Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanya Ananya: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m sig |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Keep''': My [[WP:BEFORE]] gave me 79 results only in Google News, several mentions in Times of India, Film Critics etc., meets [[WP:GNG]] [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 06:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''': My [[WP:BEFORE]] gave me 79 results only in Google News, several mentions in Times of India, Film Critics etc., meets [[WP:GNG]] [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 06:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
::*'''Comment''' — @{{u|CommanderWaterford}}, please see [[WP:SIGN]] & do so each time you make a comment for the sake of clarity(please do so immediately) Furthermore, I’m afraid your knowledge of policy pertaining to [[WP:N|''notability'']] might be inadequate & I do not believe you possess sufficient knowledge on [[WP:GNG]]. The number of sources google news popped up isn’t relevant but what matters is the quality of those sources. Mere mentions do not satisfy [[WP:SIGCOV]] thus such sources are of zero relevance to [[WP:GNG]] which requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore per [[WP:NACTOR]] she doesn’t meet the threshold as no criterion is satisfied as she is yet to be featured in lead roles neither has she won a prestigious award for actors. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 23:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
::*'''Comment''' — @{{u|CommanderWaterford}}, please see [[WP:SIGN]] & do so each time you make a comment for the sake of clarity(please do so immediately) Furthermore, I’m afraid your knowledge of policy pertaining to [[WP:N|''notability'']] might be inadequate & I do not believe you possess sufficient knowledge on [[WP:GNG]]. The number of sources google news popped up isn’t relevant but what matters is the quality of those sources. Mere mentions do not satisfy [[WP:SIGCOV]] thus such sources are of zero relevance to [[WP:GNG]] which requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore per [[WP:NACTOR]] she doesn’t meet the threshold as no criterion is satisfied as she is yet to be featured in lead roles neither has she won a prestigious award for actors. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 23:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' non notable actor with no major roles. There is no significant coverage in RS.[[User:Ruqayya ansari|Ruqayya ansari]] ([[User talk:Ruqayya ansari|talk]]) 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:43, 19 February 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dhanya Ananya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable actor who doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR as she hasn’t won any prestigious awards neither has she taken up significant roles in the movies she has featured in, generally, a before search shows she lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her, thus this is also a GNG fail Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: My WP:BEFORE gave me 79 results only in Google News, several mentions in Times of India, Film Critics etc., meets WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 06:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment — @CommanderWaterford, please see WP:SIGN & do so each time you make a comment for the sake of clarity(please do so immediately) Furthermore, I’m afraid your knowledge of policy pertaining to notability might be inadequate & I do not believe you possess sufficient knowledge on WP:GNG. The number of sources google news popped up isn’t relevant but what matters is the quality of those sources. Mere mentions do not satisfy WP:SIGCOV thus such sources are of zero relevance to WP:GNG which requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore per WP:NACTOR she doesn’t meet the threshold as no criterion is satisfied as she is yet to be featured in lead roles neither has she won a prestigious award for actors. Celestina007 (talk) 23:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete non notable actor with no major roles. There is no significant coverage in RS.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)