Jump to content

User talk:JPxG/Archive4: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:JPxG. (BOT)
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:JPxG. (BOT)
Line 173: Line 173:


Hello everyone. It's nice to see you all here. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjamin]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello everyone. It's nice to see you all here. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjamin]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
==DYK for GPT-2==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2021/February#27 February 2021|27 February 2021]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[GPT-2]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the '''[[GPT-2]]''' [[artificial intelligence]] can summarize, respond to, generate, and translate text, despite being trained to do nothing more than predict the next word in a sequence?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/GPT-2]]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2021-02-17&end=2021-03-09&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=GPT-2 GPT-2])</small>, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]]. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 00:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:55, 13 March 2021


DYK for 2021 Moroccan general election

On 29 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 Moroccan general election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in advance of the 2021 general election, Morocco outlawed the making of certain types of online posts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Moroccan general election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 Moroccan general election), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very sad. But very true. jp×g 03:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bralessness on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, JPxG. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Allochronic speciation.
Message added 01:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for the heads-up. Responding now. jp×g 03:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Race and intelligence on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Hi JPxG,

Sorry for the delay in responding to this -- I have been enjoying the discussion but life is hectic now that the semester is in full swing. Perhaps our substantive differences are not so large, and have more to do with emphasis. I agree with you that typing out what a map says is ok, but I think this category of information is extremely limited in almost all cases. Regarding WP:MAPCITE specifically (and thanks for finding it and pointing it out, it was an interesting read): the relevant section "Sources" has four subsections. The first, "Usage", seems mistitled and basically meaningless. Everything in the second section seems fine. I accept the suggestion in the section "Relevance" that it would be ok to use a map to source the altitude of a geographic feature. However, the proposal that a map be used as a source for the relative position of two locations makes me less comfortable, not because a map is unlikely to be correct but because if a map is the only source for such information then it seems to be introducing an issue of due weight, in practice probably to some end that would violate WP:SYNTH. I disagree with only one sentence in the section "Original research": It would be acceptable to say "The freeway first appeared on the department of transportation's map in 1951" or "The freeway was constructed by 1951" (assuming the source has a reputation for accuracy in its map updates) in the above case. The first proposed sentence strikes me as an unambiguous violation of WP:SYNTH; the second one is less bad, but again raises an issue of due weight.

What do you think?

All the best, JBL (talk) 23:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JayBeeEll: Thanks for replying. I think that, on this stuff, we mostly agree. My main contention on the noticeboard was that it ought to be permissible to do this within certain bounds; obviously, like the freeway example, it's possible to do SYNTH from map information, but this is the same as SYNTH applied to any other type of source and there doesn't seem to be any unique badness endemic to maps. jp×g 22:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeepFuckingValue

Good work on DeepFuckingValue. I was wondering, ever thought of nominating it at WP:DYK? It certainly would make for a good hook for the front page in my opinion. Clearly it looks like both discussions are going to be closed in favour of the article but it is OK to nominate whilst the discussion are ongoing. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I feel like the article's content is nowhere near stable enough to pass review right now; on the other hand, it wouldn't cost me anything to just nom it anyway. jp×g 22:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Crusading on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

January 2021 GOCE Drive bling

The Cleanup Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to JPxG for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 5th Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to JPxG for copyediting 15 articles during the GOCE January 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Keith Gill (investor)

On 19 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Keith Gill (investor), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Keith Gill's username, "DeepFuckingValue", was chosen to reflect his belief in value investing? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Keith Gill (investor)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you missed one.

Browns Island (San Joaquin County) still doesn't have a pic. - Sumanuil (talk) 04:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

riot

riot 2600:1700:EFA0:2980:298D:844C:C177:4E9C (talk) 07:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


hello hello hello hello hello hello hello hello hello hello 07:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)07:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Mattiematical (talk)

(talk page stalker) sup mattie Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
hello vat of cider Mattiematical (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone. It's nice to see you all here. Benjamin (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GPT-2

On 27 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article GPT-2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the GPT-2 artificial intelligence can summarize, respond to, generate, and translate text, despite being trained to do nothing more than predict the next word in a sequence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/GPT-2. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, GPT-2), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]