Jump to content

Talk:Mia Farrow: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Mia Farrow/Archive 1) (bot
Line 39: Line 39:
==This edit==
==This edit==
[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Mia_Farrow&diff=1011730175&oldid=1011368525], with the extraordinarily [[WP:OWN]] order in the edit summary that we are not allowed to touch this edit, seems highly [[WP:UNDUE]] and pushing a [[WP:SYNTH]] argument. Mia Farrow's relationships, good and bad, with her children are of course pertinent, but this clearly one-sided soapbox of a section does not seem encyclopedic to me.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 22:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Mia_Farrow&diff=1011730175&oldid=1011368525], with the extraordinarily [[WP:OWN]] order in the edit summary that we are not allowed to touch this edit, seems highly [[WP:UNDUE]] and pushing a [[WP:SYNTH]] argument. Mia Farrow's relationships, good and bad, with her children are of course pertinent, but this clearly one-sided soapbox of a section does not seem encyclopedic to me.--[[User:Tenebrae|Tenebrae]] ([[User talk:Tenebrae|talk]]) 22:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

While I think it's necessary for the allegations to be at least mentioned, this is clearly editorialising. Soon-Yi's [https://www.newsweek.com/soon-yi-speaks-lets-not-get-hysterical-197958 ‘Let’s Not Get Hysterical’] and Moses' [http://mosesfarrow.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-son-speaks-out-by-moses-farrow.html ‘A Son Speaks Out’] should be added to References and the paragraphs need to be trimmed down, while quoting is allowed, I think this is in violation of [[WP:NPS]] [[User:Roan Asher|Roan Asher]] ([[User talk:Roan Asher|talk]]) 14:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:43, 22 March 2021

Template:Vital article

POV

'Farrow declined the sentimental offer'

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Farrow's religious beliefs

I don't think Mia Farrow considers herself Catholic any longer, she's studying to be a deacon in the Episcopal church. the source is archive.commercialappeal.com/entertainment/actress-mia-farrow-puts-beliefs-into-action-through-human-rights-advocacy-ep-363335733-324153181.html/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5B60:DF0:15BF:665C:1CB:B215 (talk) 22:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mia's brother John Villiers Farrow

In the past weeks, the reference to Mia's brother John has repeatedly been added and removed. I believe it should stay, as his being Mia's brother is a fact, and is not seriously challenged. However, the footnote about him now says "John Charles' homosexual tendencies surfaced in the press in 2012, when he was arrested for molesting two boys in Maryland." I believe that his arrest and subsequent conviction show a criminal and abusive side, not his (alleged) homosexuality. Had he abused two girls instead of boys, it would not show 'his heterosexual tendencies'. It reeks of bigotry to 'explain' cases of child sexual abuse by a sexual orientation of the perpetrator other than pedophilia, and to associate the abuse of boys with homosexuality. So I propose to change the wording here. Any objections? Mcouzijn (talk) 04:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse allegations against Mia

Many of her kids have accused her of abuse. I’m presuming this has been scrubbed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:18AE:4900:C9F9:77BC:2ECA:7C2A (talk) 23:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit

[1], with the extraordinarily WP:OWN order in the edit summary that we are not allowed to touch this edit, seems highly WP:UNDUE and pushing a WP:SYNTH argument. Mia Farrow's relationships, good and bad, with her children are of course pertinent, but this clearly one-sided soapbox of a section does not seem encyclopedic to me.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I think it's necessary for the allegations to be at least mentioned, this is clearly editorialising. Soon-Yi's ‘Let’s Not Get Hysterical’ and Moses' ‘A Son Speaks Out’ should be added to References and the paragraphs need to be trimmed down, while quoting is allowed, I think this is in violation of WP:NPS Roan Asher (talk) 14:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]