User talk:Olessi: Difference between revisions
rm comment already at Talk:Trentino-South Tyrol |
Withdraw the lies end pompous accussations |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
''Formatting may be adjusted for consistency.'' <br> |
''Formatting may be adjusted for consistency.'' <br> |
||
</small> |
</small> |
||
== Withdraw the lies end pompous accussations == |
|||
Also such disclaimers like “Though no international judicial body has considered the issue, the deportations could be considered a crime against humanity under international law as the International Criminal Court” are unnecessary for the article. Somebody put all his imaginative bad thing in to one sac multiplies numbers for “better” look and call for some justice thou have nothing to proof. Saying could be is just provocation. There is a proof in today editions the references had nothing to do with truth. So instead creating a smelly accusation the individual should withdraw the lies.--[[User:207.245.84.70|207.245.84.70]] 05:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:44, 17 January 2007
 | Olessi is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
 Archives |
|---|
| Archive 1 (12-6-2005 – 17-11-2005) |
| Archive 2 (17-11-2005 – 08-2-2006) |
| Archive 3 (08-02-2005 – 30-08-2006) |
| Archive 4 (30-08-2006 – 31-12-2006) |
Note: If a conversation is spread across the talk pages of multiple users, I take
the liberty to copy related snippets to this talk page. Some comments were not
directly written on this page, but are always shown in the correct context.
Formatting may be adjusted for consistency.
Withdraw the lies end pompous accussations
Also such disclaimers like “Though no international judicial body has considered the issue, the deportations could be considered a crime against humanity under international law as the International Criminal Court” are unnecessary for the article. Somebody put all his imaginative bad thing in to one sac multiplies numbers for “better” look and call for some justice thou have nothing to proof. Saying could be is just provocation. There is a proof in today editions the references had nothing to do with truth. So instead creating a smelly accusation the individual should withdraw the lies.--207.245.84.70 05:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)