Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercenary Technology: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Rondolinda (talk | contribs) |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 13:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 13:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. [[User:Rondolinda|Rondolinda]] ([[User talk:Rondolinda|talk]]) 23:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. [[User:Rondolinda|Rondolinda]] ([[User talk:Rondolinda|talk]]) 23:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Don't delete'''. Though the company doesn't meet the notability guidelines the article is still able to remain as more people will be able to discover the developer. |
|||
Revision as of 14:30, 14 March 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mercenary Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A WP:BEFORE only showed passing mentions of the company in connection to games it worked on. Since the company does not produce original games, just provides support or port development, a navigation list on grounds of being a "creative force" makes little sense. IceWelder [✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Don't delete. Though the company doesn't meet the notability guidelines the article is still able to remain as more people will be able to discover the developer.