Jump to content

Talk:Louise Woodward case: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 31: Line 31:


==[[Raviv Zoller]]==
==[[Raviv Zoller]]==
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Raviv_Zoller. Paid]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Raviv_Zoller Paid]

Revision as of 16:51, 7 February 2021

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louise Woodward case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional source

Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.

Add (currently missing) citation to the following sentence to the second paragraph in the 'Aftermath' section of the article: "Matthew's parents filed a civil lawsuit to prevent Woodward from earning any profits from selling her story."[1]

Cf2022 (talk) 04:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Cf2022[reply]

  • I see this on p25 of the source. But there's only mention of a preliminary injunction. I'm not sure this is worth including unless we can tell the reader the final disposition of the action. Any sources on that? EEng 05:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid

  1. ^ Kealy, Sean (2000). "A Proposal for a New Massachusetts Notoriety for Profit Law: The Grandson of Sam". 22. Western New England Law Review.