User:Timberlack/XfD log: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Timberlack (talk | contribs) Logging AfD nomination of Induna.com. |
Timberlack (talk | contribs) Logging AfD nomination of Getit. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
# [[:Induna.com]]: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Induna.com|nominated]] at [[WP:AFD|AfD]]; notified {{user|1=Rajeshbieee}} 06:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
# [[:Induna.com]]: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Induna.com|nominated]] at [[WP:AFD|AfD]]; notified {{user|1=Rajeshbieee}} 06:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
#* '''Reason''': I am unable to locate any [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] with [[WP:CORPDEPTH|in-depth information on the company]] and containing [[WP:ORGIND|independent content]], references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/[[WP:NCORP]]. |
#* '''Reason''': I am unable to locate any [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] with [[WP:CORPDEPTH|in-depth information on the company]] and containing [[WP:ORGIND|independent content]], references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/[[WP:NCORP]]. |
||
# [[:Getit]]: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Getit|nominated]] at [[WP:AFD|AfD]]; notified {{user|1=Prithamoitra}} 06:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
#* '''Reason''': Advertisement of the company. references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. |
|||
Revision as of 06:40, 16 February 2021
This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.
If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.
February 2021
- Naman Y. Goyal: nominated at AfD; notified Shreesh.shrimali (talk · contribs) 05:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Do not show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:RS
- Salil Singhal: nominated at AfD; notified Samuell1616 (talk · contribs) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
- Induna.com: nominated at AfD; notified Rajeshbieee (talk · contribs) 06:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.
- Getit: nominated at AfD; notified Prithamoitra (talk · contribs) 06:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Reason: Advertisement of the company. references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.