 461, 467, 491, ...}.
It has 38 elements smaller than 500 and there are 95 primes smaller than 500. The ratio (which conjecturally tends to CArtin) is 38/95 = 2/5 = 0.4.
Partial results
In 1967, Christopher Hooley published a conditional proof for the conjecture, assuming certain cases of the generalized Riemann hypothesis.[2]
Without the generalized Riemann hypothesis, there is no single value of a for which Artin's conjecture is proved. D. R. Heath-Brown proved (Corollary 1) that at least one of 2, 3, or 5 is a primitive root modulo infinitely many primes p.[3] He also proved (Corollary 2) that there are at most two primes for which Artin's conjecture fails.
See also
- Stephens' constant, a number that plays the same role in a generalization of Artin's conjecture as Artin's constant plays here
- Brown–Zassenhaus conjecture
- Full reptend prime
- Cyclic number (group theory)
References
- ^ Michon, Gerard P. (2006-06-15). "Artin's Constant". Numericana.
- ^ Hooley, Christopher (1967). "On Artin's conjecture". J. Reine Angew. Math. 225: 209–220. doi:10.1515/crll.1967.225.209. MR 0207630.
- ^ D. R. Heath-Brown (March 1986). "Artin's Conjecture for Primitive Roots". The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics. 37 (1): 27–38. doi:10.1093/qmath/37.1.27.