Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A C Kadloor: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:01, 19 February 2021

A C Kadloor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant resumé and autobio with extreme undue detail. Most sources are primary. Gaioa (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Gaioa (T C L) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Does he hold office? I'm not even sure if he was elected; the article needs a rewrite in order to prove notability and for better readability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He participated in the election to become a member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly thrice, but he did not win a seat. Therefore, he does not pass WP:NPOL. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't seem he has actually won any of the elections he contested, so fails WP:NPOL. Doesn't appear that he meets WP:GNG either. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPOL & WP:GNG. The article appears to have been created via the efforts of a sockfarm as well. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPOL and a WP:PROMOTIONAL stuff only. — Amkgp 💬 18:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No indication of nobility. RationalPuff (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. fails GNG. Timberlack (talk) 11:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPOL for never holding elected position - also is an obvious case of WP:PROMOTIONAL. Redoryxx (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He has not held any role that confers an automatic pass of WP:NPOL, and the article is not sourced anywhere near well enough to make him more notable than the norm for unelected political candidates or school superintendents. As always, notability is a question of demonstrating the importance of his work, not just verifying the existence of it. Bearcat (talk) 16:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:NPOL, not to mention is WP:AUTOBIO. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Delete''' fails [[WP:NPOL]] for never holding elected position - also is an obvious case of [[WP:PROMOTIONAL]]. [[User:Redoryxx|Redoryxx]] ([[User talk:Redoryxx|talk]]) 15:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. He has not held any role that confers an automatic pass of [[WP:NPOL]], and the article is not sourced anywhere near well enough to make him more notable than the norm for unelected political candidates or school superintendents. As always, notability is a question of demonstrating the ''importance'' of his work, not just verifying the ''existence'' of it. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 16:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as fails [[WP:NPOL]], not to mention is [[WP:AUTOBIO]]. -[[User:Kj cheetham|Kj cheetham]] ([[User talk:Kj cheetham|talk]]) 13:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)