Talk:Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:46, 16 February 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Government

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Government

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

Misleading statment

I removed from the lede the statement "The United States is currently one of only seven countries in the world that allows abortion after 20 weeks (the others are Canada, China, Netherlands, North Korea, Singapore, and Vietnam)".

Firstly, the source was not reliable. Secondly, what it meant to say (according to the source) was that abortion after 20 weeks on demand (ie. without restriction as to reason) is permmited only in 7 countries. Abortion for various reasons (ie for health reasons, when the pregnancy is the result of rape, when the fetus is malformed etc) is legal after 20 weeks in many countries. Also the list of countries which allow abortion on demand after 20 weeks includes some parts of Australia (where the law varies by state - Abortion in Australia), which were not mentioned.2A02:2F01:504F:FFFF:0:0:6465:491D (talk) 03:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To give you an example, abortion in the UK is not permitted at all on demand, but is permitted on liberal grounds until 24 weeks, and on restricted grounds after 24 weeks. (Abortion Act 1967). So if you want a discussion on gestational limits in various jurisdictions, you have to be very careful, as abortion is often not a question of "legal vs illegal". Abortion at a specific gestational age may be, for instance, legal on socioeconomic grounds or on broad health reasons (including risk to mental/psychological health, interpreted in a very liberal way).2A02:2F01:504F:FFFF:0:0:6465:491D (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, in most countries of Europe, abortion after the first trimester until 22-28 weeks (depending on countries) is permitted on a variety of grounds. I don't think that a discussion on comparative law should be in the lede, but if a mention is made it must be done in a neutral and non-misleading way.2A02:2F01:504F:FFFF:0:0:6465:491D (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Washington Post is regarded as a reliable source here. I added the word "elective" to the sentence to resolve your concern. The rest of your comment is original research. Instaurare (talk) 17:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sen. Romney reintroduces bill

Mitt Romney just reintroduced this bill in Congress, was wondering if it should get its own article or an amendment to this one. Thanks, XP6287 (talk) 18:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC) https://kutv.com/news/local/romney-reintroduces-bill-banning-abortion-after-20-weeks-of-pregnancy[reply]

Similar state laws

I can barely see the difference between the #6F3198 (dark purple) "Banned based on fetal pain" and #2F3699 (reddish mid-blue) "Ban enacted not based on basis of fetal pain". It would be adventagious to fix this. I tried to change the #6F3198 to #F36533 (orange'ish) [chosen at https://www.color-hex.com]; but I have no idea how to edit the U.S. Map .SVG file to match. I wish someone that can edit .SVG files would fix this needless use of two very close colors when only 4 colors are needed and there is a vast array of colors that would be easily seen as different from the others.