Talk:Tactical Response Group: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Law enforcement}} |
|||
Surely this page should be more about what the West Aussie TRG ''is'', rather than what the NSW TRG ''was''? [[User:Battle Ape|Battle Ape]] 08:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
Surely this page should be more about what the West Aussie TRG ''is'', rather than what the NSW TRG ''was''? [[User:Battle Ape|Battle Ape]] 08:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 12:00, 17 January 2007
 | Law Enforcement Disambig‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Surely this page should be more about what the West Aussie TRG is, rather than what the NSW TRG was? Battle Ape 08:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Why not simply create a new page forWAPol TRG? ie: Western Australia Police Tactical Response Group. QldPol SERT has its own specific page on account of the SERT accronym being used by other agencies around the place as does VicPol SOG. As we see here with the TRG name more than one agency uses it.
I'd argue that a comparitive page about WAPol TRG couldn't be created with as much information as the NSWPol one to deserve having the 'rpimary' rights to the article title TRG as it's a current unit and by virtue a secretive one without an online history availible to reference.
With what little info is availible and not wanting to publish 'inside' non-public released information I've knocked up one very dodgy but passable Western Australia Police Tactical Response Group just for you.