Jump to content

User talk:KylieTastic: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Stneduc (talk | contribs)
26 edits
→final help: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
Line 276: Line 276:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohamed_Setrala [[User:Stneduc|Stneduc]] ([[User talk:Stneduc|talk]]) 13:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohamed_Setrala [[User:Stneduc|Stneduc]] ([[User talk:Stneduc|talk]]) 13:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

== The information I'm missing for my draft ==

Hello there. What are the stuff I am missing or are incorrect in my draft? Reviews, improper grammar, low on citation, not enough links? I hope you have a great day! ^^

Revision as of 13:51, 5 March 2021


View this userbox's documentationIt is approximately 1:11 PM where this user lives (Cambridge, UK).Refresh the time

I try to answer all questions, but I also have a busy real-life - If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse

Click to start a Question/section — Deleted image issue? Look up the files history here...

AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random...

Current Backlog: 1,798 pending submissions

 

Thank you

I just want to thank you for prettying up my page. CasaBasaSF (talk) 03:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)CasaBasaSF[reply]

A great improvement in readability. Thank you again for your generous time. CasaBasaSF (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)CasaBasaSF[reply]

Ranikot Fort

Hello. So apparently you reverted my changes to the Ranikot Fort page, where I basically corrected the spelling of Ranikot Fort which was misspelled in some places as "Rani kort forte". I also corrected a translation to "The great wall of Sindh" from "The Great Wall of Pakistan". Which was removed altogether. I would like to know why? 2400:ADC3:102:5400:7107:493C:ABAA:C949 (talk) 14:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, I noticed your edits as you broke the image, buy 'correcting' a filename. You also changed the title of the unesco.org reference from what it actually is. I then removed the "The great wall of Sindh" / "The Great Wall of Pakistan" as it was unsourced and had been marked as such since 2018 - If you have source please feel free to add back with the reference. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, thank you for the response. 2400:ADC3:102:5400:7107:493C:ABAA:C949 (talk) 15:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Kylie! Apparently someone has edited the history of the Ranikot fort page without providing any sources. I request you to please contact this person and ask for sources or revert the page back to what it was originally. Thank you. 116.71.4.82 (talk) 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi 116.71.4.82 I have reverted as unsourced (and they had removed sources) - but note you could have done this yourself as any editor can challenge any unsourced additions. I haven't left a talk page notice as these edits were made several days ago. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep this in mind. Thank you. 116.71.4.56 (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Review for Draft:Francis Baraan

Hello. I was hoping you could review Draft:Francis Baraan and assess if it's eligible to be moved to article space. And if you could help move it, that would be awesome! JanitorPH (talk) 03:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi JanitorPH sorry but to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next, although I generally avoid most WP:BLPs. I have however checked that it is submitted so it's just waiting. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt reply! Do you think it would be accepted, my draft? Thanks! JanitorPH (talk) 12:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! You should have been the reviewer and approver of my draft and my yet to be finished drafts! Ha ha! JanitorPH (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kylie! Greetings! Is there any way you could find 30 seconds to read my draft article, and advise if improvements should be made, or if it could actually be approved, and be moved to mainspace already? Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks! JanitorPH (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Submission declined

Hey Kylie, Just wondering, why you are declining my submission? I'm not really understanding the reason for why?

Thank you!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zach_Broom_(Pastor)

Information

Hi KylieTastic I believe this athlete doesn't really exist. What evidence do you have about him? Leaving aside the newspaper articles.

Best regards,

Giorgio Nassio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgio Nassio (talk • contribs) 18:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie, google is not a 100% reliable source as you well know. Money-making newspapers write anything. I believe the only reliable source is a certificate from an internationally recognized sports club. Greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgio Nassio (talk • contribs) 20:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have fixed all the issues you mentioned in my submission, can you please advise?

Regarding my submissions: Draft:Merlyn “Bud” Lea

I have 10+ references and corrected the Broadway listing as well with a new reference. Can you please advise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boottrax (talk • contribs) 14:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Boottrax thanks for fixing, adding more references and re-submitting. However to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

for the Barnstar, saw the SQL Query recently, nice work. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Al Haaj Bundoo Khan

Hi, Just got notification that you review my submission Al Haaj Bundoo Khan and rejected.

Can you help me to finalize the draft and make it publishable? I will provide you the details whatever is required and available to publish this article.

Thanks waiting for your help to make this possible Fahdaltaf (talk) 19:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks, i will rewrite and submit again Fahdaltaf (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I have fixed all the issues you mentioned in my submission, can you please review and advise? Fahdaltaf (talk) 19:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok :) Fahdaltaf (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:21:02, 21 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Adman511


Hello, I saw you recently reviewed my page submission for "Delta 8 (brand)" and I received and appreciated your comments. Im new to wikipedia and this is my first page I have tried to create. Could you offer me some pointers to (hopefully) pass review when I fix the errors and resubmit?

Adman511 (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Adman511 the first thing to understand is this is an encyclopedic and not for promotion and should be written from a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Currently it reads just like marketing. Secondly all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You only have one source, and although not trivial it is an interview which apart from the first paragraph appears to be full direct quotes so not independent. So at the moment it fails on neutrality and on notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 20:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:21:13, 22 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Kwiefling


Hi Reviewer - Thank you! I am the author of the article here: https://wiefling.com/catalytic-mechanisms-effortless-ways-to-change-behavior-for-the-better/ and I hold the rights to it, which I gladly share. Can you please help me? What do I need to do to use my own content here on Wikipedia? Thank you! - Kimberly

Kwiefling (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Kwiefling did you just add the CC BY note to the top of that source or did I miss if before? Also see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the general topic covering this area. However this just moves onto anther issue... Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia not a place for people to publish their own work. Content here should be backed by reliable source, and to be published all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). So to be accepted you would at least need to add the sources to show notability, and the content was verifiable See Wikipedia:Verifiability. Note that I didn't actually read the content for other issues (i.e. is it neutral encyclopedic content) however the first sentence reads more like a blog/essay than an encyclopedic article on "Catalytic Mechanisms". I;ve removed the request for a speedy delete, and I hope the above gives you some pointers. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NEW MESSAGE: Thank you Kylie! I just added the CC BY note in response to your helpful feedback. I get it that the concept of "Catalytic Mechanisms" is not widely written about. It's such a pity as the Harvard Business Review article by Jim Collins introduced the concept in 1999. I did include that reference to HBR. I was hoping that we could correct that. I also updated the article to be less blog/essay like. Any other advice greatly appreciated! - Kimberly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwiefling (talk • contribs) 19:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Kwiefling I would say just add what sources you can and re-submit. Note that although preferred sources do not have to be online (or freely available online) so if it has been written about in magazines, newspapers, journals etc those can be still be sources. KylieTastic (talk) 20:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2021-08

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • The visual editor will now use MediaSearch to find images. You can search for images on Commons in the visual editor when you are looking for illustrations. This is to help editors find better images. [1]
  • Advanced item The syntax highlighter now works with more languages: Futhark, Graphviz/DOT, CDDL and AMDGPU. [2]

Problems

  • Editing a timeline might have removed all text from it. This was because of a bug and has been fixed. You might need to edit the timeline again for it to show properly. [3]

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 February. It will be on all wikis from 25 February (calendar).

Future changes

  • Advanced item There is a user group for developers and users interested in working on Wikimedia wikis with the Rust programming language. You can join or tell others who want to make your wiki better in the future.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Draft:Godi Media

An article that you have been involved in editing—Draft:Godi Media—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 122.179.109.33 (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Draft nidhi tiwari

You had not done proper research and declined it. Resubmitted please do research properly thanproceed ahead Ankitaatiwarii (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The C996 in the article

Hi KylieTastic. Please note C996 (Thames Promenade) is a real route and a real highway. The route got commissioned last month. I don't know how to add a shield or how they work.

This is just for your info btw. Thanks, 61.69.229.211 (talk) 07:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice SQL query

Hey there. I ran across one of your SQL queries. [4] Just wanted to drop you a quick note and say thank you for making it. It's always cool to see stats for people using perms. I actually made a similar query for pending changes reviewers. [5] –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Donald E. Frith

Donald E. Frith draft needs approval. Let's get this going!! If there is anything you can do or you can change and help me, I would appreciate it. All is 100% done, I have referenced everything. Let's get this going!! If there is anything you can do or you can change and help me, I would appreciate it. All is 100% done, I have referenced everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marleyredd (talk • contribs) 21:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is done, and all is 100% solid. Let's Approve this.Marleyredd (talk) 03:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Marleyredd No it's not "100% solid" and you haven't "referenced everything" - All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You have one ref from 1960 so clearly does not support anything later,and the other ref is good but we need more to show notability. KylieTastic (talk) 10:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me finish it? I just need more experience to know what is needed. Please show me. I appreciate this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marleyredd (talk • contribs) 18:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry no - I have over a thousand other articles I want finish, and thousands of others waiting for reviews. I suggest you just look for more independent references with significant coverage to show they are notable. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review Request

Hi, I rewrote the article Draft:Marscoin with more reliable sources and references. You may have a look if it is ok now? (: Regards, Yearnst Yearnst (talk) 23:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 12:11:58, 27 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 2603:8000:D500:4FC2:7573:465C:D2AC:2BF


I don’t understand why this is not getting approved, he is really famous in Mexico. He has over 100,000 followers ln his social media. I saw him acting on a TV show that’s why I wanted to create a page for him.

I would really appreciate if you help me understand what I’m doing wrong. Thank you ! Adamlevypr (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Adamlevypr all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS) - in this case see Wikipedia:Notability (people). The Amazon profile is minimal and also from IMDB which as user created content is not a reliable source. The other source is ok, but as it's half interview/direct quotes it is not completely independent. Note that having "100,000 followers" on social media is not notable, nor is just appearing on a TV show. However if he is "really famous in Mexico" then some more in-depth independent sources should exist. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kothadi & Draft:Jalgaon housing scam

Hi friend , I recently created two articles Draft: Kothadi ,Draft : Jalgaon housing scam but I don't know how to submit them review. Will you help me with that ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.220.85.12 (talk) 11:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Afc Statistics

Hi, hope you are doing well - do we have somewhere AfC Statistics published (Backlog per Month - How many new AfC Submissions per Month? - How many active Editors at AfC? etc.) ? CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scatter Records creation

Hi there. I'm the user who tries to create this Wikipedia article. I do believe that it deserves to be on the encyclopedia because it's a notable subject. It's an argentine record label that manages many musical bands and has its own website. I didn't add any more info at first because I intended to add them afterwards. Greetings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.107.55 (talk) 22:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I still believe that Scatter Records as innocent as it might seem, is really notable for the encyclopedia. It has its own website which has all of the info about it. You should check it out and help me to create it here, please. This is the website: https://scatterrecords.bandcamp.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.107.55 (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter One: The Hellfire Club

Could you please "re-review" my draft: "Chapter One: The Hellfire Club"? You reviewed it in January but declined it. I have now got eighteen references, the Stranger Things template, a Contents box, ten sections and an information box. It is FAR better than the last time you checked it. Cheers. User: 150.143.172.2, March 3 2021, 12:21

If ANYONE would like to review my draft, here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chapter_One:_The_Hellfire_Club — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.189.161 (talk) 14:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi 146.199.189.161, yes much improved from the first unsourced version. However to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. So unless you can find a reviewer with particular interest in the topic you'll just have to wait for someone to get around to it. Unfortunately we have more submissions that reviewers at the moment, so the backlog it depressingly big. KylieTastic (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, thanks for replying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.189.161 (talk) 15:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

help

Hey please can you help me i can’t publish my article Stneduc (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Submission Declined 'Aadha_Love'

Hi, I am a regular user/reader of Wikipedia, and I want to start my contribution. To learn I submitted the following article as I just saw the movie and found out that there was no page of the aforesaid movie.

Draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aadha_Love

Please suggest what should I do change in the article so that it is approved. I have referenced a major newspaper in Nepal and other review websites. What should I do next. Please suggest as I am new to it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sujansiddhi (talk • contribs) 14:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:CreepyCoder/sandbox/Creepy Adventure Pack

Thanks ill find a place that's supports my project.

CreepyCoder (talk) 17:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

help

Pleaseeeee I’m new and it’s important to publish this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohamed_Setrala help please can you edit it or do something or publish it on your page please Stneduc (talk) 10:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You mean that i can’t publish the article ?? Stneduc (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what should i do for make it as an article by the way it’s not a fan page is an article for fashion model. Stneduc (talk) 13:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

final help

Hey again kylie I’ve made the necessary changes can you review now thank you ❤️

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohamed_Setrala Stneduc (talk) 13:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The information I'm missing for my draft

Hello there. What are the stuff I am missing or are incorrect in my draft? Reviews, improper grammar, low on citation, not enough links? I hope you have a great day! ^^

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&oldid=1010441201"