User talk:Neutrality

Picture of the day

2023–2024 Sundhnúkur eruptions

Photograph credit: Icelandic Meteorological Office

• Archive
• More featured pictures

AAR Corp

Can you please explain why you took the actions you did for AAR Corp. I added some factual text and references on 2/25. A Snooganssnoogans(SN) took it down, I put it back up. SN complained that it was "just mundane marketing language." Who is SN to decide? By that measure, most business Wikipedia entries are full of such language. I even rewrote the text but it was taken down again. What is going on. Fgbwashdc (talk)Fgbwashdc — Preceding undated comment added 18:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Fgbwashdc: When your edits are challenged, you need to obtain a consensus from other editors in order to make them again. You do that by discussing on the article talk page. Neutrality^talk 18:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hi, you had enquired about alternate account use with this IP. Did you get a response? Because they edited again today. - wolf 18:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Thewolfchild: I never got a specific answer, but on Talk:Officer of the United States he/she wrote, "I generally work incognito and only log in if I'm doing anything significant or voting. Likewise, I learned they already know me by my IP so I'm not exactly hiding anything. If it's important I can log in more readly." I think this is plainly an attempt to avoid scrutiny (especially because user pages don't disclose the connection between the IP and account). If you opened an WP:SPI or WP:ANI on this, I would gladly support it. Neutrality^talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

It appears they have confirmed the connection between the accounts; the registered account posted an unsigned comment on an article talk page, and even though another editor added their signature with an 'unsigned' template the next day, the IP account then signed the post, as the IP, the day after that (oddly inserting the IP signature between the post and the registered account's signature).

Obviously, there's concerns such as using both accounts in the same talk page debate leading to a change in disputed content, (as they did here), but with this info, I don't think an SPI is needed. A few days ago, an ANI would've been in order, as they were being disruptive, but they were since been blocked. It has since come out that they have emailed multiple people, so I was just curious if that included you. Cheers - wolf 20:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feral cat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attrition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Mark F. Pomerantz

On 17 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark F. Pomerantz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that attorney Mark F. Pomerantz, who supervised the prosecution of mob boss John A. Gotti, is now assisting a criminal investigation into Donald Trump's finances? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark F. Pomerantz. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mark F. Pomerantz), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you because of your amazing work on the cat page!

CrayonArt45 (talk) 03:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)