Jump to content

Wind power in the United States: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Economics: Got the wording right for the koch funded study. The previous version made it sound like Utah State University was wholly funded by Koch, but failed to specify the study was what was funded.
Line 82: Line 82:


==Economics==
==Economics==
A 2012 report by a clean energy consulting group concluded that new wind farms can produce electric power in the 5-8 cents per kWh range, making wind power cost-competitive with fossil fuels in many areas.<ref name="Ron Pernick 2012 5">{{cite web |url=http://www.cleanedge.com/sites/default/files/CETrends2012_Final_Web.pdf?attachment=true |title=Clean Energy Trends 2012|author=Ron Pernick |year=2012 |publisher=Clean Edge |page=5 |author-link=Ron Pernick}}</ref> As of 2013, the US Energy Information Administration estimates the "levelized cost" of wind energy from new installations as 7 to 10 cents per kWh, depending on the geographic area, but cautioned that levelized costs of non-[[Dispatchable generation|dispatchable]] sources such as wind should be compared to the avoided energy cost rather than the levelized cost of dispatchable sources such as natural gas, or baseload sources such as coal or geothermal.<ref>US Energy Information Administration, [http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/electricity_generation.cfm Levelized cost of new generation resources], 28 January 2013.</ref>{{Page needed|date=April 2016}} In 2015, [[Utah State University]] - a [[Koch Industries|Koch]]-funded institute<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article13227437.html |title=Kansas Senate chairman cuts off questions about Koch funding at energy hearing|work=[[The Wichita Eagle]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/03/27/14497/inside-koch-brothers-campus-crusade |title=Inside the Koch brothers' campus crusade|author=Dave Levinthal|work=[[Center for Public Integrity]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url= http://www.newsweek.com/true-benefits-wind-power-323595 |title=The True Benefits of Wind Power|date=2015-04-21|newspaper=Newsweek |access-date=2017-02-16|language=en}}</ref>- published a study stating that the cost of wind energy is higher than most cost estimates calculate. The [[American Wind Energy Association]] has criticized the study of lacking comparison with pollution and subsidies incurred by other electric power sources, and for counting transmission as a cost rather than a benefit.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aweablog.org/koch-funded-study-on-cost-of-wind-flawed-throughout/ |title=Koch-funded study on cost of wind flawed throughout|author=Shauna Theel|publisher=[[American Wind Energy Association]] |date=7 July 2015|access-date=27 April 2016}}</ref>
A 2012 report by a clean energy consulting group concluded that new wind farms can produce electric power in the 5-8 cents per kWh range, making wind power cost-competitive with fossil fuels in many areas.<ref name="Ron Pernick 2012 5">{{cite web |url=http://www.cleanedge.com/sites/default/files/CETrends2012_Final_Web.pdf?attachment=true |title=Clean Energy Trends 2012|author=Ron Pernick |year=2012 |publisher=Clean Edge |page=5 |author-link=Ron Pernick}}</ref> As of 2013, the US Energy Information Administration estimates the "levelized cost" of wind energy from new installations as 7 to 10 cents per kWh, depending on the geographic area, but cautioned that levelized costs of non-[[Dispatchable generation|dispatchable]] sources such as wind should be compared to the avoided energy cost rather than the levelized cost of dispatchable sources such as natural gas, or baseload sources such as coal or geothermal.<ref>US Energy Information Administration, [http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/electricity_generation.cfm Levelized cost of new generation resources], 28 January 2013.</ref>{{Page needed|date=April 2016}} In 2015, [[Utah State University]] published a [[Koch Industries|Koch]]-funded study<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article13227437.html |title=Kansas Senate chairman cuts off questions about Koch funding at energy hearing|work=[[The Wichita Eagle]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/03/27/14497/inside-koch-brothers-campus-crusade |title=Inside the Koch brothers' campus crusade|author=Dave Levinthal|work=[[Center for Public Integrity]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url= http://www.newsweek.com/true-benefits-wind-power-323595 |title=The True Benefits of Wind Power|date=2015-04-21|newspaper=Newsweek |access-date=2017-02-16|language=en}}</ref> stating that the cost of wind energy is higher than most cost estimates calculate. The [[American Wind Energy Association]] has criticized the study of lacking comparison with pollution and subsidies incurred by other electric power sources, and for counting transmission as a cost rather than a benefit.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aweablog.org/koch-funded-study-on-cost-of-wind-flawed-throughout/ |title=Koch-funded study on cost of wind flawed throughout|author=Shauna Theel|publisher=[[American Wind Energy Association]] |date=7 July 2015|access-date=27 April 2016}}</ref>



Revision as of 00:59, 11 February 2021

Brazos Wind Farm in Texas.
Mendota Hills Wind Farm in northern Illinois
Wind farm in Southeastern Washington

Wind power in the United States is a branch of the energy industry that has expanded quickly over the latest several years.[1] From January through December 2019, 300.1 terawatt-hours were generated by wind power, or 7.29% of all generated electrical energy in the United States.[2] That same year, wind power surpassed hydroelectric power as the largest renewable energy source generated in the U.S.

As of January 2020, the total installed wind power nameplate generating capacity in the United States was 105,583 megawatts (MW).[3] This capacity is exceeded only by China and the European Union.[4] Thus far, wind power's largest growth in capacity was in 2012, when 11,895 MW of wind power was installed, representing 26.5% of new power capacity.[1]

By September 2019, 19 states had over 1,000 MW of installed capacity with 5 states (Texas, Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas, and California) generating over half of all wind energy in the nation.[5] Texas, with 28,843 MW of capacity, about 16.8% of the state's electricity usage, had the most installed wind power capacity of any U.S. state at the end of 2019.[6] Texas also had more under construction than any other state currently has installed.[7] The state generating the highest percentage of energy from wind power is Iowa at 42% of total energy production,[5] while North Dakota has the most per capita wind generation.

The Alta Wind Energy Center in California is the largest wind farm in the United States with a capacity of 1,548 MW.[8] GE Power is the largest domestic wind turbine manufacturer.[9]

History

Map showing average wind speed in U.S., including offshore
Map illustrating installed wind generating capacity for U.S. states at end of 2018. Compare with wind speed map.

The first municipal use of multiple wind-electric turbines in the USA may have been a five turbine system in Pettibone, North Dakota in 1940. These were commercial Wincharger units on guyed towers.[10]

In 1980 the world's first wind farm, consisting of twenty 30 kW wind turbines was installed at Crotched Mountain, in New Hampshire.[11]

From 1974 through the mid-1980s the United States government worked with industry to advance the technology and enable large commercial wind turbines. A series of NASA wind turbines were developed under a program to create a utility-scale wind turbine industry in the U.S., with funding from the National Science Foundation and later the United States Department of Energy (DOE). A total of 13 experimental wind turbines were put into operation, in four major wind turbine designs. This research and development program pioneered many of the multi-megawatt turbine technologies in use today, including: steel tube towers, variable-speed generators, composite blade materials, partial-span pitch control, as well as aerodynamic, structural, and acoustic engineering design capabilities.

Later, in the 1980s, California provided tax rebates for wind power. These rebates funded the first major use of wind power for utility electric power. These machines, gathered in large wind parks such as at Altamont Pass would be considered small and un-economic by modern wind power development standards. In 1985 half of the world's wind energy was generated at Altamont Pass. By the end of 1986 about 6,700 wind turbines, mostly less than 100 kW, had been installed at Altamont, at a cost of about $1 billion, and generated about 550 GWh/year.[12]

Largest wind farms

2018 US wind farms

Ten of the largest wind farms in the United States are:

Project Capacity (MW) State
Alta Wind Energy Center 1548[8] California
Los Vientos Wind Farm 912[13] Texas
Shepherds Flat Wind Farm 845[14] Oregon
Meadow Lake Wind Farm 801[15] Indiana
Roscoe Wind Farm 781[16] Texas
Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center 736 Texas
Tehachapi Pass Wind Farm 705 California
Capricorn Ridge Wind Farm 662 Texas
San Gorgonio Pass Wind Farm 619 California
Limon Wind Energy Center 601[17] Colorado

Economics

A 2012 report by a clean energy consulting group concluded that new wind farms can produce electric power in the 5-8 cents per kWh range, making wind power cost-competitive with fossil fuels in many areas.[18] As of 2013, the US Energy Information Administration estimates the "levelized cost" of wind energy from new installations as 7 to 10 cents per kWh, depending on the geographic area, but cautioned that levelized costs of non-dispatchable sources such as wind should be compared to the avoided energy cost rather than the levelized cost of dispatchable sources such as natural gas, or baseload sources such as coal or geothermal.[19][page needed] In 2015, Utah State University published a Koch-funded study[20][21][22] stating that the cost of wind energy is higher than most cost estimates calculate. The American Wind Energy Association has criticized the study of lacking comparison with pollution and subsidies incurred by other electric power sources, and for counting transmission as a cost rather than a benefit.[23]


Renewable portfolio standards require renewable energy to exist (most of them intermittent such as wind and solar), but at the expense of utilities and consumers. Subsidizing this with production tax credits makes wind power cheaper for utilities and consumers, but at the expense of taxpayers.[24]

Production

Monthly wind electric power generation in the US, 2007–2017
Average monthly capacity factors for electric power generation by utility-scale wind turbines in the United States, 2011–2015 (US Energy Information Administration data)
Wind generation by year in the United States Wind generation capacity by year in the United States
Power from wind generated annually
since 2000 (GWh)[25][26][27]
Installed wind power generating capacity
since 1999 (MW)[28][29][30][7][31][32]

As of 2019, the United States has over 105 GW of installed wind power capacity. Wind power has increased dramatically over the past years. In 2010, however, newly installed generating capacity was about half of the previous year due to various factors, including the financial crisis, and recession. In 2013 there was a 92% reduction in newly installed generating capacity compared to 2012, due to the late extension of the PTC (see image on the right).[33] The graph at left shows the growth in installed wind generation capacity in the United States based on data from the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.[29] In 2008, installed capacity in the U.S. increased by 50% over the prior year. The world average growth rate that year was 28.8%.[34]

By 2014, the wind industry in the USA was able to produce more power at lower cost by using taller wind turbines with longer blades, capturing the faster winds at higher elevations. This opened up new opportunities and in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio, the price of power from wind turbines 300 to 400 feet (90 to 120 m) above the ground competed with conventional fossil fuels like coal. Prices had fallen to about 4 cents per kilowatt-hour in some cases and utilities had been increasing the amount of wind energy in their portfolio, saying it is their cheapest option.[35] For power contracts made in the year 2014, the average price of wind power fell to 2.5¢/kWh.[36]

The capacity factor is the ratio of power actually produced divided by the nameplate capacity of the turbines. The overall average capacity factor for wind generation in the US increased from 31.7% in 2008, to 32.3% in 2013.[37]

Wind generation potential

According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the contiguous United States has the potential for 10,459 GW of onshore wind power.[38][39] The capacity could generate 37 petawatt-hours (PW·h) annually, an amount nine times larger than current total U.S. electricity consumption.[40] The U.S. also has large wind resources in Alaska,[41] and Hawaii.[42]

In addition to the large onshore wind resources, the U.S. has large offshore wind power potential,[43] with another NREL report released in September 2010 showing that the U.S. has 4,150 GW of potential offshore wind power nameplate capacity, an amount 4 times that of the country's 2008 installed capacity from all sources, of 1,010 GW.[44] Some experts estimate that the entire East Coast could be powered by offshore wind farms.[45]

The U.S. Department of Energy's 2008 report 20% Wind Energy by 2030[46] envisioned that wind power could supply 20% of all U.S. electric power, which included a contribution of 4% to the nation's total electric power from offshore wind power.[47] In order to achieve this, however, significant advances in cost, performance and reliability are needed, based on a 2011 report from a coalition of researchers from universities, industry, and government, supported by the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future.[48] Obtaining 20% from wind requires about 305 GW of wind turbines, an increase of 16 GW/year after 2018, or an average increase of 14.6%/year, and transmission line improvements.[46] Analysts estimate around 25 GW of added US wind power in 2016–18,[49] depending on the Clean Power Plan and PTC extensions. After the current PTC phase-out in 2021, additional wind power capacity is expected to be around 5 GW per year.[50]

Wind power by state

Trends of wind electrical generation in the top five states, 1990-2013 (US EIA data)
Wind electricity generation in the United States, 2001–2018. In 2018, 4 states made up over half of total wind power output

In 2019, electric power generation from wind power was 10 percent or more in fourteen U.S. states: Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Vermont, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Texas.[51] Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Kansas each had more than 20 percent of their electric power generation come from wind.[52] Twenty states now have more than five percent of their generation coming from wind.[52] Iowa become the first state in the nation to generate 40% of its electricity from wind power in late 2019, as predicted in 2015.[53]

The five states with the most wind capacity installed at the end of 2019 were:[3]

The top five states according to percentage of generation by wind in 2019 were:[54]

Texas

A wind turbine blade on I-35 near Elm Mott, an increasingly common sight in Texas

In 2016 Texas surpassed the 20,000 MW mark by adding over 1800 MW of generating capacity.[7] In 2011, Texas had become the first state to surpass the 10,000 MW mark.[55]

In July 2008, Texas approved a $4.93 billion expansion of the state's electric grid to bring wind energy to its major cities from western areas of the state. Transmission companies will recoup the cost of constructing the new power lines, expected to be completed in 2013, from fees estimated at $4 per month for residential customers.[56] A lack of transmission capacity forced wind turbines to be shut down at times and reduced wind power generation in Texas by 17% in 2009.[57]

On completion in 2016, the Los Vientos Wind Farm became Texas's most powerful wind farm with a total installed capacity of 912 MW.[13] It is spread out over two counties in South Texas. It is followed by the Roscoe Wind Farm with 627 wind turbines and a total installed capacity of 781.5 MW which is located about 200 miles (320 km) west of Fort Worth in an area that spans parts of four Texas counties.[58][59] The Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center is third with 735.5 MW.[60]

Large wind farms in Texas[61][62]
Wind farm Installed
capacity (MW)
Turbine
manufacturer
County
Buffalo Gap Wind Farm 523 Vestas Taylor / Nolan
Capricorn Ridge Wind Farm 662 GE Energy / Siemens Sterling / Coke
Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center 735 GE Energy / Siemens Taylor / Nolan
Lone Star Wind Farm 400 Gamesa Shackelford / Callahan
Los Vientos Wind Farm 912[13] Mitsubishi / Siemens / Vestas Starr / Willacy
Panther Creek Wind Farm 458 GE Energy Howard / ...
Papalote Creek Wind Farm 380[63] Siemens San Patricio
Peñascal Wind Farm 404 Mitsubishi Kenedy
Roscoe Wind Farm 781[64] Mitsubishi Nolan
Sweetwater Wind Farm 585 GE Energy / Siemens / Mitsubishi Nolan

Iowa

State wind generation percentages for 2017. Five states exceeded 25% of generation.

More than 42 percent of the electric power generated in Iowa now comes from wind power as of April 2020.[65] Iowa had over 10,200 megawatts (MW) of generation capacity at the end of 2019, with over 1,500 megawatts planned to come online in the near future.[65] Electrical energy generated in Iowa by wind in 2019 amounted to over 21 million Megawatt-hours.[65] Since Iowa adopted a renewable energy standard in 1983, the wind power industry has generated over $19 billion in investment.[65] The second concrete wind turbine tower to be built in the U.S., and also the country's tallest (377 feet) at the time built, is in Adams county. The tower was completed in the spring of 2016.[66]

In 2018, Invenergy announced it plans to develop a pair of wind farms in Iowa. Each farm will be capable of generating 200 MW. Construction is planned to begin in early 2019.[67]

Oklahoma

Oklahoma has one of the best resources in the United States. Bergey Windpower, a leading manufacturer of small wind turbines is located in Oklahoma. Programs leading to careers in the wind power industry are provided at tech schools, community colleges and universities in Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Wind Power Initiative supports the development of wind power in the state.[68]

Kansas

In 2012, Kansas saw a large number of wind projects completed making it among the largest and fastest-growing wind energy markets.[citation needed] At the end of 2014 the total capacity sits at 2,967 MW.[1][69] Kansas has high potential capacity for wind power, second behind Texas. The most recent estimates are that Kansas has a potential for 950 GW of wind power capacity. Kansas could generate 3,900 TW·h of electric power each year, which represents more than all the electric power generated from coal, natural gas and nuclear combined in the United States in 2011.[70]

California

Wind power in California has doubled[when?] in capacity since 2002. With a total of nearly 4,000 megawatts installed, as of the end of 2011, wind energy supplied about 5% of California's total electric power needs, or enough to power more than 400,000 households. The amount varies greatly from day to day.[71] In 2011, 921.3 megawatts were installed. Most of that activity occurred in the Tehachapi area of Kern County, with some big projects in Solano, Contra Costa and Riverside counties as well.[citation needed] After 2014, California ranked second nationwide in terms of capacity, behind Texas with a capacity of 5,917 MW.[1]

Large portions of California's wind output, are located in three primary regions: Altamont Pass Wind Farm (east of San Francisco); Tehachapi Pass Wind Farm (south east of Bakersfield), and San Gorgonio Pass Wind Farm (near Palm Springs, east of Los Angeles). The giant new Alta Wind Energy Center, is also located within the Tehachapi Pass region.[72]

Large wind farms in California
Name Location Capacity
(MW)
Ref
Altamont Pass Wind Farm Alameda County 576 [73]
Alta Wind Energy Center Kern County 1548 [8]
San Gorgonio Pass Wind Farm Riverside County 615 [73]
Tehachapi Pass Wind Farm Kern County 705 [73]
The majority of the San Gorgonio Pass Wind Farm as viewed from the San Jacinto Mountains to the south. (The farm continues over the hills to the north along California State Route 62 and is not visible from this vantagepoint). The layout includes a variety of large modern and older smaller turbine designs

Illinois

The average monthly per person wind generation for the top 20 U.S. states is shown. For reference, the average monthly residential electricity use in the U.S. is about 900 kW-hours.

Wind power has been supported by a renewable portfolio standard,[74] passed in 2007, and strengthened in 2009, which requires 10% renewable energy from electric companies by 2010 and 25% by 2025. Illinois has the potential for installing up to an estimated 249,882 MW of wind generation capacity at a hub height of 80 meters.[75]

Commercialization of wind power

Levelized wind Power purchase agreement prices by PPA execution date and region
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory projects that the levelized cost of wind power in the U.S. will decline about 25% from 2012 to 2030.[76]

Since 2005 many turbine manufacturing leaders have opened U.S. facilities; of the top 10 global manufacturers in 2007, seven – Vestas, GE Energy, Gamesa, Suzlon, Siemens, Acciona, and Nordex – have an American manufacturing presence.[77][78][36] REpower is another manufacturer with notable usage in the United States.[79]

Plans for 30 new manufacturing facilities were announced in 2008, and the wind industry expects to see a continued shift towards domestic manufacturing in the coming years. In total, 70 manufacturing facilities have begun production, been expanded, or announced since January 2007.[77]

As of April 2009, over 100 companies are producing components for wind turbines, employing thousands of workers in the manufacture of parts as varied as towers, composite blades, bearings and gears. Many existing companies in traditional manufacturing states have retooled to enter the wind industry. Their manufacturing facilities are spread across 40 states, employing workers from the Southeast to the Steel Belt, to the Great Plains and on to the Pacific Northwest.[77]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is working with six leading wind turbine manufacturers towards achieving 20% wind power in the United States by 2030. The DOE announced the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with GE Energy, Siemens Power Generation, Vestas Wind Systems, Clipper Windpower, Suzlon Energy, and Gamesa Corporation. Under the MOU, the DOE and the six manufacturers will collaborate to gather and exchange information relating to five major areas: research and development related to turbine reliability and operability; siting strategies for wind power facilities; standards development for turbine certification and universal interconnection of wind turbines; manufacturing advances in design, process automation, and fabrication techniques; and workforce development.[46][80]

In 2014, GE had 60%, Siemens had 26%, and Vestas had 12% of US market share. Combined, they had 98%.[81] Most new turbines were designed for low wind. The turbine manufacturers compete with each other and cause decreasing turbine prices.[36]

Other government involvement

Kaheawa Wind Farm near Maalaea, Maui, with 20 GE Energy 1.5 MW wind turbines

The DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has announced a number of wind technology projects, including a new state-of-the-art wind turbine blade test facility to be built in Ingleside, Texas. The Texas-NREL Large Blade Research and Test Facility will be capable of testing blades as long as 70 meters (230 feet). It will be built and operated through a partnership among NREL, DOE, and a state consortium led by University of Houston, with the university owning and operating the facility's buildings, DOE funding up to $2 million in capital costs, and NREL providing technical and operational assistance. The blade test facility is estimated to cost between $12 million and $15 million and should be completed by 2010. Located on the Gulf Coast, the Texas facility will complement a similar facility that is being built on the coast of Massachusetts.[82]

NREL has also recently signed agreements with Siemens Power Generation and First Wind, a wind power developer. Siemens is launching a new research and development facility in nearby Boulder, Colorado, and has agreed to locate and test a commercial-scale wind turbine at NREL's National Wind Technology Center (NWTC). First Wind (formerly called UPC Wind Partners, LLC) owns and operates the 30-megawatt Kaheawa Wind Power farm in West Maui, Hawaii, and has agreed to let the NWTC establish a Remote Research Affiliate Partner Site at the facility. The Maui satellite of NWTC will collaborate with First Wind on studies to develop advanced wind energy technologies, including energy storage and integration of renewable electric power into Maui's electrical grid.[83]

In 2010, the DOE awarded $60 million for a study of transmission requirements.[84] Beginning in 2006, the DOE is required to provide a transmission congestion report once every three years.[85]

Recent U.S. policy has generally been to provide an inflation-adjusted federal production tax credit (PTC) of $15 per MW·h (in 1995 dollars) generated for the first ten years of operation for wind energy sold. As of 2015, the credit was $23 per MW·h.[86] Renewable portfolio standards mandating a certain percentage of electric power sales come from renewable energy sources, which are in place in about half of the states, also have boosted the development of the wind industry.[87]

Each time Congress has allowed the production tax credit to expire, wind power development has slowed as investors wait for the credit to be restored. Each year it is renewed, development has expanded. The tax credit expired at the end of 2012, bringing wind power development activity to a near halt. A short term, one-year policy was enacted at the beginning of 2013 which provides a tax credit to projects under construction by the end of 2013 and completed before the end of 2014.[88] The PTC was first introduced in 1992.[89] When it was allowed to expire, development dropped 93%, 73%, and 77% the following year.

The Energy Information Administration has reported that wind power received the largest share of direct federal subsidies and support in fiscal year 2013 (the latest year for which statistics are available), accounting for 37% ($5.936 billion) of total electric power-related subsidies. Almost three-quarters of wind energy subsidies in that year were direct expenditures and largely resulted from the ARRA programs. These figures do not include subsidies and supports from other levels of government.[90]

The development of wind power in the United States has been supported primarily through a production tax credit (PTC), which pays producers on the amount of electric power produced. On January 1, 2013 the production tax credit was extended for another year.[88]

In late 2015 authorities provided an extension of the Production Tax Credit. The extension phases out the credit over a period of five years. The 30 percent wind and solar tax credit will extend through 2019 and then taper to 10 percent in 2022.[91]

The average price of Power purchase agreements was $23.5/MWh in 2014.[81] Operating expenses were estimated to $10/MWh.[36]

Siting considerations

Landowners typically receive $3,000 to $5,000 per year in rental income from each wind turbine, while farmers continue to grow crops or graze cattle up to the foot of the turbines.[9]

There is competition for wind farms among farmers in places like Iowa or ranchers in Colorado. Farmers, with no investment on their part, typically receive $3,000–5,000 per year in royalties[92] from the local utility for siting a single, large, advanced-design wind turbine.[93][94][95][96][97]

Landscape and ecological issues may be significant for some wind farm proposals,[98] and environmental issues are a consideration in site selection.[99]

Worldwide experience has shown that community consultation and direct involvement of the general public in wind farm projects has helped to increase community approval, and some wind farms overseas have become tourist attractions, like the Ten Mile Lagoon wind farm.

Offshore wind power

Offshore wind power potential in the United States

Offshore development is hindered by relatively high cost compared to onshore facilities. Several projects are under development with some at advanced stages of development.[100] The United States, though, has very large offshore wind energy resources due to strong, consistent winds off the long U.S. coastline.[47]

The 2011 NREL report, Large-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States, analyzes the current state of the offshore wind energy industry. According to the report, offshore wind resource development would help the country to achieve 20% of its electric power from wind by 2030 and to revitalize the manufacturing sector. Offshore wind could supply 54 gigawatts of capacity to the nation's electrical grid, thereby increasing energy security. It could also generate an estimated $200 billion in new economic activity and create thousands of permanent jobs.[101] NREL's report concludes that "the development of the nation’s offshore wind resources can provide many potential benefits, and that offshore wind energy could play a vital role in future U.S. energy markets".[101]

Coastal residents have opposed offshore wind farms because of fears about impacts on marine life, the environment, electric power rates, aesthetics, and recreation such as fishing and boating. However, residents also cite improved electric power rates, air quality, and job creation as positive impacts they would expect from wind farms.[102][103] Because the bases of offshore turbines function as artificial reefs, studies have shown that after the initial disturbance of construction, local fish and shellfish are positively affected.[102][104] Because wind turbines can be positioned at some distance from shore, impacts to recreation and fishing can be managed by careful planning of wind farm locations.[102]

Five exploratory leases for wind power production on the Outer Continental Shelf offshore from New Jersey and Delaware were issued in June 2009 by the Secretary of the Interior. The leases authorize data gathering activities, allowing for the construction of meteorological towers on the Outer Continental Shelf from six to 18 miles (29 km) offshore.[105] Four areas are being considered.[106] On February 7, 2011, Salazar and Steven Chu announced a national strategy to have offshore wind power of 10 GW in 2020, and 54 GW in 2030.[107]

Projects are under development in areas of the East Coast, Great Lakes, and Gulf coast.[100]

New England

Massachusetts and Rhode Island have strong offshore wind resources.

Rhode Island and Massachusetts state officials picked Deepwater Wind to build a $1.5-billion, 385-megawatt wind farm in federal waters off Block Island. The 100-turbine project could provide 1.3 terawatt-hours (TW·h) of electric power per year – 15 percent of all electric power used in the state of Rhode Island.[108][109][110] In 2009, Deepwater signed an agreement with National Grid to sell the power from a smaller $200-million, 30-MW wind farm off Block Island, at an initial price of 24.4 ¢/kW·h.[111] Construction of the Block Island Wind Farm, a five turbine project began in April 2015 and was completed in December 2016 to become the first offshore wind farm in the United States.

Cape Wind started development around 2002, but faced opposition and eventually ceased before being realized. The floating VolturnUS operated in Penobscot Bay near Castine from June 2013 to November 2014.[112][113] Maine Aqua Ventus intends to have two floating 6 MW turbines in operation off the coast of Monhegan Island by the end of 2020. Each turbine will be supported on a VolturnUS floating concrete hull.[114]

Mid Atlantic

To promote wind power in New Jersey, in 2007 the state awarded a $4.4 million contract to conduct an 18-month Ocean/Wind Power Ecological Baseline Study, becoming the first state to sponsor an ocean and wind power study before allowing renewable energy developers to study and build off its shores. The study focused on a designated area off the coast to determine the current distribution, abundance and migratory patterns of avian species, fish, marine resources and sea turtle use of the existing ecological resources.[115] The results of the study were released in June 2010. The study concluded that the effects of developing offshore windfarms would be negligible.[116][117][118]

In 2008, new federal rules greatly expanded the territory offshore wind parks can be built. Previously, projects were only allowed in shallow state waters within 3 nautical miles (5.6 km) of shore. The edge of U.S. territory is about 200 nautical miles (370 km) out. Increased distance from the coast diminishes their visibility. Waters off the coast of the United States are deeper than in Europe, requiring different designs.[119]

Atlantic Wind Connection is a proposed electrical transmission backbone to be built off the Atlantic Coast of the United States to serve offshore wind farms. The transmission line, proposed by Trans-Elect Development Company, would deliver power ashore in southern Virginia, Delaware, southern New Jersey and northern New Jersey. As a first of its kind project, it poses significant risks of encountering unexpected technological challenges and cost overruns.[120] Such an offshore backbone is an element in the national electric power strategy.[107] Bechtel has been selected as the EPC contractor and Alstom as technical advisor for the first phase of the development for the project.[121] Google and Good Energies, an investment firm, are the major investors in the $5 billion project.[120]

Ocean Wind is a proposed utility-scale offshore wind farm with a capacity of 1100MW to be located on the Outer Continental Shelf approximately 15 miles (24 km) off the coast of Atlantic City, New Jersey. If built it will be the largest in the U.S.[122] In September 2020, New Jersey officials halted the Ørsted Ocean Wind Project citing concerns about misrepresented economic benefits of offshore wind, including construction of monopoles, utilization of women- and minority-owned businesses, union labor, possible negative effects on the fishing industry.[123][124]

Wind energy meteorology

Upper: the propagation of transient waves. Lower: the time and spatial variation of the related capacity factor values (CF) at 100m. The power curves and technical parameters for the GE 2.5 MW turbines is used to calculate the instantaneous capacity factor.[125]

Winds in the Central Plains region of the U.S. are variable on both short (minutes) and long (days) time scales. Variations in wind speed result in variations in power output from wind farms, which poses difficulties incorporating wind power into an integrated power system. Wind turbines are driven by boundary layer winds, those that occur near the surface of the earth, at around 300 feet. Boundary layer winds are controlled by wind in the higher free atmosphere and have turbulence due to interaction with surface features such as trees, hills, and buildings. Short term or high frequency variations are due to this turbulence in the boundary layer.[125]

Long term variations are due to the passage of transient waves in the atmosphere, with a characteristic time scale of several days. The transient waves that influence wind in the Central U.S. are large scale and this results in the power output from wind farms in the region being somewhat correlated and not entirely independent. Large scale distribution of wind farms significantly reduce short term variability, limiting the relative standard deviation of the capacity factor to about 45%.[125] The correlation is highest in summer and lowest in winter.[126]

Environmental Impacts and Regulations

Bird protection

The US federal government has jurisdiction to prevent bird and bat deaths by wind turbines, under the Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Under the 2009 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Interior Department could issue permits to allow "non-purposeful take" for activities where eagle deaths were considered unavoidable; however, as of December 2013, no take permits had been issued to wind energy developers.[127] The United States Fish and Wildlife Service has published voluntary guidelines for design and siting of wind turbines to minimize bird and bat deaths.[128]

In 2013, the Obama administration was accused of having a double standard to protect the wind industry from Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act prosecutions, while vigorously pursuing violations by oil companies and owners of power lines. The administration refused to divulge the number of raptor deaths reported to it by wind companies, saying that to do so would reveal trade secrets. The government also ordered federal law enforcement field agents not to pursue bird-death prosecutions against wind companies without prior approval from Washington. The policy was said to be an environmental trade-off to promote renewable energy.[129]

In November 2013, the federal government obtained its first criminal conviction of a wind power operator for killing protected birds in violation of the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Duke Energy plead guilty, and was fined $1 million, for the deaths of 160 birds, including 14 golden eagles, at two wind farms in Wyoming. The Justice Department charged that Duke had designed and sited the turbines knowing that they would kill birds; Duke noted that it had self-reported the bird deaths, and that US Fish and Wildlife Service guidelines for reducing bird deaths by wind turbines had not been issued when the turbines were built. After they were charged, Duke implemented a radar detection system, at a cost of $600,000 per year, designed to turn off turbines when approached by large birds; the company noted that the system was working, as no golden eagle deaths had been observed in more than a year of operation since the radar was installed.[130][131]

In December 2013 the US Fish and Wildlife Service announced that it would issue 30-year permits to wind energy projects to allow for eagle deaths; previously, permits had been available for only 5 years, but none were issued to wind projects. Under the 30-year permits, wind power developers would be required to report eagle deaths, and the permits would be reviewed every 5 years. The measure was intended to remove what was seen as legal uncertainty discouraging wind energy investments. The government said that an environmental review was not needed for the change, because it was only an administrative change.[127] The new regulation was welcomed by the American Wind Energy Association, which said that wind power caused less than two percent of human-caused eagle fatalities, and pointed out that the rules would require extensive mitigation and monitoring of eagle deaths.[132] The extension of eagle taking permits from 5 to 30 years was opposed by a number of conservation groups, including the American Bird Conservancy, the Nature Conservancy, the Sierra Club, the Audubon Society, and the Humane Society of the United States.[133][134]

More than 30,000 wind turbine locations are within federally protected bird habitats, out of which almost 24,000 lie in the migratory corridor of the whooping crane and almost 3000 in the breeding grounds of the endangered greater sage-grouse.[135] According to Dr. Michael Hutchins, the director of the American Bird Conservancy's Bird Smart Wind Energy Campaign, wind turbines present a threat to the nation's birds, and that the present permitting process is ineffective in addressing the issue. Concern about the bird deaths prompted the American Bird Conservancy and 70 other conservation organizations, to lobby the U.S. Department of Interior to develop a National Programmatic Wind Environmental Impact Statement which would identify appropriate areas for wind energy development, as well as areas where development should be avoided, but these lobbying efforts failed.[135] Tom Vinson, the American Wind Energy Association vice president for regulatory affairs noted the ambiguity in estimation and extrapolation of various data and also questioned the credibility of the assumptions of organizations such as American Bird Conservancy in estimating future bird deaths.[135]

Collision risks are primarily influenced by the height of the turbines and tower type. The average death count of birds increases as turbine heights reach 475 to 639 feet. Danger to birds increases because blades at higher altitudes overlap with the average flight height of nocturnally migrating birds.[136]

Offshore wind

All offshore wind development requires either federal or state approval and a lease since offshore land is government property.[137] Offshore wind regulation authority has shifted through several federal agencies since the early 2000s. Prior to 2005, offshore wind turbine and farm permits were under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers.[138] In 2005, with the passing of the Energy Policy Act, the Minerals Management Service within the Department of the Interior had authority over wind turbine development on federal waters, like the Outer Continental Shelf, and was responsible for evaluating economic value, potential environmental impacts, and coordinating with federal and state agencies when approving wind power permits.[139] Finally, in 2010, the Minerals Management Service was divided into three agencies, of which the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is responsible for leasing, permitting, monitoring, and regulating offshore wind energy.[140]

The harassment of any marine mammal species in U.S. waters is a violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (50 CFR 18). Offshore wind developers are required to apply for a letter of authorization or Incidental Harassment Authorization with all the pertinent details of the species under potential threat from their offshore activities, the mitigation measures, and monitoring and reporting obligations. Offshore wind projects must also comply with all regulatory obligations contained in the Federally approved State coastal management plan, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, to keep in check their effect on coastal resources.[141]

Statistics

United States wind generation (GWh)[2][142]
Year Total % of total Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1990 2,789
1991 2,951
1992 2,888
1993 3,006
1994 3,447
1995 3,164
1996 3,234
1997 3,288
1998 3,026
1999 4,488
2000 5,593
2001 6,737
2002 10,354
2003 10,729
2004 14,144 0.36% 999 1,022 1,291 1,295 1,702 1,397 1,164 1,051 1,090 1,029 932 1,172
2005 14,597 0.36% 899 783 1,235 1,408 1,494 1,539 1,171 918 1,275 1,256 1,363 1,257
2006 26,589 0.65% 2,383 1,922 2,359 2,472 2,459 2,052 1,955 1,655 1,879 2,442 2,540 2,472
2007 32,143 0.77% 2,459 2,541 3,061 3,194 2,858 2,395 1,928 2,446 2,641 3,056 2,705 2,859
2008 55,363 1.34% 4,273 3,852 4,782 5,225 5,340 5,140 4,008 3,264 3,111 4,756 4,994 6,616
2009 73,886 1.87% 5,951 5,852 7,099 7,458 6,262 5,599 4,955 5,464 4,651 6,814 6,875 6,906
2010 94,652 2.29% 6,854 5,432 8,589 9,764 8,698 8,049 6,724 6,686 7,106 7,944 9,748 9,059
2011 120,177 2.93% 8,550 10,452 10,545 12,422 11,772 10,985 7,489 7,476 6,869 10,525 12,439 10,656
2012 140,822 3.48% 13,632 11,052 14,026 12,709 12,541 11,972 8,822 8,469 8,790 12,636 11,649 14,524
2013 167,665 4.13% 14,633 13,907 15,643 17,294 16,264 13,766 11,146 9,593 11,709 13,720 15,888 14,100
2014 181,791 4.44% 17,989 14,001 17,779 18,747 15,532 15,691 12,096 10,187 11,473 14,552 18,997 14,696
2015 190,927 4.67% 15,258 14,964 15,361 17,835 17,060 13,398 13,632 13,040 13,859 16,391 19,693 20,067
2016 226,551 5.55% 18,511 20,214 21,752 20,555 18,824 16,364 17,589 13,565 16,435 20,376 19,334 23,032
2017 254,254 6.33% 20,270 21,692 25,599 25,403 22,317 19,429 15,711 13,094 17,291 24,789 23,320 22,776
2018 274,952 6.58% 26,834 23,936 27,275 26,757 23,405 24,411 15,897 19,507 17,991 21,154 22,493 24,825
2019 300,071 7.29% 25,165 23,047 26,036 30,217 26,474 23,400 22,470 19,867 24,299 28,144 25,656 27,183
2020 305,409 8.34% 28,403 29,235 29,483 29,534 28,180 30,147 22,700 22,571 23,176 29,419 33,848
Last entry, % of Total 8.37% 9.22% 9.64% 10.74% 9.29% 8.54% 5.50% 5.65% 6.94% 9.36% 11.22% 8.06%

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d "AWEA 4th quarter 2014 Public Market Report" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). January 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 19, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  2. ^ a b "Electric Power Monthly" (PDF). Report. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. March 4, 2015.
  3. ^ a b "AWEA 3rd quarter 2019 Public Market Report" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). January 2020. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  4. ^ "GWEC, Global Wind Report 2015, Annual Market Update" (PDF).
  5. ^ a b "AWEA 3rd quarter 2019 Public Market Report" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). September 2019. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
  6. ^ Druzin, Rye (August 23, 2018). "Texas wind generation keeps growing, state remains at No. 1". Houston Chronicle.
  7. ^ a b c "AWEA 2016 Fourth Quarter Market Report". AWEA. American Wind Energy Association. Archived from the original on February 11, 2017. Retrieved February 9, 2017.
  8. ^ a b c "Alta Wind Energy Center is the nation's largest wind facility". California Energy Commission. California Energy Commission. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  9. ^ a b "Annual Wind Industry Report, Year Ending 2008" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association. 2009. pp. 9–10. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 20, 2009.
  10. ^ Corporation, Bonnier (February 16, 2017). Popular Science. Bonnier Corporation.
  11. ^ "Wind Energy Center Alumni | Wind Energy Center". www.umass.edu. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  12. ^ Smith, D. R. (January 1, 1987). "The Wind Farms of the Altamont Pass Area". Annual Review of Energy. 12 (1): 145–183. doi:10.1146/annurev.eg.12.110187.001045.
  13. ^ a b c Downey, John. "As Duke Energy claims spots among largest U.S. wind projects, more are on the way". www.bizjournals.com. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  14. ^ Shepherds Flat wind farm opening
  15. ^ "Meadow Lake Wind Farm". EDP Renewabes. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  16. ^ Eileen O'Grady. E.ON completes world's largest wind farm in Texas, Reuters, October 1, 2009.
  17. ^ "Limon Wind Energy Center" (PDF). NextEra Energy. Retrieved April 14, 2019.
  18. ^ Ron Pernick (2012). "Clean Energy Trends 2012" (PDF). Clean Edge. p. 5.
  19. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Levelized cost of new generation resources, 28 January 2013.
  20. ^ "Kansas Senate chairman cuts off questions about Koch funding at energy hearing". The Wichita Eagle.
  21. ^ Dave Levinthal. "Inside the Koch brothers' campus crusade". Center for Public Integrity.
  22. ^ "The True Benefits of Wind Power". Newsweek. April 21, 2015. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  23. ^ Shauna Theel (July 7, 2015). "Koch-funded study on cost of wind flawed throughout". American Wind Energy Association. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  24. ^ Simmons, Randy; Yonk, Ryan; Hansen, Megan (July 2015), The True Cost of Energy: Wind (PDF), Utah State University, retrieved July 7, 2015
  25. ^ "Electric Power Monthly" (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy. February 2013. Retrieved February 16, 2013.
  26. ^ "Electric Power Monthly" (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy. February 2014. Retrieved February 22, 2014.
  27. ^ "Electricity Data Browser". U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
  28. ^ "Wind Powering America: Installed U.S. Wind Capacity and Wind Project Locations". U.S. Department of Energy. January 19, 2012. Archived from the original on March 14, 2014. Retrieved January 19, 2012.
  29. ^ a b "WINDExchange: Installed Wind Capacity". energy.gov. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, United States Department of Energy. March 5, 2010. Retrieved January 24, 2017.
  30. ^ "U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2014 Market Report" (PDF). AWEA. January 27, 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2016. Retrieved March 7, 2016.
  31. ^ 2017 Wind Technologies Market Report
  32. ^ WINDExchange: U.S. Installed and Potential Wind Power Capacity and Generation
  33. ^ "AWEA 4th quarter 2013 Public Market Report" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). January 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 27, 2014. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  34. ^ Kingdom, Elsevier Ltd, The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, United. "Global wind industry statistics 2008 - Renewable Energy Focus". www.renewableenergyfocus.com. Retrieved February 16, 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  35. ^ Diane Cardwell (March 20, 2014). "Wind Industry's New Technologies Are Helping It Compete on Price". New York Times.
  36. ^ a b c d "2014 Wind Technologies Market Report" (PDF). Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. August 2015. Retrieved January 24, 2016.
  37. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Table 6.7B, Capacity factors, Electric Power Monthly, October 2014.
  38. ^ "New Wind Resource Maps and Wind Potential Estimates for the United States". WINDExchange, DOE. February 19, 2010. Retrieved January 24, 2017.
  39. ^ "Estimates of Windy Land Area and Wind Energy Potential by State for Areas >= 30% Capacity Factor at 80m" (.xls). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). February 4, 2010. Retrieved January 24, 2017.
  40. ^ "U.S. Wind Resource even Larger than Previously Estimated: Government Assessment" (Press release). American Wind Energy Association. February 18, 2010. Archived from the original on February 24, 2010.
  41. ^ "Alaska 50-Meter Wind Resource Map". Wind Powering America, DOE. Archived from the original on November 25, 2010. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
  42. ^ "Hawaii 80-Meter Wind Resource Map". Wind Powering America, DOE. Archived from the original on October 15, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2011.
  43. ^ Lu, Xi; McElroy, Michael; Kiviluoma, Juha (June 22, 2009). "Global potential for wind generated electricity" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (27): 10933–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904101106. PMC 2700152. PMID 19549865. Retrieved June 27, 2009.
  44. ^ Schwartz, Marc; Heimiller, Donna (June 2010). "Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy Resources for the United States" (PDF). National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL). Retrieved September 10, 2010.
  45. ^ Margolis, Jason (June 13, 2019). "US looking to harness the ocean winds with British help". BBC. Retrieved June 14, 2019.
  46. ^ a b c "20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply" (PDF). United States Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. July 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 2, 2013. Retrieved May 24, 2014. July 2008
  47. ^ a b "Strengthening America's Energy Security with Offshore Wind" (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy. February 2011.
  48. ^ Zehnder, Alan; Warhaft, Zellman. "University Collaboration on Wind Energy" (PDF). Cornell University. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 1, 2011. Retrieved January 23, 2012.
  49. ^ Corina Rivera Linares. "While investment may slow in coming years, plenty of transmission construction, investment happening". Archived from the original on May 30, 2016. Retrieved March 22, 2016. Alt URL
  50. ^ Herman K. Trabish (February 17, 2016). "Powered by PTC, wind energy expected to keep booming despite Clean Power Plan stay". Utility Dive. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
  51. ^ "US wind generation reached 5.5% of the grid in 2016". American Wind Energy Association. March 6, 2017. Archived from the original on March 19, 2017. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
  52. ^ a b EERE - U.S. Wind Power Achieves Landmark Installed Capacity[permanent dead link]
  53. ^ Branstad, Terry. "Iowa has the blueprint for energy independence". Governor's Wind Energy Coalition. Retrieved September 3, 2015.
  54. ^ "Electric Power Monthly". U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  55. ^ "AWEA 4th quarter 2013 Public Market Report" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). January 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 20, 2016. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  56. ^ Galbraith, Kate (July 19, 2008). "Texas Approves a $4.93 Billion Wind-Power Project". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  57. ^ "2009 Wind Technologies Market Report" (PDF). Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. August 18, 2010. Retrieved March 6, 2016.
  58. ^ EC&R Completes 780-MW Roscoe Wind Farm Renewable Energy World, 2 October 2009.
  59. ^ O'Grady, Eileen (October 1, 2009). "E.ON completes world's largest wind farm in Texas". Reuters.
  60. ^ Weise, Elizabeth; Jervis, Rick (October 18, 2019). "Turbines to the max: Texas produces more wind energy than nearly anywhere else in the world". USA TODAY. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
  61. ^ "AWEA 3rd Quarter 2008 Market Report" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association. October 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 25, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  62. ^ "Texas operational wind plants (As of 7/06)" (PDF). Texas Renewable Energy Industries Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 30, 2006.
  63. ^ 196 Wind Turbines Cranking Out Power
  64. ^ E.ON Delivers 335-MW of Wind in Texas
  65. ^ a b c d "Wind Energy in Iowa" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  66. ^ Karen Ulenhuth. "MidAmerican Energy installing a concrete tower for the tallest land-based wind turbine in the U.S." Midwest Energy News. RE-AMP. Retrieved November 20, 2015.
  67. ^ "Iowa to extend wind power lead as Invenergy plans 400 MW". Utility Dive. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  68. ^ "Wind Energy". Oklahoma Department of Commerce. Archived from the original on January 15, 2014. Retrieved January 14, 2014.
  69. ^ staff. "Kansas is propelling growth in wind energy". Governors Wind Energy Coalition. Retrieved January 14, 2014.
  70. ^ Utility-Scale Land-Based 80-Meter Wind Maps. WINDExchange. U.S. Dept. of Energy. Retrieved 2 February 2017.
  71. ^ "California Daily Renewables Watch" (PDF). California ISO. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  72. ^ "Overview of Wind Energy in California". California Energy Commission. May 15, 2009. Retrieved December 2, 2009.
  73. ^ a b c "U.S. Wind Energy Projects – Washington". American Wind Energy Association. July 2010. Archived from the original on December 31, 2008. Retrieved July 28, 2010.
  74. ^ "Illinois Incentives/Policies for Renewables & Efficiency". Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency. U.S. Dept. of Energy. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved May 17, 2010.
  75. ^ "WIND ENERGY FACTS: ILLINOIS" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 15, 2013. Retrieved February 17, 2013.
  76. ^ E. Lantz, M. Hand, and R. Wiser (May 13–17, 2012) "The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy," National Renewable Energy Laboratory conference paper no. 6A20-54526, page 4
  77. ^ a b c "The Economic Reach of Wind". www.renewableenergyworld.com. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  78. ^ "Acciona Celebrates Completion of First Wind Turbine Production Plant in U.S." Technology For Life. January 20, 2008. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  79. ^ "enXco Closes Financing on Shiloh II Wind Project". www.renewableenergyworld.com. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  80. ^ "DOE Announces Effort to Advance U.S. Wind Power Manufacturing Capacity". Energy.gov. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  81. ^ a b Wiser, Ryan H., and Mark Bolinger. "2014 Wind Technologies Market Report" page v+56. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, August 2015.
  82. ^ "New Wind Power Partnerships to Benefit Industry and Nation - News Releases | NREL". www.nrel.gov. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  83. ^ "UPC Wind Signs Agreement with Department of Energy to Establish National Wind technology Center on Maui". First Wind. April 1, 2008. Archived from the original on December 28, 2008. Retrieved December 2, 2009.
  84. ^ "Secretary Chu Announces Efforts to Strengthen U.S. Electric Transmission Networks". Energy.gov. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  85. ^ "National Electric Transmission Congestion Study | Department of Energy". energy.gov. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  86. ^ US Dept. of Energy, Renewable electricity production tax credit, accessed 20 July 2015.
  87. ^ Wind Power Today 2010. EERE Wind Energy Technologies Office and Water Power Technologies Office. May 2010.
  88. ^ a b Gerhardt, Tina (January 6, 2013). "Wind Energy Gets a Boost off Fiscal Cliff Deal". The Progressive.
  89. ^ "Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit (PTC) | Department of Energy". energy.gov. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  90. ^ "Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2013". Analysis & Projections. Energy Information Administration. March 23, 2015. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  91. ^ "Forget Oil Exports—What Just Happened to Solar is a Really Big Deal". Bloomberg.com. December 17, 2015. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  92. ^ Jones, Tim (December 11, 2007). "More farmers seeing wind as cash crop". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved December 6, 2008.
  93. ^ Lester R. Brown (2006). "Stabilizing Climate" (PDF). Plan B 2.0 Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble. NY: W.W. Norton & Co. p. 191. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 26, 2007.
  94. ^ "Legendary Texas oilman embraces wind power". Star Tribune. July 25, 2008. Archived from the original on July 27, 2008. Retrieved August 24, 2008.
  95. ^ Fahey, Anna (July 9, 2008). "Texas Oil Man Says We Can Break the Addiction". Sightline Daily. Retrieved August 24, 2008.
  96. ^ "T. Boone Pickens Places $2 Billion Order for GE Wind Turbines". Wind Today Magazine. May 16, 2008. Archived from the original on October 1, 2008. Retrieved August 24, 2008.
  97. ^ Star, The Prairie. "Ag Weekly". www.agweekly.com. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  98. ^ "Gone with the wind", New Scientist, 8 July 2006, pp. 36–39.
  99. ^ "WINDExchange: Resources and Tools for Siting Wind Turbines". apps2.eere.energy.gov. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  100. ^ a b Bollinger, Mark (August 2014). "2013 Wind Technologies Market Report". LBNL.
  101. ^ a b "Landmark Report Analyzes Current State of U.S. Offshore Wind Industry" (PDF). NREL Highlights. 2011.
  102. ^ a b c Environmental and Energy Study Institute. "Offshore Wind Factsheet".
  103. ^ Jeremy Firestone, Willett Kempton. "Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 9, 2011.
  104. ^ Dan Wilhelmsson; et al. "Greening Blue Energy: Identifying and managing the biodiversity risks and opportunities of offshore renewable energy" (PDF). International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
  105. ^ "DOI Announces Five Exploratory Leases for Offshore Wind Energy". www.renewableenergyworld.com. Retrieved February 16, 2017.
  106. ^ "Areas under consideration for wind energy areas". U.S. Department of Energy. Archived from the original on February 12, 2011. Retrieved February 8, 2011.
  107. ^ a b "A national offshore wind strategy: Creating an offshore wind energy industry in the United States" (PDF). U.S. Department of Energy. February 7, 2011. p. 33. Retrieved February 8, 2011. … no wind turbines are installed in U.S. waters, …
  108. ^ Lord, Peter B. (April 24, 2009). "Deepwater wind project making headway". The Providence Journal. Retrieved April 29, 2009.
  109. ^ "Rhode Island Chooses Deepwater Wind to Build Off-Shore Wind Farm". RenewableEnergyWorld.com. September 30, 2008. Retrieved April 29, 2009.
  110. ^ Nesi, Ted (April 22, 2009). "U.S. offshore wind rules expected today". Providence Business News. Archived from the original on April 26, 2009. Retrieved April 29, 2009.
  111. ^ Turkel, Tux (January 3, 2010). "Offshore wind power: Can Maine afford it?". Portland Press Herald. Retrieved January 8, 2010. [dead link]
  112. ^ "SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS 2 FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MAINE'S DEEPWATER OFFSHORE FLOATING WIND TURBINE TESTING AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT" (PDF). United States Department of Energy. United States Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
  113. ^ "Volturnus". University of Maine Advanced Structures and Composites Center. University of Maine. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
  114. ^ "New England Aqua Ventus I - The Project". Maine Aqua Ventus. Maine Aqua Ventus. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
  115. ^ "GMI Awarded New Jersey Ocean/Wind Power Ecological Baseline Studies". North American Wind Power. November 15, 2007. Retrieved June 6, 2011.
  116. ^ "Offshore Wind Energy Study Puts New Jersey in Lead Nationally in Creating Environmentally Safer Energy Source". New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. June 18, 2010. Retrieved June 6, 2011.
  117. ^ Conaboy, Chelsea (June 19, 2010), "Study favorable for proposed N.J. offshore wind farms", Philadelphia Inquirer, retrieved June 3, 2011
  118. ^ "Ocean/Wind Power Baseline Ecological Studies". State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. July 23, 2010. Retrieved June 6, 2011.
  119. ^ Waltz, Emily (October 20, 2008), "Offshore Wind May Power the Future Not only are offshore winds stronger but landlubbers have fewer objections to turbines almost invisible from the coast", Scientific America, retrieved June 6, 2011
  120. ^ a b "Offshore Wind Power Line Wins Praise, and Backing" article by Matthew L. Wald in The New York Times October 12, 2010, Accessed October 12, 2010
  121. ^ Frank Maisano (January 17, 2013). "Offshore Wind Transmission Project Selects Bechtel, Alstom to Build Historic Project" (PDF) (Press release). Atlantic Grid Development, LLC. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
  122. ^ Warren, Michael Sol (June 21, 2019). "N.J. just gave the green light to build the nation's largest offshore wind farm". nj.
  123. ^ "Lawmakers Among Doubters of NJ Offshore Wind Plans". NJ Spotlight News. September 14, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  124. ^ "NJ Opens Window for More Offshore-Wind Projects". NJ Spotlight News. September 10, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  125. ^ a b c Junling Huang, Xi Lu and Michael B. McElroy (2014). "Meteorologically defined limits to reduction in the variability of outputs from a coupled wind farm system in the Central US" (PDF). Renewable Energy. 62: 331–340 (p13+15+26). doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.022.
  126. ^ Lu, Xi; McElroya, Michael B.; Kiviluoma, Juha (July 2009). "Global potential for wind-generated electricity: Correlation table between Montana (MT), Minnesota (MN), and Texas (TX)". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (27): 10933–10938. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904101106. PMC 2700152. PMID 19549865.
  127. ^ a b Associated Press, "US to allow eagle deaths – to aid wind power", Washington Post, 6 Dec. 2013.
  128. ^ "Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines" (PDF). United States Fish and Wildlife Service. March 23, 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 28, 2014.
  129. ^ Dina Cappiello, "Wind farms get pass on eagle deaths", Associated Press, 14 May 2013.
  130. ^ Soumya Karlamangla, "Energy company to pay $1 million in wind turbine eagle deaths", Los Angeles Times, 24 Nov. 2013.
  131. ^ Eyder Peralta, Duke Energy Pleads Guilty Over Eagle Deaths At Wind Farms", National Public Radio, 23 Nov. 2013.
  132. ^ "AWEA Statement on U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's Eagle Permit Tenure Rule". American Wind Energy Association. December 6, 2013. Archived from the original on December 11, 2013.
  133. ^ American Bird Conservancy, Opposition to 30-Year Eagle Take Permits, accessed 8 December 2013.
  134. ^ "Interior Dept. Rule Greenlights Eagle Slaughter at Wind Farms, Says Audubon CEO". Audubon. December 5, 2013.
  135. ^ a b c Casey, Michael (May 20, 2015). "30,000 wind turbines located in critical bird habitats". CBS News.
  136. ^ "Wind Turbines". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  137. ^ Snyder, Brian; Kaiser, Mark J. (November 1, 2009). "Offshore wind power in the US: Regulatory issues and models for regulation". Energy Policy. 37 (11): 4442–4453. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.064. ISSN 0301-4215.
  138. ^ "Offshore Wind Development: Federal Permitting Program Challenges - Environmental & Energy Law Program". Harvard Law School. March 24, 2020. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  139. ^ Musial, W.; Butterfield, S.; Ram, B. (2006). "Energy From Offshore Wind". Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas, USA. doi:10.4043/18355-MS. OSTI 876430.
  140. ^ "Salazar Divides MMS's Three Conflicting Missions". www.doi.gov. May 19, 2010. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  141. ^ "Wildlife protection laws and offshore wind energy development in the US". American Wind Energy Association. Archived from the original on January 4, 2017.
  142. ^ "Electric Power Monthly - U.S. Energy Information Administration". www.eia.gov. Retrieved May 8, 2019.
  143. ^ "Electric Power Annual". US Energy Information Administration. Retrieved June 2, 2018.
  144. ^ "Electric Power Monthly". US Energy Information Administration.